Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 204: |
Line 204: |
| Why aren't there locations in Mario RPGs listed. I believe that those places count as places in the Mushroom World. | | Why aren't there locations in Mario RPGs listed. I believe that those places count as places in the Mushroom World. |
|
| |
|
| [[File:DaisyMP8Official.png|50px]][[File:YoshiMP8art.png|50px]]The Awesome Yoshi Fan [[User:Tails777|Tails777]][[File:Tails Sticker.png|50px]][[File:Toad Artwork - Mario Party 6.png|50px]] | | [[File:DaisyMP8Official.png|50px]][[File:YoshiMP8art.png|50px]]The Awesome Yoshi Fan [[User:Tails777|Tails777]][[File:Tails Sticker.png|50px]][[File:Toadsmall.jpg|50px]] |
| :Laziness. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 15:45, 23 May 2011 (EDT) | | :Laziness. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 15:45, 23 May 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| ::Then would it be O.K. if I added some of them? | | ::Then would it be O.K. if I added some of them? |
|
| |
|
| [[File:DaisyMP8Official.png|50px]][[File:YoshiMP8art.png|50px]]The Awesome Yoshi Fan [[User:Tails777|Tails777]][[File:Tails Sticker.png|50px]][[File:Toad Artwork - Mario Party 6.png|50px]] | | [[File:DaisyMP8Official.png|50px]][[File:YoshiMP8art.png|50px]]The Awesome Yoshi Fan [[User:Tails777|Tails777]][[File:Tails Sticker.png|50px]][[File:Toadsmall.jpg|50px]] |
|
| |
|
| :::Yeah {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | | :::Yeah {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} |
Line 242: |
Line 242: |
| :::It's just strange that they refuse to put Conker's homeland in it, I mean they accepted Isle O'Hags ([[Banjo]]'s homeland) on the page but not Conker's homeland. In [[Diddy Kong Racing]], it says that [[Diddy]] calls [[Squawks]] to deliver a message to Banjo and Conker for help, so it means that Banjo and Conker lives on the Mushroom World along with [[Mario]], [[DK]] and everyone else. --[[User:Metalex123|Metalex123]] ([[User talk:Metalex123|talk]]) 00:25, 5 March 2014 (EST) | | :::It's just strange that they refuse to put Conker's homeland in it, I mean they accepted Isle O'Hags ([[Banjo]]'s homeland) on the page but not Conker's homeland. In [[Diddy Kong Racing]], it says that [[Diddy]] calls [[Squawks]] to deliver a message to Banjo and Conker for help, so it means that Banjo and Conker lives on the Mushroom World along with [[Mario]], [[DK]] and everyone else. --[[User:Metalex123|Metalex123]] ([[User talk:Metalex123|talk]]) 00:25, 5 March 2014 (EST) |
| ::::This page kinda sucks anyway. I'll support its deletion. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 00:27, 5 March 2014 (EST) | | ::::This page kinda sucks anyway. I'll support its deletion. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 00:27, 5 March 2014 (EST) |
| :::::Sucked? I liked that page before they changed it into a SMB3 and Super Mario cartoon related page only... Why did they removed it??? --[[User:Metalex123|Metalex123]] ([[User talk:Metalex123|talk]]) 00:02, 7 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::Because the bulk of this article, when it was written as if Mushroom World was an actual planet, was fan speculation. See discussions around, including the talk page proposal. Mushroom World has always been referred as the collective kingdoms in ''Super Mario Bros. 3'' or just another euphemism for Mushroom Kingdom. Other referrals, frankly, are just pulled out of a collection of asses. The rest is just a poor attempt to make it up, to make it Mario's home planet, which contains Isle O'Hags for some silly reason. Saying that Panther Kingdom or Isle O'Hags is part of the Mushroom World is on the verge of fanfiction. We need to document facts, not write insane things or link insane things together to the point where it's largely based on speculation, misleading our readers and even having some people cite our wiki for this subpar job. {{User:Mario/sig}} 00:13, 7 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Skeptical == | | == Skeptical == |
| | |
| | {{talk}} |
| "''Mushroom World (Japanese: きのこのせかい), also known as Mario World (Japanese: マリオワールド) is the name of the planet Mario and his friends reside on.''" | | "''Mushroom World (Japanese: きのこのせかい), also known as Mario World (Japanese: マリオワールド) is the name of the planet Mario and his friends reside on.''" |
|
| |
|
Line 255: |
Line 255: |
|
| |
|
| ==Overhaul page== | | ==Overhaul page== |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | |
| {{Proposal outcome|passed|9-0}}
| | {{TPP}} |
| | |
| This page is a classic case of some users pushing their fanon vision of what the Mario universe is over quality and accurate content- and making the wiki a deserved laughingstock as a result. Common symptons of 2007-itis include: | | This page is a classic case of some users pushing their fanon vision of what the Mario universe is over quality and accurate content- and making the wiki a deserved laughingstock as a result. Common symptons of 2007-itis include: |
|
| |
|
Line 282: |
Line 283: |
| #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per all. | | #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per all. |
| #{{User|Bluetoad63}} Per the last line of the proposal. | | #{{User|Bluetoad63}} Per the last line of the proposal. |
| #{{User|Jazama}} Per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Keep as is=== | | ===Keep as is=== |
Line 289: |
Line 289: |
| What would actually be done to overhaul the article? I can assume that the nonsense will be removed, but what else will be done? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | | What would actually be done to overhaul the article? I can assume that the nonsense will be removed, but what else will be done? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} |
| :Well it refers to Mushroom Kingdom and Super Mario Bros. 3 places, plus the location in Paper Mario. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 12:14, 5 March 2014 (EST) | | :Well it refers to Mushroom Kingdom and Super Mario Bros. 3 places, plus the location in Paper Mario. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 12:14, 5 March 2014 (EST) |
|
| |
| Why would this need a proposal to rewrite it? {{User:Epic Rosalina/sig}} 13:05, 19 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :A good question, even if posed a bit late. Proposal or not, if it needs a rewrite, then a rewrite it shall get. {{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 21:30, 19 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Paper Mario references. ==
| |
|
| |
| Fizzle, here are some proof that Mushroom World is referred in Paper Mario.
