Editing Talk:Mattermouth
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Stop considering Mattermouths as Dry Bones== | ==Stop considering Mattermouths as Dry Bones== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
They look nothing like a Dry Bones, i don't understand why there that kind of species. | They look nothing like a Dry Bones, i don't understand why there that kind of species. | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Randombob-omb4761}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|Randombob-omb4761}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': | '''Deadline''': January 16, 2014, 23:59 GMT | ||
====Support==== | ====Support==== | ||
Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} They have different appearances and purposes. The only thing really similar is that they're skeleton-like and they have the same eye-style. (yellow glowing pupil against black) | #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} They have different appearances and purposes. The only thing really similar is that they're skeleton-like and they have the same eye-style. (yellow glowing pupil against black) | ||
#{{User|Mario}} I'll support because we shouldn't use a blanket term of "Dry Bones" to refer to any animated reptilian skeleton; Bone Dragon and Spine Coasters (especially the one in ''Super Mario 3D Land'') are apparently not considered Dry Bones, yet they resemble Dry Bones as much as Mattermouths or more, so Mattermouths should not be considered Dry Bones either. | #{{User|Mario}} I'll support because we shouldn't use a blanket term of "Dry Bones" to refer to any animated reptilian skeleton; Bone Dragon and Spine Coasters (especially the one in ''Super Mario 3D Land'') are apparently not considered Dry Bones, yet they resemble Dry Bones as much as Mattermouths or more, so Mattermouths should not be considered Dry Bones either. | ||
#{{User|WooftheChomp}} they are different from dry bones because i have seen them myself | |||
#{{User|Megadardery}} Per LGM (a.k.a Mario). And per my comments. | #{{User|Megadardery}} Per LGM (a.k.a Mario). And per my comments. | ||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - They look like Dry Bones skulls so it's not illogical, and lumping them together is good for organization. It doesn't need to be a ''perfect'' fit, and the article merely says there's a "resembl[ance]" anyway. | #{{User|Walkazo}} - They look like Dry Bones skulls so it's not illogical, and lumping them together is good for organization. It doesn't need to be a ''perfect'' fit, and the article merely says there's a "resembl[ance]" anyway. | ||
#{{User|KP}} A note to the proposer- their skull looks similar to the Dry Bones's and they have no flesh, so saying that they look nothing like one doesn't make much sense, does it? | #{{User|KP}} A note to the proposer- their skull looks similar to the Dry Bones's and they have no flesh, so saying that they look nothing like one doesn't make much sense, does it? | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Line 43: | Line 31: | ||
::With the exception of [[Spine Coaster]] (whilst I don't like it very much either), I don't agree. As I said before, a resemblance is not enough to warrant them as a sub-species, especially that Mattermouth, Bone Dragon poorly resemble it anyway. I think that the Undead category fits them better than the Dry Bones category.--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 07:32, 3 January 2014 (EST) | ::With the exception of [[Spine Coaster]] (whilst I don't like it very much either), I don't agree. As I said before, a resemblance is not enough to warrant them as a sub-species, especially that Mattermouth, Bone Dragon poorly resemble it anyway. I think that the Undead category fits them better than the Dry Bones category.--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 07:32, 3 January 2014 (EST) | ||
:::I agree as well. We can go through the route where Dry Bones is a blanket term for skeleton reptilian beings, but this will be speculation territory, and it's easier to say they're NOT Dry Bones rather than they are. NOT being Dry Bones is not as definite as the affirmative.<br> {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 12:54, 3 January 2014 (EST) | :::I agree as well. We can go through the route where Dry Bones is a blanket term for skeleton reptilian beings, but this will be speculation territory, and it's easier to say they're NOT Dry Bones rather than they are. NOT being Dry Bones is not as definite as the affirmative.<br> {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 12:54, 3 January 2014 (EST) | ||