Editing Talk:Mega Mushroom
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{award-winner | |||
|year=second | |||
|#=17 | |||
|award=Favorite Mario Kart Item | |||
|presenter=RAP | |||
}} | |||
==Green Mushroom== | ==Green Mushroom== | ||
Why is that green image of that mushroom is there if it has the own article. Isn't called the '''Super Mega Mushroom''' [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]] 19:01, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | Why is that green image of that mushroom is there if it has the own article. Isn't called the '''Super Mega Mushroom''' [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]] 19:01, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Line 6: | Line 12: | ||
Nonono, thats what it looked like in Mario Party 4. It looked different then. [[User:GreenKoopa|GreenKoopa]] - [[User talk:GreenKoopa|Comments or questions?]] | Nonono, thats what it looked like in Mario Party 4. It looked different then. [[User:GreenKoopa|GreenKoopa]] - [[User talk:GreenKoopa|Comments or questions?]] | ||
==Split the Mario Party 4 Mega Mushroom from this Page== | ==Split the Mario Party 4 Mega Mushroom from this Page== | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ | {{ProposalOutcome|failed|2-7}} | ||
Currently, we have the Mario Party 4 and New Super Mario Bros. versions of the Mega Mushroom here. According to this Page, the Mega Mushroom's Japanese name is 巨大キノコ | Currently, we have the Mario Party 4 and New Super Mario Bros. versions of the Mega Mushroom here. According to this Page, the Mega Mushroom's Japanese name is 巨大キノコ | ||
(Kyodaikinoko, Huge Mushroom). This is possibly the NSMB version, because of the Japanese name of Mega Mario on [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/a2dj/newmario/index.html this page of the Japanese NSMB site]. But according to [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ngc/gmpj/new/index.html this page of the Japanese Mario Party 4 site], it isn't the same as the Mario Party 4 version (I guess), where the MP4 version is called デカキノコ (Dekakinoko (Deka is a Japanese word to describe something large)). As the appearances of both Mushrooms are also different (NSMB version is very huge and has a even bigger yellow cap (with red spots), MP4 version is normal-sized, and green-capped (with white spots)), and we've done several splits and merges because of the Japanese names before, I think this should be split as well. | (Kyodaikinoko, Huge Mushroom). This is possibly the NSMB version, because of the Japanese name of Mega Mario on [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/a2dj/newmario/index.html this page of the Japanese NSMB site]. But according to [http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ngc/gmpj/new/index.html this page of the Japanese Mario Party 4 site], it isn't the same as the Mario Party 4 version (I guess), where the MP4 version is called デカキノコ (Dekakinoko (Deka is a Japanese word to describe something large)). As the appearances of both Mushrooms are also different (NSMB version is very huge and has a even bigger yellow cap (with red spots), MP4 version is normal-sized, and green-capped (with white spots)), and we've done several splits and merges because of the Japanese names before, I think this should be split as well. | ||
Line 46: | Line 52: | ||
==Split pre-''New Super Mario Bros.'' Mega and Mini Mushrooms from their post-''New Super Mario Bros.'' counterparts, take 2== | ==Split pre-''New Super Mario Bros.'' Mega and Mini Mushrooms from their post-''New Super Mario Bros.'' counterparts, take 2== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
While this proposal also concerns [[Mini Mushroom]], these two articles currently have identical issues and I think it is more than justified to cover them both in a single talk page proposal. | While this proposal also concerns [[Mini Mushroom]], these two articles currently have identical issues and I think it is more than justified to cover them both in a single talk page proposal. | ||
Line 64: | Line 69: | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Pseudo}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|Pseudo}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': | '''Deadline''': December 27, 2023, 23:59 GMT | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
Line 74: | Line 79: | ||
#{{User|Mushroom Head}} Per all. Their counterparts are too different. | #{{User|Mushroom Head}} Per all. Their counterparts are too different. | ||
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all. | #{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all. | ||
<strike>#{{User|Pseudo}} Per proposal.</strike> | <strike>#{{User|Pseudo}} Per proposal.</strike> | ||
Line 84: | Line 87: | ||
#{{User|Ninja Squid}} Per all. Furthermore, for my personal point of view, I would much rather keep items with a similar name together for ease of reading and searching than having them splitted apart, creating more of a mess to try and find what you are exactly looking for. For simplicity's sake, keep things together than having multiple pages for pretty much the same item. | #{{User|Ninja Squid}} Per all. Furthermore, for my personal point of view, I would much rather keep items with a similar name together for ease of reading and searching than having them splitted apart, creating more of a mess to try and find what you are exactly looking for. For simplicity's sake, keep things together than having multiple pages for pretty much the same item. | ||
#{{User|Pseudo}} Upon seeing the counterarguments to this, particularly in the comments, I’m thinking that this proposal was always a mistake on my part. Apologies to all involved. That said, I will still take full responsibility for the proposal if it passes and I don’t think that splitting would be a ''complete'' mistake or disaster for the wiki, just something that is not really necessary and a bit overcomplicated. | #{{User|Pseudo}} Upon seeing the counterarguments to this, particularly in the comments, I’m thinking that this proposal was always a mistake on my part. Apologies to all involved. That said, I will still take full responsibility for the proposal if it passes and I don’t think that splitting would be a ''complete'' mistake or disaster for the wiki, just something that is not really necessary and a bit overcomplicated. | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 115: | Line 110: | ||
:::::I'd also like to add that the Ice Flower's appearance from volume 5 of Super Mario-kun almost definitely did not influence the current iteration being added to Partners in Time 13 years later, but we keep all of that on one page. (I think NSMBW also treated the Ice Flower as a new power-up even though it was already in two other games. In that case, it was that version of Ice Mario that was new, not the flower.) To be fair, the Japanese name is the same as far as we know and it basically kept the design, but an element-swapped Fire Flower is such a basic concept it'd be even weirder if they were different. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:23, December 19, 2023 (EST) | :::::I'd also like to add that the Ice Flower's appearance from volume 5 of Super Mario-kun almost definitely did not influence the current iteration being added to Partners in Time 13 years later, but we keep all of that on one page. (I think NSMBW also treated the Ice Flower as a new power-up even though it was already in two other games. In that case, it was that version of Ice Mario that was new, not the flower.) To be fair, the Japanese name is the same as far as we know and it basically kept the design, but an element-swapped Fire Flower is such a basic concept it'd be even weirder if they were different. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:23, December 19, 2023 (EST) | ||
:::::: OK, honestly, these are very strong arguments to me and I’m beginning to regret having created this proposal to begin with. These are not as fundamentally different as I may have thought, especially with the Arcade GP throughline. I may retract support on my own proposal here. The Ice Flower is what really got me here. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 12:50, December 19, 2023 (EST) | :::::: OK, honestly, these are very strong arguments to me and I’m beginning to regret having created this proposal to begin with. These are not as fundamentally different as I may have thought, especially with the Arcade GP throughline. I may retract support on my own proposal here. The Ice Flower is what really got me here. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 12:50, December 19, 2023 (EST) | ||