Editing Talk:Mario Bros.-e

== Merge ==
{{talk}}
As far as I know, the e-Reader games are exact ports of the NES games, so this should be merged with ''[[Mario Bros. (game)|Mario Bros.]]''. We also merged the [[Classic NES Series]] with the respective original games. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:38, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't Merge it with the NES version.{{User:Dark Lakitu 789/sig}}
:this article is a stub so it should be merged into it {{User:Red Shell 68066vr/sig}}
::Just because something is a stub, it doesn't mean it needs to be merged. There's something called expanding, you know. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}
:::This game is the same as the NES version, though, just on a different platform. There is no reason for a separate article. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:36, 18 February 2010 (EST)

it should merge because it is considered as a remake of the game {{unsigned|SuperGamerX17}}
:I wouldn't even consider it a remake. It is just an emulation of the NES game. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 12:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree to merge it. It is the EXACT SAME as the NES version, only on a GameBoy Advance E-Reader. Indeed, there is no reason for the E-Reader version to have it's own article. --[[User:Killer Axe|Killer Axe]]

==Merge==
{{TPP}}
As you can see in the comments above, this is mostly an emulation and '''not''' a remake. I propose that we should merge them.

'''Proposer''':{{User|Its-a-me Yoshi!}}<br>
'''Deadline''': 23:59, 27 November 2010 GMT

====Merge====
#{{User|Its-a-me Yoshi!}} Per Proposal.
#{{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! Per comments above. Zero signing out.
#{{User|MarioManiac}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Garlic Stapler}} Per proposal
====Don't Merge====

====Comments====
Remember this is an '''emulation'''. Its an '''exact''' port from the [[NES]] version. I can see why [[SMAS+SMW]] was split, but I can't see why this was split if its the same game on a different port.--{{User:Its-a-me Yoshi!/sig}}

We have an Article for [[Mario Party-e]] so we should keep this one. {{User:Fuzzipede27/sig}}

@ Fuzzipede27 Yes, we have an article for [[Mario Party-e]] because '''it is its own game'''. Mario Bros.-e is just a port.-{{User:Its-a-me Yoshi!/sig}}

I confirm this as I actually have it on my eReader along with Donkey Kong jr. and a few pokemon ereader games. {{User|Garlic Stapler}}
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Merge ==
+{{talk}}
 As far as I know, the e-Reader games are exact ports of the NES games, so this should be merged with ''[[Mario Bros. (game)|Mario Bros.]]''. We also merged the [[Classic NES Series]] with the respective original games. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:38, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==Merge==
-{{Settled TPP}}
+{{TPP}}
-{{Proposal outcome|passed|11-0|merge}}
 As you can see in the comments above, this is mostly an emulation and '''not''' a remake. I propose that we should merge them.
@@ Line 26: / Line 25: @@
 #{{User|MarioManiac}} Per proposal.
 #{{User|Garlic Stapler}} Per proposal
-#{{User|JF}} Per all.
-#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per all.
-#{{User|M&SG}} - Article should be merged. Emulated games don't require separate articles.
-#{{User|SWFlash}} No differences
-#{{User|Edofenrir}} - Per M&SG.
-#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} Per all.
-#{{User|Mario Fan 123}} - Per Luigi and per all.
 ====Don't Merge====
@@ Line 44: / Line 35: @@
 I confirm this as I actually have it on my eReader along with Donkey Kong jr. and a few pokemon ereader games. {{User|Garlic Stapler}}
-I think it doesn't  need a specific article, because the [[Super Mario Advance]] games were packed into the same articles as the originals and this one practically is in the same state as the SMA games and so there shouldn't be an extra article for this one!
--[[Freakworld]]