Editing Talk:Poltergust
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Merge Poltergust 3000, Poltergust 5000 and Poltergust G-00 == | == Merge Poltergust 3000, Poltergust 5000 and Poltergust G-00 == | ||
{{ | |||
{{TPP}} | |||
Following the discussion above, this proposal aims to merge [[Poltergust 3000]], [[Poltergust 5000]] and [[Poltergust G-00]] into a single {{Fake link|Poltergust}} page. | Following the discussion above, this proposal aims to merge [[Poltergust 3000]], [[Poltergust 5000]] and [[Poltergust G-00]] into a single {{Fake link|Poltergust}} page. | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Remembering all the names is annoying. Especially when you forget the first one is 3000 rather than 2000, so you end up at the kart trying to go to the ''Dark Moon'' one. | #{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Remembering all the names is annoying. Especially when you forget the first one is 3000 rather than 2000, so you end up at the kart trying to go to the ''Dark Moon'' one. | ||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Makes sense to us. Per proposal. | #{{User|Camwoodstock}} Makes sense to us. Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|EvieMaybe}} up until very recently i didn't know they shared a japanese name. even if they didn't, they're still closer to iterations on the same object, rather than completely separate items. per all! | #{{User|EvieMaybe}} up until very recently i didn't know they shared a japanese name. even if they didn't, they're still closer to iterations on the same object, rather than completely separate items. per all! | ||
===Support (separate articles alongside catch-all Poltergust article)=== | ===Support (separate articles alongside catch-all Poltergust article)=== | ||
Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
#{{User|Ray Trace}} This has been my choice since the start. | #{{User|Ray Trace}} This has been my choice since the start. | ||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Ray Trace. | #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Ray Trace. | ||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} I do not support completely merging the articles, but I think it would be | #{{User|TheFlameChomp}} I do not support completely merging the articles, but I think it would be find to have a catch-all article too. | ||
#{{User|Arend}} Per Ray Trace. | #{{User|Arend}} Per Ray Trace. | ||
#{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} Per all. | #{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} Per all. | ||
Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
#{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Per all | #{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Per all | ||
#{{User|Shadow2}} My opinion is still for "Oppose" but I'd rather move my vote here so that the vote isn't split enough to ruin the majority. | #{{User|Shadow2}} My opinion is still for "Oppose" but I'd rather move my vote here so that the vote isn't split enough to ruin the majority. | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
#{{User|PrincessPeachFan}} No. | #{{User|PrincessPeachFan}} No. | ||
#{{User|Technetium}} Per Ray Trace. | |||
#{{User|Mario}} I don't think the "their names are alike" is a valid reason to try to split. I view those numbers in the end like hardware iterations (with their own branches), similar to RTX series or iPhone series. It's why Poltergust 3000 in Luigi's Mansion 1 jumps to Poltergust 4000 in Mario Kart DS (I use 4 wheels = 4000 as a memory helping device) and then it jumps to Poltergust 5000 in Dark Moon. So things like RTX 30 series, RTX 40 series, RTX 50 series get their own pages. It makes sense if iterations of Poltergust get the similar treatment. Not to mention, these all look different from each other and have spinoffs iterate on the designs, which a merge is just gonna blur all together and create kind of a mess of a page that doesn't really have a clean continuity like the current setup. | |||
#{{User|PopitTart}} It seems silly to merge these explicitly distinguished devices which each have a different appearance, different capabilities, and different names. (Important to note: Luigi's Mansion 3 features the distinct version numbers in E-Gadd's schematics, regardless of language.) I agree with other opposers that creating a Poltergust umbrella article while keeping the individual articles would be favorable. | #{{User|PopitTart}} It seems silly to merge these explicitly distinguished devices which each have a different appearance, different capabilities, and different names. (Important to note: Luigi's Mansion 3 features the distinct version numbers in E-Gadd's schematics, regardless of language.) I agree with other opposers that creating a Poltergust umbrella article while keeping the individual articles would be favorable. | ||
#{{User|Wonder Time!}} Per all, especially Ray Trace. | #{{User|Wonder Time!}} Per all, especially Ray Trace. | ||
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. | |||
<s>#{{User|Ray Trace}} I still prefer letting each design have their own article while the general catch-all Poltergust article briefly summarizes their appearances ala [[Mario Circuit]]<br>#{{User|Arend}} Per Ray Trace and Shadow2.<br>#{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} Per all.<br>#{{User|Tails777}} I know I pretty much sounded like I'd support a merge and to a degree, I kinda still do. But I also kinda like Ray Trace's idea a bit more and Arend brings up a decent point too. | <s>#{{User|Ray Trace}} I still prefer letting each design have their own article while the general catch-all Poltergust article briefly summarizes their appearances ala [[Mario Circuit]]<br>#{{User|Arend}} Per Ray Trace and Shadow2.<br>#{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} Per all.<br>#{{User|Tails777}} I know I pretty much sounded like I'd support a merge and to a degree, I kinda still do. But I also kinda like Ray Trace's idea a bit more and Arend brings up a decent point too. | ||
<br>#{{User|Sparks}} Per all. | <br>#{{User|Sparks}} Per all. | ||
<br>#{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Per all | <br>#{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Per all | ||
<br>#{{User|Shadow2}} No, they each have different functions and are therefore different, unique devices | <br>#{{User|Shadow2}} No, they each have different functions and are therefore different, unique devices.</s> | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 113: | Line 110: | ||
::::Wouldn't such an article go against into "once and only once"? Every single appearance would be covered on two different pages, unlike [[Koopa Shell]], for example. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 06:34, January 9, 2025 (EST) | ::::Wouldn't such an article go against into "once and only once"? Every single appearance would be covered on two different pages, unlike [[Koopa Shell]], for example. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 06:34, January 9, 2025 (EST) | ||
:::::Not necessarily because the Poltergust article would just be a brief summary than an in-depth look at each iteration, similar to practically members of species or organizations such as [[Koopalings]] or [[Axem Rangers]]. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 12:59, January 9, 2025 (EST) | :::::Not necessarily because the Poltergust article would just be a brief summary than an in-depth look at each iteration, similar to practically members of species or organizations such as [[Koopalings]] or [[Axem Rangers]]. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 12:59, January 9, 2025 (EST) | ||