| |
|
| |
| *"''Mushroom World is sometimes used in Paper Mario to refer to the game world. However, booting up the Japanese version, I can see that キノコワールド (Kinokowārudo) is not only indeed in the original script, but from what I can tell it actually replaces every instance of "Mushroom Kingdom"(!).''"
| |
| *"''Mushroom World is actually interchangeable with Mushroom Kingdom here - basically meaning that the translators tried to localize it to the more-familiar Mushroom Kingdom, but missed a few spots (the timer on the pause menu and that one Boo NPC).''"
| |
|
| |
| So, "Mushroom World" in ''Paper Mario'' is mentioned in the Japanese script, and it's synonymous with Mushroom Kingdom. {{User:Mario/sig}} 16:23, 23 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :Fair enough! I think there needs to be a distinction between the two locations because SMB3 seems to imply that the Mushroom Kingdom is separate. Is the Mushroom Kingdom referenced in name in the Japanese game, and if so is it simply Toad Town? Is the US game simply too loose with the term?
| |
| :I also saw the term "Kinoko no Sekai", but I wasn't sure where this name is from, because SMB3 uses Kinoko World and apparently so does Paper Mario. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 20:33, 23 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::I'd like say that since Mushroom Kingdom is a gateway to those lands, it's technically part of the Mushroom World. Plus, the names are quite related, which backs up my point, but I could always be wrong.
| |
|
| |
| ::In the Japanese version, ''Paper Mario'' substitutes "Mushroom World" over "Mushroom Kingdom", which means the two are interchangeable, hence "synonymous". I don't know what "Kinoko no Sekai" is derived from, but maybe it's a leftover from the old page, when the page used to be "This is Mario's home planet". {{User:Mario/sig}} 20:42, 23 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :::At the moment the page lists that name as coming from SMB3, but it's actually Kinoko World in that game, at least according to what I've seen. Perhaps it is named as the other name in the Advance version. I will double check this later. If anyone knows, that would be helpful.
| |
| :::As for Paper Mario, I feel like I need to check this out myself sometime too, I'm sure you're right, I just want to double check whether it is referring to the kingdom or not. It still might mean that the kingdom is just the castle and Toad Town and everything else is the Mushroom World (ala SMB3). But it might be just as you say, I'd have to see exact quotes. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 21:59, 23 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::"Kinoko" translates directly to "Mushroom", so as a conclusion, it's "Mushroom World", I'm assuming. Also, my view is that Mushroom World is collectively Mushroom Kingdom and the lands of ''Super Mario Bros. 3'' around it. I mean, I don't see any "Mario and Luigi leave the Mushroom World and return to Mushroom Kingdom". The line from Yoshi's Safari is also further evidence. {{User:Mario/sig}} 22:07, 23 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::"Sekai" is world, so yeah, "Kinoko no sekai" = "Mushroom World" (or "World of Mushrooms"), and Link the Lefty said in an earlier section that it's from SMB3; "Kinoko World" could be a partial translation. But to me, the most interesting non-English name is the NA Spanish name: "Planeta de los Hongos" - "''Planet'' of the Mushrooms", [http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planeta as far as I can tell]. Really, this is a wonderful example of how Nintendo does not give a flying leap about keeping its terminology straight. Sometimes it's one Japanese name, sometimes it's another, and sometimes it's "Mario('s) World" instead. Sometimes it's synonymous with the Mushroom Kingdom, but sometimes it means the kingdom ''and'' the vicinity. In other languages, sometimes it's "World", sometimes it's "Planet"; sometimes spinoffs imply that the "Mushroom World" ''is'' the planet. So what is it? It's all of the above. The kingdom, the vicinity, and I'd argue for the planet too. The old article was a mess, but the new one could still do to lose the superfluous gallery of SMB3 lands and the plot summaries and stick to the basic "what does it mean" stuff - which should include at least ''something'' about the entire planet being one of the many meanings. At least, that's what I think. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 00:04, 24 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::I suspect that name came from the cartoons and has just been left there. I'll do some research if I can find anything. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 23:05, 29 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::My main query was which game or source uses the name "Kinoko no Sekai"? Because I'm pretty sure SMB3 simply uses Kinoko World in katakana in the manual. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 23:05, 29 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::Which game uses "Planeta de los Hongos"? It could be a direct translation of the the article's old state. I put the gallery there to show the lands within the Mushroom World, so it's a visual help. There's not much to say other than "The Mushroom World is a collection of lands from ''Super Mario Bros. 3'', and stopping there would sound a bit abrupt, so I added what purpose it serves: being the setting for Super Mario Bros. 3. I probably wouldn't argue for the planet simply because there is no further evidence other than the Spanish name, and the planet thing hasn't been explored in dialogues nor in later games such as Super Mario Galaxy. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:17, 30 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::I did some research and corrected a number of names, and it made me think most of them had just been backwards translated, probably including that Planeta one too. I can't find any source that uses "Kinoko no Sekai" either, even SMB3 uses the same name that Yoshi's Safari and Paper Mario use. Unless someone can source them, I'll just remove the other ones soon. Interestingly, the French and Russian names actually appear to be "Mushroom Kingdom", and I can't find the names listed here for those languages. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 18:52, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Mario's Planet==
