Editing Talk:Plurp

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 32: Line 32:
:::I think that we shouldn't treat a source from over 5 years after release, let alone 30+, be used as the game enemy listing's lavel. Page name sure, but the "at the time" approach should be exactly that when applicable - '''at the time'''. (On another note, [[Sleepy Boo]] → Big Boo and [[Winged Strollin' Stu]] → [[Swipin' Stu]].) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:04, August 22, 2022 (EDT)
:::I think that we shouldn't treat a source from over 5 years after release, let alone 30+, be used as the game enemy listing's lavel. Page name sure, but the "at the time" approach should be exactly that when applicable - '''at the time'''. (On another note, [[Sleepy Boo]] → Big Boo and [[Winged Strollin' Stu]] → [[Swipin' Stu]].) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:04, August 22, 2022 (EDT)
::::My attitude too. It'd be ridiculous if, for example, we suddenly replaced perfectly fine references with one that came into existence decades later just because of priority, and for one thing that would confuse readers for no good reason. What I mean is mainly the possibility of having policy rewritten to elevate Nintendo-centric web content above 4 or possibly 3 rather than keeping it in that nebulous miscellaneous area, but at least below 2 in an effort to mostly rectify this issue. (As for ''Super Mario Sunshine'', we already basically treat the Prima guide as the primary one over the Nintendo Power one anyway, as source exceptions have indicated in the past.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 00:50, August 22, 2022 (EDT)
::::My attitude too. It'd be ridiculous if, for example, we suddenly replaced perfectly fine references with one that came into existence decades later just because of priority, and for one thing that would confuse readers for no good reason. What I mean is mainly the possibility of having policy rewritten to elevate Nintendo-centric web content above 4 or possibly 3 rather than keeping it in that nebulous miscellaneous area, but at least below 2 in an effort to mostly rectify this issue. (As for ''Super Mario Sunshine'', we already basically treat the Prima guide as the primary one over the Nintendo Power one anyway, as source exceptions have indicated in the past.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 00:50, August 22, 2022 (EDT)
::::Basically, here's the question that needs to be addressed given historical presence of physical media: "If web content were moved higher as a source tier, will that necessarily result in more exceptions with regards to legacy names?" Unless a cut-off point or some other clear-cut rule were defined, I don't see how it can't. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 09:15, August 24, 2022 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)