Editing Talk:Mario's helicopter
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Article seems unnecessary == | == Article seems unnecessary == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
This article is about two completely unconnected, unnamed helicopters that both happen to be owned by Mario. Need I say more? This article has even less of a reason to exist than Donkey Kong's cage in ''DK Junior'', an arguably more pervasive plot element that doesn't even have an article for... hopefully obvious reasons. It says something that even in the anarchic early days of MarioWiki, nobody seemed to have thought to make an article for ''Mario's helicopter''. This is really stretching the exceptions given in the [[MarioWiki:Generic_subjects|generic subject policy]]. [[User:DrippingYellow|DrippingYellow]] ([[User talk:DrippingYellow|talk]]) 12:59, June 7, 2024 (EDT) | This article is about two completely unconnected, unnamed helicopters that both happen to be owned by Mario. Need I say more? This article has even less of a reason to exist than Donkey Kong's cage in ''DK Junior'', an arguably more pervasive plot element that doesn't even have an article for... hopefully obvious reasons. It says something that even in the anarchic early days of MarioWiki, nobody seemed to have thought to make an article for ''Mario's helicopter''. This is really stretching the exceptions given in the [[MarioWiki:Generic_subjects|generic subject policy]]. [[User:DrippingYellow|DrippingYellow]] ([[User talk:DrippingYellow|talk]]) 12:59, June 7, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:[[File:MKSC Luigi Blimp.png]] | :[[File:MKSC Luigi Blimp.png]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
==Proposal to finally end Mario's helicopter's reign of terror== | ==Proposal to finally end Mario's helicopter's reign of terror== | ||
Given the lack of action from the admins (despite at least one of them participating in the relevant conversation, (or were they just a wiki patroller? not sure)), as well as the fact that this article is still regularly updated by its creator, I believe this is the intended avenue for us to get rid of this article. | Given the lack of action from the admins (despite at least one of them participating in the relevant conversation, (or were they just a wiki patroller? not sure)), as well as the fact that this article is still regularly updated by its creator, I believe this is the intended avenue for us to get rid of this article. | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} These are two entirely distinct helicopters, neither of which strikes us as being important enough to have their own article, and combining them together doesn't help matters. Per proposal. | #{{User|Camwoodstock}} These are two entirely distinct helicopters, neither of which strikes us as being important enough to have their own article, and combining them together doesn't help matters. Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|YoYo}} just because they're helicopters doesn't mean they're exactly the same one. | #{{User|YoYo}} just because they're helicopters doesn't mean they're exactly the same one. | ||
===Noooo! Not my helicopter! (Oppose)=== | ===Noooo! Not my helicopter! (Oppose)=== | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||