| |
| Since Mushroom World is considered as just a term for a collection of many kingdoms associated with the Mushroom Kingdom, should there ever be an article of Mario's actual planet? Like "Mario's Planet" or "Mushroom Planet", since we don't know the name of the planet. Especially since the world of ''Mario'' was shown to be a separate planet from Earth in ''Super Mario Galaxy'' and other games. It looked more like a blue planet. And the Planet of Mario shares the same locations of the spin-off series, ''Yoshi'', ''Donkey Kong'' and sometimes ''Wario''.
| |
|
| |
| So, how about an article of Mario's Planet, despite not having an actual name for it? Let's use a conjectural name for it... The '''Mushroom Planet''', '''Mario's Planet''', '''Planet of Mario''' or '''Mario World''' as the greater location of the whole ''Mario'' series and its spin-off series.--[[User:Prince Ludwig|Prince Ludwig]] ([[User talk:Prince Ludwig|talk]]) 14:03, 30 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :There isn't much to say about it, though, much as [[Sun]] got [[Talk:Sun|deleted]] because without sufficient padding, it's a self-explanatory object. The bottom-line, there isn't much incentive to create an article entitled "Mario's Planet". {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:20, 30 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :There is actually some indication that the world that Mario and everyone exist in really is just... Earth. Or a cartoony facsimile of it, anyway. Earth IS a mostly blue planet, after all. Recently, the Bermuda Triangle was referenced in Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze. Not a mainline Mario game, but interesting nonetheless. The whole idea of it being another dimension or planet really only comes from the cartoons and nowhere else as far as I am aware. The "Real World" thing is not part of main Mario canon and only exists in early American spinoff material (uh, and possibly the edutainment titles). Reminds me of how Sonic lived on "Mobius" in America and on Earth in Japan until later games applied the Japanese canon. Not saying it's EARTH as we know it, but I'm not sure it's particularly distinct from it either. Frankly though, there's so little information to go on, there's not much to say. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 21:19, 31 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::The Bermuda Triangle (which is just one ordinary, yet highly-publicized location) could be just spoofed. Again, there isn't much to say about Mario's home world and there really nothing compelling enough to write an article about it in Mario Wiki. Nobody really writes articles about Link's planet, Pokemon Trainer lady's planet, or Kirby's planet, so Mario should be the same. {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:00, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::I definitely agree, as an editor on the Zelda Wiki, the planet itself is not important. My only point is that in both instances they're just a "version" of Earth (note that the term "earth" is used in both games, though to refer to the ground) and in that respect there really isn't anything else to say, so I'm agreeing with you. In both series it has a sun, a moon, blue skies and oceans, and is otherwise much like Earth, except for all the video game stuff going on. Mario is effectively modern and Zelda is medieval(ish). Unless it receives a name, it's not important. [[User:Fizzle|Fizzle]] ([[User talk:Fizzle|talk]]) 20:48, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::"Nobody writes about Kirby's planet." Actually [[wikirby:Planet Popstar|Planet Popstar]] they do.{{unsigned|YoshiCookie}}
| |
| :::::Okay, you got me there, but it's still a stand-by level, just as Fox's planet gets its own page. Mario's planet is barely referred to anything, so I think it's pointless to have its own article. {{User:Mario/sig}} 23:04, 15 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::: Sure, because Earth has giant turtles that breath fire, dinosaurs with long tongues that turn everything they eat into eggs, and entire ''mountains'' floating around for no reason...I think not. Seriously, why is giving an article to a planet as complex as the Mushroom World/Planet/Whatever-Word-Nintendo-Decides-To-Use-Next a pointless idea? it's like if the LOTR Wiki didn't bother to make an article for all of Arda just because only two or three continents are relevant to the overall legendarium? It's still the most recurring setting, and it's a way to show that all these games share the same universe, instead of treating them all like a bunch of "Schrodinger's Towns" or whatever. I agree that it may not be relevant to include Hyrule or any of the other Zelda-related locations just because Link made some cameos here and there, but the Mario, Donkey Kong, Yoshi, etc. games ''are'' canon with one another, or Nintendo would've said so otherwise, and
| |
| ::::::: Anyone remember when Shigeru Miyamoto once said ''A Link to the Past'' was set ''after'' the original two ''Zelda'' games on NES, or when Nintendo claimed the Donkey Kong from the arcade game was still the current Donkey Kong instead of being a younger Cranky Kong before they changed their mind? Nintendo seems to change their story on a dime, so it's almost pointless to bring up information only relevant to an older game like ''Yoshi's Safari''. The reference to "Mushroom World" might have easily been a typo/mistranslation and it was actually meant to be "Mushroom Land" or "Mushroom Kingdom". Or, at least, it might as well have been one or the other. Not to mention, I don't see the point in calling the planet "Mario World" even though there's far more to the overall world than just Mario. It's like if Tatooine was called "Planet Skywalker", or if the Shire was called "Bilboland". Plus, people might confuse it with "Mario Land" or ''Super Mario World''.
