Editing Talk:Mega Mushroom

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{award-winner
|year=second
|#=17
|award=Favorite Mario Kart Item
|presenter=RAP
}}
==Green Mushroom==
==Green Mushroom==
Why is that green image of that mushroom is there if it has the own article. Isn't called the '''Super Mega Mushroom''' [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]] 19:01, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
Why is that green image of that mushroom is there if it has the own article. Isn't called the '''Super Mega Mushroom''' [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]] 19:01, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
Line 6: Line 12:
Nonono, thats what it looked like in Mario Party 4. It looked different then. [[User:GreenKoopa|GreenKoopa]] - [[User talk:GreenKoopa|Comments or questions?]]
Nonono, thats what it looked like in Mario Party 4. It looked different then. [[User:GreenKoopa|GreenKoopa]] - [[User talk:GreenKoopa|Comments or questions?]]
==Split the Mario Party 4 Mega Mushroom from this Page==
==Split the Mario Party 4 Mega Mushroom from this Page==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{SettledTPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|failed|2-7|keep merged}}  
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|2-7}}  
Currently, we have the Mario Party 4 and New Super Mario Bros. versions of the Mega Mushroom here. According to this Page, the Mega Mushroom's Japanese name is 巨大キノコ
Currently, we have the Mario Party 4 and New Super Mario Bros. versions of the Mega Mushroom here. According to this Page, the Mega Mushroom's Japanese name is 巨大キノコ
(Kyodaikinoko, Huge Mushroom). This is possibly the NSMB version, because of the Japanese name of Mega Mario on [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/a2dj/newmario/index.html this page of the Japanese NSMB site]. But according to [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ngc/gmpj/new/index.html this page of the Japanese Mario Party 4 site], it isn't the same as the Mario Party 4 version (I guess), where the MP4 version is called デカキノコ (Dekakinoko (Deka is a Japanese word to describe something large)). As the appearances of both Mushrooms are also different (NSMB version is very huge and has a even bigger yellow cap (with red spots), MP4 version is normal-sized, and green-capped (with white spots)), and we've done several splits and merges because of the Japanese names before, I think this should be split as well.
(Kyodaikinoko, Huge Mushroom). This is possibly the NSMB version, because of the Japanese name of Mega Mario on [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/a2dj/newmario/index.html this page of the Japanese NSMB site]. But according to [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ngc/gmpj/new/index.html this page of the Japanese Mario Party 4 site], it isn't the same as the Mario Party 4 version (I guess), where the MP4 version is called デカキノコ (Dekakinoko (Deka is a Japanese word to describe something large)). As the appearances of both Mushrooms are also different (NSMB version is very huge and has a even bigger yellow cap (with red spots), MP4 version is normal-sized, and green-capped (with white spots)), and we've done several splits and merges because of the Japanese names before, I think this should be split as well.
Line 46: Line 52:


==Split pre-''New Super Mario Bros.'' Mega and Mini Mushrooms from their post-''New Super Mario Bros.'' counterparts, take 2==
==Split pre-''New Super Mario Bros.'' Mega and Mini Mushrooms from their post-''New Super Mario Bros.'' counterparts, take 2==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|failed|9-13|Do not split}}


While this proposal also concerns [[Mini Mushroom]], these two articles currently have identical issues and I think it is more than justified to cover them both in a single talk page proposal.
While this proposal also concerns [[Mini Mushroom]], these two articles currently have identical issues and I think it is more than justified to cover them both in a single talk page proposal.
Line 64: Line 69:


'''Proposer''': {{User|Pseudo}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Pseudo}}<br>
'''Deadline''': <s>December 27, 2023, 23:59 GMT</s> <s>Extended to January 3, 2024, 23:59 GMT</s> Extended to January 10, 2024, 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline''': December 27, 2023, 23:59 GMT


===Support===
===Support===
Line 74: Line 79:
#{{User|Mushroom Head}} Per all. Their counterparts are too different.
#{{User|Mushroom Head}} Per all. Their counterparts are too different.
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all.
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all.
#{{User|DrippingYellow}} For consistency with the previously mentioned ''Mario Party'' [[Star (Mario Party series)|Stars]].
#{{User|BubbleRevolution}} Per all. Different Japanese names, different appearances, they're clearly not the same item, just items with a similar idea.
<strike>#{{User|Pseudo}} Per proposal.</strike>
<strike>#{{User|Pseudo}} Per proposal.</strike>


