| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Split Red Pepper, Green Pepper, and Blue Pepper == | | == Split Red Pepper, Green Pepper, and Blue Pepper == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | |
| {{Proposal outcome|passed|9-3|split}}
| | {{TPP}} |
| Unlike the case with the Beans, these are actual consumable items in-battle, thus splitting these would arguably be less contentious. | | Unlike the case with the Beans, these are actual consumable items in-battle, thus splitting these would arguably be less contentious. |
|
| |
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| ===Support=== | | ===Support=== |
| #{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per proposal. | | #{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per proposal. |
| #{{User|Niiue}} Separate items with unique names and effects, per proposal.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all. They are separate items, are distinguished, and it's not just an aethistic change.
| |
| #{{User|Obsessive Mario Fan}} The consumable items are clearly different from other appearances of peppers in the ''Mario'' series.
| |
| #{{User|Doomhiker}} Arguably the fact that they boost different stats makes them more distinct than other variants of items like [[Max Cheese]]. Putting them on the same page is like treating them as the same thing. I also support splitting the beans, but these have even more reason to be split given them being regular items.
| |
| #{{User|7feetunder}} The only thing distinguishing the different kinds of [[Nut]]s, [[Syrup Jar]]s, [[Hot Drumstick|Drumstick]]s, etc. is the amount of HP/BP they restore. They even have the same sprite. If those deserve separate articles, so do the peppers.
| |
| #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|bwburke94}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|TheFlameChomp}} I feel that splitting these would be consistent with other split variant items. Per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Oppose=== | | ===Oppose=== |
| Line 22: |
Line 14: |
| #{{User|Lord Grammaticus}} This would be a fine article for the colored peppers to redirect to, it's just that the article itself isn't too well put together. Organize it, flesh it out, and then have each named pepper redirect to the article's ''Mario & Luigi'' section, and that'll probably be the best solution. | | #{{User|Lord Grammaticus}} This would be a fine article for the colored peppers to redirect to, it's just that the article itself isn't too well put together. Organize it, flesh it out, and then have each named pepper redirect to the article's ''Mario & Luigi'' section, and that'll probably be the best solution. |
| #{{User|MikhailMCraft}} Per all. I feel this becomes the same situation with the bean splitting proposal. Instead of splitting, just improve the main article and expand the respective sections. | | #{{User|MikhailMCraft}} Per all. I feel this becomes the same situation with the bean splitting proposal. Instead of splitting, just improve the main article and expand the respective sections. |
| <s>#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per all. The only split I'd consider going with would be a general "Pepper (Mario & Luigi series)" article, but that's pretty iffy in my opinion.</s>
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Comments=== | | ===Comments=== |
| I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here. Splitting articles just creates more articles to maintain when it could be ''much'' easier to expand the main article itself. If you feel you ''truly'' cannot expand anymore, ''then'' make a proposal, else I feel this will lead nowhere. --[[User:MikhailMCraft|MikhailMCraft]] ([[User talk:MikhailMCraft|talk]]) 19:19, September 30, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| :But if they are different items, they should have separate articles. This isn't about maintaining less articles, it's about whether or not the peppers in the ''Mario & Luigi'' series are distinct from generic peppers. For example, [[Hook Guy]]s could easily be covered in the [[Shy Guy]] article, which would be less to maintain, but they get separate articles because they are distinct from each other. {{User:Obsessive Mario Fan/sig}} 15:05, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| ::It seems you completely ignored my first point. Why not just have it on one main article? It's all in one place, and it's easier to find info on it. --[[User:MikhailMCraft|Mikhail]]•[[Special:Contributions/MikhailMCraft|M]]•[[User talk:MikhailMCraft|Craft]] 15:22, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| :::See [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/44#Split the Mario & Luigi and Super Mario RPG consumables into separate articles|this proposal]] for clarity. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 15:27, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| ::::So then, to my understanding, this proposal shouldn't have to be held, because according to the proposal you linked, it should just be split automatically. --[[User:MikhailMCraft|Mikhail]]•[[Special:Contributions/MikhailMCraft|M]]•[[User talk:MikhailMCraft|Craft]] 15:36, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Even though that article dealt with more specific subjects, overall it fully supports the idea of splitting variants of items. I assume beans full under it too. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 15:44, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::Alright, then cancel this proposal and just create the separate pages. --[[User:MikhailMCraft|Mikhail]]•[[Special:Contributions/MikhailMCraft|M]]•[[User talk:MikhailMCraft|Craft]] 15:48, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::If this proposal passes, will we have to revisit the Bean thing? I hope so. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 12:20, October 13, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::Why would we re-visit the Bean proposal? This proposal is a completely separate from that one, and the Bean proposal was already cancelled. --[[User:MikhailMCraft|MikhailMCraft]] ([[User_talk:MikhailMCraft|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MikhailMCraft|contribs]]) 14:28, October 14, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::No, I think FoY actually has a point there - both the split-off Peppers ''and'' many of the beans listed on their article are items used in RPGs, so it would be more logical to treat those the same way. The Bean issue may be worth revisiting, though the discussion should be used to refine any future proposals on the matter prior to actually making them. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 07:45, October 22, 2019 (EDT)
| |