| |
| ::::::: Alternatively, if I'm free to speculate, perhaps the "Mushroom World" seen on the SMB3 world map ''is'' the entire world, and the places we've seen in other games (Dinosaur Land, DK Isles, etc.) and/or even in the cartoons/comics are simply regions/provinces of the eight (nine, if you count Warp Zone) continents featured in SMB 3. (i.e. Mushroom Kingdom is a part of Grass Land, Aqua Land and Lava Land from the ''Super Mario Bros. Super Show!'' are in Water Land, etc.). It's just that the continents you play through in SMB 3 are greatly compressed for gameplay's sake, like what was done in the ''Elder Scrolls'' games, where the game worlds are usually ''much'' smaller than how they're described in-universe, and settlements described in-universe as thriving cityscapes are depicted as being little bigger than a small village. [[Special:Contributions/65.29.237.60|65.29.237.60]] 15:55, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| "Sure, because Earth has giant turtles that breath fire, dinosaurs with long tongues that turn everything they eat into eggs, and entire ''mountains'' floating around for no reason"
| |
|
| |
| Yes, and Earth doesn't have sentient trickster rabbits running around, American isn't populated by yellow-skined people with bulging eyes, Russia isn't invading the U.S as we discuss the deep Mario lores... etc. That doesn't mean Bugs Bunny, The Simpsons, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare or any number of work of fictions featuring clearly fictional creatures and events don't happen on a (fictional) Earth.
| |
|
| |
| "''it's like if the LOTR Wiki didn't bother to make an article for all of Arda just because only two or three continents are relevant to the overall legendarium?''"
| |
|
| |
| Arda is a named setting with (some vague pretense of) consistency. It's a specific concept that can be described. The "mario planet" isn't. Well yeah, the Mario games happen on an astral object. Just as we can infer the Mario characters use bipedal locomotion, breathe oxygen, or have a digestive system. What is there to write about? You could create a simple page that would be among the lines of "The Mario games happen on a planet. It has had various names. Here is a list of All The Places" (which would be pointless and is already done with categories), or we ''could'' attempt to speculate how it all ties together...
| |
|
| |
| except no, that would be bad. The wiki used to fanwank everything in the One True Timeline, it was awful, it's still getting mocked into some corner of the internet because of it, and it's something it has been wisely distanced itself from.
| |
|
| |
| "''It's still the most recurring setting, and it's a way to show that all these games share the same universe, instead of treating them all like a bunch of "Schrodinger's Towns" or whatever. I agree that it may not be relevant to include Hyrule or any of the other Zelda-related locations just because Link made some cameos here and there, but the Mario, Donkey Kong, Yoshi, etc. games ''are'' canon with one another, ''"
| |
|
| |
| Fact is, the Mario/Wario/DK games are developed by completely different people who have different ideas about what they want to do, and are quite happy to ignore each other. You can say that they're all totally related, or you can ask [http://www.dkvine.com/ this] ''donkey kong lores'' fansite that's agressivelly against the notion. It isn't some Marvel-type shared universe that's Totally Internaly Consistent and Nintendo just hasn't revealed the keys to understanding it yet, and presenting it as such would not be accurate. The wiki can describe the games from the out-of-universe perspective of how the IPs branched off from each other, and the in-universe nods that do exist, but making definitive statements about how it all ties together is not what it should do. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 18:37, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :"Yes, and Earth doesn't have sentient trickster rabbits running around, American isn't populated by yellow-skined people with bulging eyes, Russia isn't invading the U.S as we discuss the deep Mario lores... etc. That doesn't mean Bugs Bunny, The Simpsons, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare or any number of work of fictions featuring clearly fictional creatures and events don't happen on a (fictional) Earth."
