Editing Talk:Paris Promenade
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
if i am being completely, brutally honest, I don't see a single benefit of making them all separate pages, because surely that would just be more inconvenient and confusing for people to browse, surely that would mean more loading time between pages, more pages with less info on and more repetitive articles? can someone fill me in on how splitting them would be better than combining them? [[User:RSM|RSM]], not who i used to be. 07:24, April 25, 2022 (EDT) | if i am being completely, brutally honest, I don't see a single benefit of making them all separate pages, because surely that would just be more inconvenient and confusing for people to browse, surely that would mean more loading time between pages, more pages with less info on and more repetitive articles? can someone fill me in on how splitting them would be better than combining them? [[User:RSM|RSM]], not who i used to be. 07:24, April 25, 2022 (EDT) | ||
:I think one of the main reasons they are separate is because they are technically different tracks, even if they all take place in the same area and use the same routes as other variants. And if I'm gonna be honest, if these tracks weren't returning in MK8D with the idea of using different routes on different laps, I'd probably support them being split. But with MK8D adding these tracks by their base name, but not racing by their base layouts, I do feel it might be easier to merge them together. Either giving the MK8D versions their own article or merging them all, I'm okay with either. I feel it would be better than having a section on Tokyo Blur 1's article listing a version that also races on Tokyo Blur 2 and Tokyo Blur 3 (and to a lesser degree, the naming becomes rather inconsistent, as all other tracks that have returned have their console abbreviations/prefixes before them, but Tour tracks don't because Tour is always updating, so an article for the MK8D versions could help with that.) {{User:Tails777/sig}} | :I think one of the main reasons they are separate is because they are technically different tracks, even if they all take place in the same area and use the same routes as other variants. And if I'm gonna be honest, if these tracks weren't returning in MK8D with the idea of using different routes on different laps, I'd probably support them being split. But with MK8D adding these tracks by their base name, but not racing by their base layouts, I do feel it might be easier to merge them together. Either giving the MK8D versions their own article or merging them all, I'm okay with either. I feel it would be better than having a section on Tokyo Blur 1's article listing a version that also races on Tokyo Blur 2 and Tokyo Blur 3 (and to a lesser degree, the naming becomes rather inconsistent, as all other tracks that have returned have their console abbreviations/prefixes before them, but Tour tracks don't because Tour is always updating, so an article for the MK8D versions could help with that.) {{User:Tails777/sig}} | ||
::I think the thing swaying me most toward a full merge is that... I think that whole "new route through same 3D space" and "new track with same tileset" distinction is the actual philosophy Nintendo themselves are using. I mean, I didn't understand why Kalimari Desert 2 wasn't an RMX course until having this conversation. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 13:44, April 25, 2022 (EDT) | ::I think the thing swaying me most toward a full merge is that... I think that whole "new route through same 3D space" and "new track with same tileset" distinction is the actual philosophy Nintendo themselves are using. I mean, I didn't understand why Kalimari Desert 2 wasn't an RMX course until having this conversation. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 13:44, April 25, 2022 (EDT) | ||
:::Not gonna lie, when Kalimari Desert 2 was first shown off, I thought it was a RMX track. But there is a clear difference between the city tracks and the SNES/RMX tracks. Those are entirely new layouts in general and, obviously speaking, should remain split from each other. They're not re-routes, they only share the same backgrounds and same tileset, not the same layouts. The city tracks do share layouts (such as Paris Promenade 1 and 3 both going around the Arc de Triomphe or all three going under the Eiffel Tower). They all use the same track, just different routes. I'd support merging the city tracks into one and even merging Kalimari Desert 2 (though maybe best to make that a separate option too, like merging just the city tracks and merging the city tracks and KD2), but the SNES/RMX tracks I'd vote to remaining split. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | :::Not gonna lie, when Kalimari Desert 2 was first shown off, I thought it was a RMX track. But there is a clear difference between the city tracks and the SNES/RMX tracks. Those are entirely new layouts in general and, obviously speaking, should remain split from each other. They're not re-routes, they only share the same backgrounds and same tileset, not the same layouts. The city tracks do share layouts (such as Paris Promenade 1 and 3 both going around the Arc de Triomphe or all three going under the Eiffel Tower). They all use the same track, just different routes. I'd support merging the city tracks into one and even merging Kalimari Desert 2 (though maybe best to make that a separate option too, like merging just the city tracks and merging the city tracks and KD2), but the SNES/RMX tracks I'd vote to remaining split. {{User:Tails777/sig}} |