Editing Talk:Polterpiranha
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
::::::::::::::Regardless, i still feel that it should be moved to Polterpiranha. <small><small>Oh, that's the proposal i want to override in the sense of internal filenames having priority over guide names.</small></small> Also, @Doomhiker, there's a difference between speculation and intent. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 03:38, March 28, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::::::::::Regardless, i still feel that it should be moved to Polterpiranha. <small><small>Oh, that's the proposal i want to override in the sense of internal filenames having priority over guide names.</small></small> Also, @Doomhiker, there's a difference between speculation and intent. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 03:38, March 28, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::What i am trying to say above, is that there is a difference between speculation and what localizers intended. Regardless, it's pretty clear to me that "Ghost" is citogenesis, and just because of the Nipper Dandelion situation doesn't mean we shouldn't move this to Polterpiranha. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:14, April 13, 2019 (EDT) --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:14, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::What i am trying to say above, is that there is a difference between speculation and what localizers intended. Regardless, it's pretty clear to me that "Ghost" is citogenesis, and just because of the Nipper Dandelion situation doesn't mean we shouldn't move this to Polterpiranha. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:14, April 13, 2019 (EDT) --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:14, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::::::As I mentioned above, [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Make an exception to source priority for articles with identical names|this proposal]] supports an immediate move to Polterpiranha. | ::::::::::::::::As I mentioned above, [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Make an exception to source priority for articles with identical names|this proposal]] supports an immediate move to Polterpiranha. 09:16, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::::Despite it being in-game? --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:19, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::::Despite it being in-game? --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:19, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::::::::Arguably yes, and it helps that there doesn't really seem to be any opposition to the move. | ::::::::::::::::::Arguably yes, and it helps that there doesn't really seem to be any opposition to the move. 09:32, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::::::<!-- Should make another proposal about the source priority exception for a more case-by-case basis --> It would seem that there is one disagreement. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:26, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::::::<!-- Should make another proposal about the source priority exception for a more case-by-case basis --> It would seem that there is one disagreement. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:26, April 13, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::::::::::After the Nipper Dandelion proposal, I feel that renaming Ghost, as off as it sounds, would now be an inconsistency. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:51, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::::::::::::::::After the Nipper Dandelion proposal, I feel that renaming Ghost, as off as it sounds, would now be an inconsistency. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 10:51, April 22, 2019 (EDT) |