| |
|
| |
| : Are you seriously comparing Call of Duty to the Mario series? Yes, fictional and even weird stuff has happened in the cartoons/games you mentioned, but CoD and SMB are in two entirely different levels of fiction. Yes, I can accept Mushroom World/Mario World being an alternate version of Earth, but saying that all this crazy, cartoon-like, physics-defying stuff happening on our Earth would be no different than a fictional Russian-American war, portrayed in a semi-realistic game like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare? Sorry, I just don't see the relevance in such a comparison. It's like comparing ''Crash Bandicoot'' to ''Grand Theft Auto IV''.[[Special:Contributions/65.29.237.60|65.29.237.60]] 21:15, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::[[Talk:Earth#The Mushroom Planet|This]] is probably the closest confirmation of the series' planet in almost any official media, which honestly isn't too hard to gather from how they travel there in the anime, ''Super Show'' and ''Comics System''/''Adventure Books'', and we've seen a few instances where the term "Earth" and related locations is brought up casually in later games. If you ask me, the Earth article should be split between the overall planet and what the cartoons call "the real world" (as for the counterpart of that, the ''Mario is Missing!'' manual considers it "[[Mario World#Trivia|Mario World]]"). It would be a better solution than a conjectural, hypothetical, unconfirmed second planet. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:49, 7 April 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::: How's that any less complicated? [[Special:Contributions/70.92.179.85|70.92.179.85]] 12:41, 27 January 2017 (EST)
| |
| ::::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9wWsEPdDbA&t=9m How indeed.] [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 09:45, 10 July 2017 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Why Banjo-Kazooie and Conker are a part of Mario's World ==
| |
|
| |
| There is a lot of misinformation and bias of opinion with regards to the canon-status of RareWare characters like Banjo and Conker, however I strongly believe that both properties are canon to the Mario universe. "Mushroom World" may refer to the worlds seen in Super Mario Bros 3, but the idea of a wiki page documenting the Mario 'universe' should not be tossed aside. The fact that Banjo and Conker are linked heavily with Donkey Kong, and originated from Diddy Kong Racing, is already enough to deem it canon to Mario's world. In other words, if the Red Hood is seen in a Batman comic, and Batman also interacts with Superman, that means the Red Hood is canon to the DC Universe and exists in Superman's world. There is a very clear link that even the developers of these games acknowledge.
| |
|
| |
| Mario's world doesn't really have any set rules in regards to visual design either, even with regards to it's own mainline games. Compare Isle Delfino to locations seen in other games; wildly different fauna, wildly different landscapes, wildly different characters and culture, etc. It's not far-fetched to conclude that Banjo and Conker also reside in the same world, it's not "fan fiction" to acknowledge this.
| |
|
| |
| I firmly request that a new page be created and approved that is reminiscent of the former "Mushroom World" page prior to it's overhaul.
| |
| {{unsigned|172.98.67.26}}
| |
| :We cover [[Banjo]], [[Kazooie]], and [[Conker the Squirrel]] themselves, but their worlds have nothing to do with Mario outside of subtle references. They may be connected, but so is Hyrule and the Kanto Region, and we don't cover those. They fall outside of our coverage. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 19:45, July 30, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| It goes beyond subtle reference and cameos, thus it can not be compared to any previous Zelda or Pokemon easter egg or confirmed non-canon crossovers like Super Smash Bros. These are actual, playable characters found in a mainline Donkey Kong title, including references found in both external material and in the games themselves. At one point there were going to be photos of Donkey Kong in Banjo-Kazooie, and a Banjo shower stall in Donkey Kong's treehouse in DK64. These references were removed, but the intention behind them still remains. I just find it puzzling why this connection is not mentioned more in this wiki when it's rather explicit. It's not just fan fiction or conjecture, not at all. Under the same conditions, there is no reason for the WarioWare or Wario Land games to be covered on this wiki, since they are very far removed from traditional Mario fare.
| |
| {{unsigned|172.98.67.26}}
| |
| :Well, we have [[List_of_Mario_references_in_Nintendo_video_games#Banjo-Kazooie_series]] and [[List_of_Mario_references_in_third-party_video_games#Banjo-Kazooie_series]] that can be expanded to include any missing information. The two series are certainly connected, but the characters being ''Mario'' franchise characters is not really established.
| |
| :Wario is an establish ''Mario'' character.
| |
| :Also, check out [[jiggywikki:|Jiggywikki]]. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:38, July 30, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| ::Remember to sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.{{User:DarkNight/sig}} 21:42, July 30, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :I realized that in one point of time you used to cover Banjo and Conker. [https://www.mariowiki.com/images/archive/2/29/20110427232410%21Importancetree.png] {{User:Wynn Liaw/sig}} 08:48, July 31, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| But you can also make the case that Wario shouldn't be covered outside of the Mario spin-off titles, since his games are about as connected to Mario as Banjo and Conker are. You can even include the Donkey Kong Country games if I'm frank, those have little relation to Mario aside from Donkey Kong himself. It can go either way, right?. I just find it strange to eschew Rare's characters when many pages of this wiki are just as "out there". If a place like the Metro Kingdom exists within Mario's world, I don't think Spiral Mountain is a stretch. [[Special:Contributions/172.98.67.27|172.98.67.27]] 09:46, July 31, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| So some backstory on this stuff: Back in the days (as in, literally a decade ago), there was split opinions over wheter the wiki should give full coverage to the Banjo and Conker video games. Eventually the compromise was to create two "Banjo series" and "Conker series" page that were literally just a big list of all the games/characters/items and those games, and basically they were huge piles of shit and there was a sentiment that either we should do it properly, or not at all. The later side won out.
