Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 30: |
Line 30: |
| :::::::::::::I don't see how this policy is relevant to your point. If anything, it supports my argument more. [[User:Axis|Axis]] ([[User talk:Axis|talk]]) 14:26, May 24, 2024 (EDT) | | :::::::::::::I don't see how this policy is relevant to your point. If anything, it supports my argument more. [[User:Axis|Axis]] ([[User talk:Axis|talk]]) 14:26, May 24, 2024 (EDT) |
| ::::::::::::::Well, it's "package deals", and it doesn't say anything about guest appearences,just between unrelated stuff, which is relevant to my point. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 14:44, May 24, 2024 (EDT) | | ::::::::::::::Well, it's "package deals", and it doesn't say anything about guest appearences,just between unrelated stuff, which is relevant to my point. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 14:44, May 24, 2024 (EDT) |
| :::::::::::::::I'd argue guest appearance titles are unrelated, because the game itself isn't a ''Mario'' game. If a game called ''Nintendo Land + Nintendo Badge Arcade'' existed, it wouldn't have been covered here, because the games are guest appearance titles. [[User:Axis|Axis]] ([[User talk:Axis|talk]]) 14:53, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::But if guest appearances are "unrelated", then why cover them at all? [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 14:58, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::I don't think you understand my point. Guest appearance titles are covered from the perspective of the ''Mario'' series, and not much else. They are "unrelated" in a sense that package deals of them shouldn't be worthy of coverage on this wiki, because the games themselves aren't ''Mario'' games. I wouldn't have an issue with it if this was either ''NES Remix'' series wiki, or if the series had full coverage on this wiki (I don't think it should have full coverage btw) [[User:Axis|Axis]] ([[User talk:Axis|talk]]) 15:07, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::We only cover the Mario aspects of NES Remix, but seriously, why do you keep bringing up the "package deal of guest appearances" argument SO MANY DARN TIMES even though Ultimate NES Remix is TECHNICALLY like NES Remix Pack, and I could go on, but I don't want to because I don't want to bore you. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 15:14, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::::::::::As I've said above, I do not believe that guest appearance package deals should be covered on this wiki. This is why I keep bringing it up. [[User:Axis|Axis]] ([[User talk:Axis|talk]]) 07:02, May 25, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::::::But so is Ultimate NES Remix, even if it does a "pick and choose". [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)|talk]]) 14:51, May 27, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Given the pack itself still qualifies as a guest appearance, I don't see the need to get rid of this page. Also, what do we think of [[Game & Watch Collection]]? Not an identical situation, but it is also a bundle that is not 100% Mario. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 19:00, July 6, 2024 (EDT)
| |