Editing Talk:Mousersaurus Rex
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge this article to [[Mouser (The Super Mario Bros. Super Show!)]]== | ==Merge this article to [[Mouser (The Super Mario Bros. Super Show!)]]== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
It is said that Mousersaurus Rex is a dinosaur version of Mouser. But why should Mousersaurus Rex have its own article? It's basically an alias for Mouser himself. If Mousersaurus Rex should have its own article then maybe King Koopa's aliases, like Pirate Koopa or Darth Koopa should have their own articles as well. I suggest we merge this article to Mouser's article and include Mousersaurus Rex as an alias to Mouser himself. | It is said that Mousersaurus Rex is a dinosaur version of Mouser. But why should Mousersaurus Rex have its own article? It's basically an alias for Mouser himself. If Mousersaurus Rex should have its own article then maybe King Koopa's aliases, like Pirate Koopa or Darth Koopa should have their own articles as well. I suggest we merge this article to Mouser's article and include Mousersaurus Rex as an alias to Mouser himself. | ||
Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
#[[User:Char89Charizard|Char89Charizard]] ([[User talk:Char89Charizard|talk]]) Mouser's aliases shouldn't have their own articles. They're basically the same character, much like King Koopa is with his aliases. I don't remember seeing any other article about any of Mouser's or King Koopa's aliases. | #[[User:Char89Charizard|Char89Charizard]] ([[User talk:Char89Charizard|talk]]) Mouser's aliases shouldn't have their own articles. They're basically the same character, much like King Koopa is with his aliases. I don't remember seeing any other article about any of Mouser's or King Koopa's aliases. | ||
#{{User|Niiue}} Per proposal. | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} This is more of a stand-in than an alias - the Toad character takes his book near the beginning of the episode, opens to Cowazaurus and then flips to Mouseraurus (which he audibly reads as "Mousersaurus Rex"), so it's supposed to be a documented species of Caveman Land. | #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} This is more of a stand-in than an alias - the Toad character takes his book near the beginning of the episode, opens to Cowazaurus and then flips to Mouseraurus (which he audibly reads as "Mousersaurus Rex"), so it's supposed to be a documented species of Caveman Land. | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} - I'm going to say no. The two are very clearly different species, this just has the head of a Mouser. It looks and acts differently, plus its name is officially different. The only thing related to Mouser is its head. | #{{User|Alex95}} - I'm going to say no. The two are very clearly different species, this just has the head of a Mouser. It looks and acts differently, plus its name is officially different. The only thing related to Mouser is its head. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} I wouldn't argue that he's a different character per-se than Mouser, which I do agree if that was the only point of merge (if he had the same name, I'd support the merge), but I feel this is treated like a power-up or alias of a character in the same manner as Mr. L so thus gets his own article. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} I wouldn't argue that he's a different character per-se than Mouser, which I do agree if that was the only point of merge (if he had the same name, I'd support the merge), but I feel this is treated like a power-up or alias of a character in the same manner as Mr. L so thus gets his own article. | ||
#{{User|LuigiMaster123}} Per all. | #{{User|LuigiMaster123}} Per all. | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 41: | Line 38: | ||
:::::Stubs are not short articles at all. Stubs are articles that are lacking information. If an article has all of the necessary and relevant information, it is not a stub. The wiki also has no problems with having short articles, and the number of derived species that exist for a given subject does not affect whether or not they receive individual articles in the slightest. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 14:14, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | :::::Stubs are not short articles at all. Stubs are articles that are lacking information. If an article has all of the necessary and relevant information, it is not a stub. The wiki also has no problems with having short articles, and the number of derived species that exist for a given subject does not affect whether or not they receive individual articles in the slightest. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 14:14, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
::::::Well the article is claimed to be a stub, so I don't even know what else it needs. And I'm still going on my opinion about this. [[User:Char89Charizard|Char89Charizard]] ([[User talk:Char89Charizard|talk]]) 14:20, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ::::::Well the article is claimed to be a stub, so I don't even know what else it needs. And I'm still going on my opinion about this. [[User:Char89Charizard|Char89Charizard]] ([[User talk:Char89Charizard|talk]]) 14:20, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Pink-eared Mouser and Green-Eared Mouser seem to be separate, as does the White Mouser. And ''[[Mario and the Beanstalk]]'' apparently had two Mousers | :::::::Pink-eared Mouser and Green-Eared Mouser seem to be separate, as does the White Mouser. And ''[[Mario and the Beanstalk]]'' apparently had two Mousers. If we merge those Mousers' we should probably merge Klump and Krusha with their respective character articles. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:13, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||