Line 84: Line 87:
#{{User|Ninja Squid}} Per all. Furthermore, for my personal point of view, I would much rather keep items with a similar name together for ease of reading and searching than having them splitted apart, creating more of a mess to try and find what you are exactly looking for. For simplicity's sake, keep things together than having multiple pages for pretty much the same item.
#{{User|Ninja Squid}} Per all. Furthermore, for my personal point of view, I would much rather keep items with a similar name together for ease of reading and searching than having them splitted apart, creating more of a mess to try and find what you are exactly looking for. For simplicity's sake, keep things together than having multiple pages for pretty much the same item.
#{{User|Pseudo}} Upon seeing the counterarguments to this, particularly in the comments, I’m thinking that this proposal was always a mistake on my part. Apologies to all involved. That said, I will still take full responsibility for the proposal if it passes and I don’t think that splitting would be a ''complete'' mistake or disaster for the wiki, just something that is not really necessary and a bit overcomplicated.
#{{User|Pseudo}} Upon seeing the counterarguments to this, particularly in the comments, I’m thinking that this proposal was always a mistake on my part. Apologies to all involved. That said, I will still take full responsibility for the proposal if it passes and I don’t think that splitting would be a ''complete'' mistake or disaster for the wiki, just something that is not really necessary and a bit overcomplicated.
#{{User|MegaBowser64}} Per all. We don't need to have these split. They might be created differently but they are just different iterations of the same items.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Per all.
#{{User|Sdman213}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} Per all, if only so this proposal doesn't take over a month to end with no consensus.
#{{User|Dark-Boy-1up}} It is not necessary to split up two items with the same name and general idea. Per all.
#{{User|Mario}} Welp, I'll admit ''Mario Pinball Land'' did something useful for once. Per LinkTheLefty
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.


===Comments===
===Comments===
Line 115: Line 110:
:::::I'd also like to add that the Ice Flower's appearance from volume 5 of Super Mario-kun almost definitely did not influence the current iteration being added to Partners in Time 13 years later, but we keep all of that on one page. (I think NSMBW also treated the Ice Flower as a new power-up even though it was already in two other games. In that case, it was that version of Ice Mario that was new, not the flower.) To be fair, the Japanese name is the same as far as we know and it basically kept the design, but an element-swapped Fire Flower is such a basic concept it'd be even weirder if they were different. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:23, December 19, 2023 (EST)
:::::I'd also like to add that the Ice Flower's appearance from volume 5 of Super Mario-kun almost definitely did not influence the current iteration being added to Partners in Time 13 years later, but we keep all of that on one page. (I think NSMBW also treated the Ice Flower as a new power-up even though it was already in two other games. In that case, it was that version of Ice Mario that was new, not the flower.) To be fair, the Japanese name is the same as far as we know and it basically kept the design, but an element-swapped Fire Flower is such a basic concept it'd be even weirder if they were different. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:23, December 19, 2023 (EST)
:::::: OK, honestly, these are very strong arguments to me and I’m beginning to regret having created this proposal to begin with. These are not as fundamentally different as I may have thought, especially with the Arcade GP throughline. I may retract support on my own proposal here. The Ice Flower is what really got me here. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 12:50, December 19, 2023 (EST)
:::::: OK, honestly, these are very strong arguments to me and I’m beginning to regret having created this proposal to begin with. These are not as fundamentally different as I may have thought, especially with the Arcade GP throughline. I may retract support on my own proposal here. The Ice Flower is what really got me here. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 12:50, December 19, 2023 (EST)
::::::: There's also the issue of the [[Super Mushroom]] in ''[[Super Mario 64 DS]]'' itself acting as a functional precursor to the Mega Mushroom, down to the forms they give being functionally near-identical. To say nothing of the [[Big Mushroom]], which also follows a similar function but remains split. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 16:26, December 26, 2023 (EST)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)