Editing Talk:Mr. Kipper

The pic for the fish is purple, not green {{User:Lario/sig}} Ur a fish

:That because this is a pic of Mr. Kipper underwater....which makes it look purple. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]

Actauly, I knew that once I went somewhere else {{User:Lario/sig}}

There's also a time Mr. Kipper is out of water at Bowser's Castle and he's green.

===Merge Mr. Kipper to Cheep-Cheep===
{{Settled TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|canceled}} 
We have Spookum merged with Snifit, even though one's black and one's blue. What about these? One's red and one's green (and sometimes purple). We need to merge these. 
{{scroll box|content=
'''Proposer''': {{User|Magikrazy51}}<br>
'''Deadline''': April 16 2011, 23:59 GMT.

====Support====
#{{User|Magikrazy51}} Per my proposal.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Hmmm. No reason those are split. Per the three thousand ultra Marios and the fifty-one crazy magics.
#{{User|SWFlash}} It even stays at the first place: "''They're green when on surface''".

====Oppose==== 
#{{User|Zero777}} You're forgetting the point that Mr. Kipper is a sub-species of Cheep-Cheeps and that its stats and attacks are different from Goby's (Cheep-Cheep's) stats and attacks. Also your argument is quite invalid since Spookum is infact a Snifit, but for some reason the name was changed to Spookum when translated to the English version, Mr. Kipper is not a Cheep-Cheep, but a sub-species.
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} Per Zero this doesn't seem necessary and it doesn't make sense that if it were a Cheep-Cheep that it would different stats than a Goby which is also just a Cheep-Cheep
#{{User|Glowsquid}} - Per Zero.
#{{User|Reversinator}} Per all.
#{{User|Nicke8}} Per Zero777/
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} I feel sometimes as if some of us only joined to merge all of our articles together.
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per Zero: different species get different pages.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per all.
#{{User|Bop1996}} Per Zero.

====Comments and Queries====
The name was changed to Spookum? No, the Spookum is a sub-species since Spookums and Snifits appear in the same game, together even (no Snagglepuss reference intended). There's 3 (or 8) Snifits and the rest are Spookums, so unless the 3 (or 8) Snifits were literally named Snifit 1, Snifit 2, etc., which I highly doubt, or unless Booster gave all Snifits blue robes and renamed them Spookums, my case is rested.{{User|Magikrazy51}}

that may be true but right now we have Spookum and Snifit merged and Cheep-Cheep already have there own article in Super Mario Rpg it's called a Goby why would they be both {{User|Iggykoopa}}

'''@Magikrazy51:''' It's more complicated then that. Spookums are snifits, not a sub-species, and for some dumb reason I guess they renamed them in the English version not to confuse players. How do you think Cheep-Cheep and Goby and Lava Bubble and Podoboo got merged together. And if you don't believe me, check out the snifit article. {{User|Zero777}}

Where do Booster's Snifits called "Snifits" fit in? Thanks for answering. {{User|Magikrazy51}}
:It doesn't matter if he calls them snifits. Snifits and Spookums are the EXACT same coding, but with different color, no more. Read the Snifit article in the SMRPG section. {{User|Zero777}}
::Yay! Someone mentioned coding! All joking aside, I think the merging/splitting is getting out of hand. We ''really'' need some sort of policy on what deserves an article and what doesn't... {{User:Bop1996/sig}} 13:09, 7 April 2011 (EDT)
:::That kind of policy would probably be really subjective. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 13:15, 7 April 2011 (EDT)
::::Now that I think about it, this was a dumb proposal. Can an sysop or whoever deletes proposals delete this? {{User|Magikrazy51}}
:::::Sure. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 11:39, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
}}