| |
|
| |
| The main argument for it (and the one cited on [[Mariowiki:Coverage]]), and one I think is very valid, is that doing this is treating the two franchises as "Donkey Kong spinoffs" which is not really what happened: both Banjo and Conker were games that were in development for the Nintendo 64, they were intended to be released sometimes in 97 but were delayed, and because of that, Diddy Kong Racing took their intended spot as Rare's big holidays game and they decided to include the two characters to promote their upcoming games, although after DKR was released, Rare would decide to delay Conker and retool it in a very different form. They're more like guest stars It would be like calling Fire Emblem the Binding Blade as a "Super Smash Bros spinoff" because Roy showed up in there before his debut title (and yeah I realize the comparison is not 1:1, both because Fire Emblem is an established franchise and Smash Bros. is explictely billed as a crossover - but I think it's close enough).
| |
|
| |
| The Wario comparison is not a good one at all: Wario was created as a character whose everything is explicitely derivative of Mario, he still regularly shows up in Mario games (while both characters discussed here were removed from their own debut game, presumably because Nintendo and/or Rare and its current corporate owner did not want to show the franchises as being related) and while yes, the Wario franchise is pretty far removed from the Mario games in a lot of ways, the first Wario Land game was directly branded as a continuation of the Super Mario Land series and involves characters and concept from the Mario universe in its storyline. It's not the same situation at all.
| |
|
| |
| Furthermore, giving Banjo and Conker coverage leads to a weird rabbit-hole of including things that were never promoted or created as derivatives of the ''Super Mario'' games, but that share some sublte connections. Stuff like "Well, if you include Banjo and Conker, then why don't you give full coverage to For The Frog The Bell Tolls because [[Mad Scienstein|Dr. Awero Stain]] is a major supporting character in Wario Land games?" or "Why don't you give Rhythm Heaven full coverage since recent entries of it and both WarioWare all but say they're in the same fictional universe?". While both scenarios would be hugely entertaining to me, there ''is'' such a thing as casting too wide of a net.
| |
|
| |
| Also, if you're going to invoke authorial intent, Conker's creator Chris Seavor [https://twitter.com/GoryDetail/status/1241106477135298566 recently poo-poo'ed] the idea of Banjo and Conker being in the same universe (and thus, by extension, any other franchises they're theorized sharing a fictional universe with). So yeah. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 09:54, July 31, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Fun fact, Diddy Kong Racing's events are mentioned in Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts, and Mario is referred to in passing as well. Just because Conker's Bad Fur Day may or may not exist in Mario's world, does not mean Banjo or Conker's earlier incarnation does not. [[Special:Contributions/162.219.176.130|162.219.176.130]]
| |
| :Regardless, that does not change the fact that DKR is a crossover with pre-existing ideas, and Banjo and Conker are ''certainly'' not "spinoff" franchises to it just because it ''happened'' to be released first (please recall the principle of production order that get fans of TV shows riled up sometimes). They each get a page, the rest of the respective franchise doesn't. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]])
| |
| ::Also, we're not going to cover every video game series that mentions the Mario series as part of "Mario's World", otherwise we'd have to not only fully cover [[List of Mario references in Nintendo video games|every game series here]] and [[List of Mario references in third-party video games|here]], but every franchise represented in Smash. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 17:56, August 7, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| There are a lot of assumptions being made here, and it does not change the fact that it 'is' a crossover linking all three franchises. Regardless of any circumstances that occurred during the game's development, from a canon point of view this crossover did indeed happen and has been referenced in subsequent games. This is irrefutable. The storyline itself states that Diddy Kong contacted Banjo and Conker directly, if this isn't a clear link between the Donkey Kong and Banjo franchises at the very least, I don't know what is. This can not be compared to "cameos" or "Smash Bros" because those are two wildly different things. I believe the point remains valid that the Banjo-Kazooie games should be considered a part of the Super Mario universe like Wario and Yoshi, at least for the games released on Nintendo consoles. If lack of quality was the primary concern behind the removal of the former "Mushroom World" page, then it's clear that a higher quality alternative should be pursued rather then forming a laundry list of excuses why it shouldn't be. [[Special:Contributions/184.75.210.66|184.75.210.66]]
