Editing Talk:Plurp
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:::I think that we shouldn't treat a source from over 5 years after release, let alone 30+, be used as the game enemy listing's lavel. Page name sure, but the "at the time" approach should be exactly that when applicable - '''at the time'''. (On another note, [[Sleepy Boo]] → Big Boo and [[Winged Strollin' Stu]] → [[Swipin' Stu]].) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:04, August 22, 2022 (EDT) | :::I think that we shouldn't treat a source from over 5 years after release, let alone 30+, be used as the game enemy listing's lavel. Page name sure, but the "at the time" approach should be exactly that when applicable - '''at the time'''. (On another note, [[Sleepy Boo]] → Big Boo and [[Winged Strollin' Stu]] → [[Swipin' Stu]].) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:04, August 22, 2022 (EDT) | ||
::::My attitude too. It'd be ridiculous if, for example, we suddenly replaced perfectly fine references with one that came into existence decades later just because of priority, and for one thing that would confuse readers for no good reason. What I mean is mainly the possibility of having policy rewritten to elevate Nintendo-centric web content above 4 or possibly 3 rather than keeping it in that nebulous miscellaneous area, but at least below 2 in an effort to mostly rectify this issue. (As for ''Super Mario Sunshine'', we already basically treat the Prima guide as the primary one over the Nintendo Power one anyway, as source exceptions have indicated in the past.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 00:50, August 22, 2022 (EDT) | ::::My attitude too. It'd be ridiculous if, for example, we suddenly replaced perfectly fine references with one that came into existence decades later just because of priority, and for one thing that would confuse readers for no good reason. What I mean is mainly the possibility of having policy rewritten to elevate Nintendo-centric web content above 4 or possibly 3 rather than keeping it in that nebulous miscellaneous area, but at least below 2 in an effort to mostly rectify this issue. (As for ''Super Mario Sunshine'', we already basically treat the Prima guide as the primary one over the Nintendo Power one anyway, as source exceptions have indicated in the past.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 00:50, August 22, 2022 (EDT) | ||