| |
| :[[MarioWiki:Canonicity|There is no canon]]. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:07, August 8, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| ::Additionally, given it's been stated that Conker and Banjo are not the same "universe," it could just as easily be said that these are a ''different'' Banjo and Conker. Both franchises broke the fourth wall all the time, and ''Nuts & Bolts'' metaphorically demolished its foundation. The continuity for that game and every game in each of these franchises is essentially multiple-choice; note that ''Banjo Pilot'' simply ''can't'' fit into that frranchise's continuity due to its inconsistencies. Regardless, as I said, it's multiple choice, so trying to say "same universe" when they officially aren't is disingenuous at best. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:10, August 8, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :::Did you read Glowsquid's second-to-last paragraph? Even if Banjo and Conker did share the same "universe" with Mario that wouldn't be a good reason to cover their franchises in full on the Mario Wiki since they don't regularly interact with the rest of the series. Unlike Yoshi, Donkey Kong, and Wario, who were specifically created for the Mario series and regularly continue to appear in Mario games along with characters who first appeared in those spinoffs like Kamek and Diddy Kong, Conker hasn't appeared in a single Mario-related game since he first appeared in Diddy Kong Racing, and it took Banjo over two decades to appear in another game alongside Mario characters. And like Doc said, Banjo and Conker weren't created for Diddy Kong Racing, they were included as "special guests" and it became their first appearance by a scheduling fluke. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 17:29, August 8, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| "This can not be compared to "cameos" or "Smash Bros" because those are two wildly different things." I mean, if you had actually checked out the link I posted, you'd have seen someone responded to Seavor with a pic of the Diddy Kong Racing character select screen, to which he respond with [https://twitter.com/GoryDetail/status/1241110643408867328 Are all these from the same universe?"]" and a pic of the SSB Ultimate character select screen. Which indicates that, at least from the position of Conker's creator (and if he isn't qualified to speak about what Conker's fictional universe relates to, who is?), they're infact, The Same Thing.
| |
|
| |
| Also, I'm writing this not because I think it'll convince our anon friend over here (it certainly won't) but because it's something I have thought about and it's something I want to refer back to when there are future talks about coverage, and basically I want to expand on what I said about "casting too wide of a net". And the ''tl:dr'' of it is: The wiki isn't ''really'' about the "Mario fictional universe", or rather it's not primarily about that, and rather it is about ''Mario'' and its derived (and partner) series as a real-word media franchise.
| |
|
| |
| One of our policy page (I think it was Chronology?) had a statement among the lines "We must remember that [[Donkey Kong (game)|Donkey Kong]] is the root of everything we created" and while worded in a corny way, the gist still holds true. The Mario and Donkey Kong characters debuted in the arcade game, Mario soon became popular and spawned a big media franchise, which the wiki is ostensibly about. Then, a good decade later, the Donkey Kong character (actually a separate character, but irrelevant in IP terms and a distinction Nintendo does not always strictly adher to) was rebooted with his own successful video game that did away with pretty much all the old arcade trappings and was distinct from the Mario games of the time. And certainly one could say, ''Donkey Kong'' (or more precisely ''Donkey Kong '''Country''''') is a franchise in its own right and shouldn't be seen as a spin-off subordinate to the Mario series - that's a very fair and valid opinion, but, the shared origin in the 1981 arcade game means it make some sense for a website that call itself "Super Mario Wiki" to also document Donkey Kong stuff. Likewise with Wario, Yoshi etc. who were created ''for'' Mario games, were major actors in those and then spawned their own franchise with varying degress of cross-reference back to the "main" Mario franchise.
| |
|
| |
| I gave Rhythm Heaven as an example of things going too far: Rhythm Heaven includes a lot of clues it's set in the same fictional universe as the WarioWare series (including both Rhythm Heaven Fever and RH Megamix having modes where you play as WarioWare characters) and in turn the two most recent WarioWare games include a lot of cameos from Rhythm Heaven characters and location. Thus, if only fictional connections mattered, it would only make sense to extend the wiki's coverage to the Rhythm Heave series as a whole, right?
| |
|
| |
| But the deal, Rhythm Heaven was not created as a spin-off to WarioWare, or anything else. It started as its own thing (albeit with some quick nods to WarioWare as a result of its shared staff and style), and slowly over time, the two franchises would increasingly reference each-other. But while you can say RH and WW are set in the same fictional universe, you '''can't''' reasonably say Rhythm Heaven is a "Mario spin-off" or even a "WarioWare spin-off", and retroactively making articles for all the Rhythm Heaven games and characters would be a weird and messy leap to make. And by that process, neither are Banjo or Conker. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 17:26, August 11, 2020 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Thought I'd add this to the conversation: https://www.dkvine.com/?p=features&page=what_dku
| |
| {{unsigned|172.83.40.74}}
| |
| :That is a fan-made construct through and through. It’s not relevant here. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 13:33, August 25, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I disagree, I think it holds a lot of credibility since Diddy Kong Racing is an official Nintendo release, and contains characters (like Banjo/Conker) that we would have considered unrelated otherwise. The Donkey Kong connection is also alluded to in the official reveal trailer of Banjo and Kazooie in Smash Bros Ultimate. Not to say that Conker's Bad Fur Day is canon to the Mario Universe (it's not), but I believe that Banjo-Kazooie IS, as well as Conker's original incarnation from Diddy Kong Racing. They are both allies of Donkey and Diddy Kong. I get that there is no official description of Mario's world, nor any detailed map of it's continent and landscape, but I do suggest more detail be added to Banjo's page covering his games, as they should be considered "canon".{{unsigned|172.83.40.74}}
| |
| :Anything fan-made doesn't hold any credibility at all to us. Also, if the games themselves are not within our coverage, then we don't need to fully cover them on Banjo's article either. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 16:38, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::I suggest reading Glowsquid's comment regarding our coverage and how "canon" fits into that. (Also, the Mario franchise [[MarioWiki:Canonicity|has no canon]].) --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 17:33, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::"There are a lot of assumptions being made here, and it does not change the fact that it 'is' a crossover linking all three franchises." Pretty interesting you said assumptions are being made (including the assumption there is a "Super Mario Universe"; there isn't), because I think what Glowsquid is saying is just matter of fact sort of thing. If anything I think you're connecting really loose dots that don't really exist and referring to other constructs from other fans that carry little relevance to the wiki. Due to the shaky foundation, you simply cannot write a quality article that really reflects what MarioWiki is set to do, document things, leave out speculation. "This can not be compared to "cameos" or 'Smash Bros' because those are two wildly different things." This one looks like a circular argument by assertion and special pleading? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 18:25, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I'm not talking about strictly fan-based speculation, I'm going off of official references.I think it's pretty foolish to assume that the Mario universe has no real continuity, it very clearly does in most games not directly produced by Miyamoto. Especially in the RPG games which have clear sequels. Just because there isn't an official Nintendo timeline doesn't mean that these games don't have any continuity to them. Even Mario Odyssey references previous encounters with Bowser, such as the ones in Super Mario World and Mario 64. The way I see it, Banjo deserves a quality article the same way other Donkey Kong characters do. Because for all intents and purposes, he became a Donkey Kong spinoff character, and the first two games were released on a Nintendo platform. No wild fan speculation needed here.{{unsigned|172.83.40.74}}
| |
| :First, please sign your comments with four ~ at the end. Second, although I wasn't part of this discussion before, it looks to me like everyone else here has made it clear enough that Banjo is not a Donkey Kong character, nor is his series even a Donkey Kong spinoff. At this point, this discussion is just going in circles. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 19:35, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Not at all, I haven't recieved a single reasonable explanation why Banjo shouldn't be considered a DK character. I hear claims of "fan speculation", yet in a twist of irony the explanations I'm getting could also be considered "fan speculation". Banjo was always intended as a DK spinoff, and in fact there was even going to be more DIRECT ties with a photo of DK himself being in Banjo's house. The intention from the start was to link these two franchises together, and that coupled with the other official references I mentioned earlier, confirms Banjo and his games as canon. At least those not exclusive to Microsoft consoles. [[Special:Contributions/172.83.40.74|172.83.40.74]] 19:47, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :Is there any valid proof of this, directly from the makers of the games themselves rather than a fan-vine? If so, please link it. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 19:51, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :A photo in the house ''is'' a cameo, as is the supposed cut easter egg of DK appearing as part of the puzzle minigame. Banjo-Kazooie had [[Jiggywikki:Dream: Land of Giants|a very long and varied development period]] (which I may add long predated Diddy Kong Racing's development period), and at no point was it a "spinoff" of DK any more than Banjo-Tooie is a spinoff of Sabre Wulf. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:24, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::”Banjo was always intended as a DK spinoff, and in fact there was even going to be more DIRECT ties with a photo of DK himself being in Banjo's house.”
| |
| ::Fictionally unrelated games sharing cameos of one another isn’t uncommon.
| |
| ::”The intention from the start was to link these two franchises together”
| |
| ::Even if there was, the IPs are quite far removed by now. Ergo, the Banjo-Kazooie series doesn’t warrant coverage. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 20:38, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::You're not really looking at the perspective of the game designers. They do put nods to earlier games for players to pick up on the nostalgia. It's not a comment on continuity as much as a game sprinkling references to other games a lot of players have played. Sure, they reference sometimes, but this doesn't point to any solid ground for an established timeline. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:24, August 26, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| There is less evidence to suggest that Banjo 'isnt' connected, than ones that support his inclusion in the greater Mario universe. Another few tidbits I missed was the "Gnawty" character being included in Click Clock Wood in Banjo-Kazooie, and Banjo's likely relation with the "Brothers' Bear" in DKC3. Sharing a similar naming scheme. With all of this evidence and more, I feel it's foolish not to include Banjo in a greater capacity on this Wiki. I feel the intention both during and after the development of Diddy Kong Racing was to link the two franchises together, as a sort of DK "Expanded Universe" of sorts. [[Special:Contributions/71.19.249.33|71.19.249.33]] 20:35, September 1, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :Donkey Kong appears on ''The Simpsons'' several times. This is enough evidence to support that Kongo Jungle was intended to be in Springfield and thus Homer should get a page, right? {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 21:02, September 1, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::I think yet another point you're missing is that Banjo is not a Nintendo property. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 21:10, September 1, 2021 (EDT)
| |