| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| [[User:Mariofanical|Mariofanical]] | | [[User:Mariofanical|Mariofanical]] |
| :Theres official art work of them, isn't that enough? {{User:Uniju :D/sig}} | | :Theres official art work of them, isn't that enough? {{User:Uniju :D/sig}} |
| Okay, I saw one for less than a second in [http://media.wii.ign.com/media/748/748588/vid_2195293.html this video]. I also saw one in the story about Rosalina in the same video.
| |
|
| |
| And in the same video I saw a PINK normal one that isn't carrying anything next to either the '''Garage''' or the '''Kitchen.
| |
|
| |
| So there is:
| |
| 1. Yellow Baby Luma which owns the [[Spring Star]] and [[Star Ring]].
| |
| 2. Blue Baby Luma which owns the [[Beam Star]].
| |
| 3. Red Baby Luma which owns the [[Red Star]].
| |
| 4. Green Baby Luma which I've only seen for 0.58 of a second and was really small because it was far away.
| |
| 5. Pink Baby Luma which I've only seen for a few seconds next to a [[Dome]].
| |
| 6. White Baby Luma like [[Luma (character)|Tyke]] who can perform a [[Spinning|Star Spin]].
| |
| 7. Pink Adult Luma, carrying [[Star Bit]]s because it feeds on them, being able to create a new planet.
| |
| 8. Blue Adult Luma, carrying a [[Super Mushroom]], and a [[1-Up Mushroom]], who sells beneficial items to [[Mario]].
| |
| 9. Purple Adult Luma, carrying [[Star]]s, and does "who knows what" because I saw it for only a few seconds too.{{unsigned|Mariofanical}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Green Luma, and something else...==
| |
|
| |
| The green Lumas appear when you get a [[Green Power Star]]. There's Six green Lumas.
| |
|
| |
| But I have something else to say. Where does the white Luma appear "Alive on a small Planet?" I never saw that in the game. '''[[User:Infecto|InfectedShroom.]]'''[[Image:infectoicon.png]]
| |
|
| |
| You'll see when you beaten the game complete it with all 121 stars playing as Luigi. [[User:Princess Butterfly|Princess Butterfly]] 15:29, 24 November 2007 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :Ah. I see. Thanks. '''[[User:Infecto|InfectedShroom.]]'''[[Image:infectoicon.png]]
| |
|
| |
| ==Article==
| |
| Should we make an article on Hungry Lumas?{{User:SpikeKnifeNeedleSword/sig}} 23:28, 7 December 2007 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==Artwork==
| |
| Should we add Rosalina's artwork in mario kart wii on the article because a luma is with her.
| |
| [[User: Supersmashbrosbrawl]]
| |
|
| |
| ==Move to Luma (character)==
| |
| I think so, and put the species page back to just Luma. -- [[User:Booster|Booster]]
| |
|
| |
| But Luma is a character as well as a species. The same thing has been done to Birdo's article, Yoshi's article and Toad's article. Luma deserves his own page too!--[[User:Magikoopa67|Magikoopa67]] 10:12, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| But the Luma species as a whole seems to be more known than the character in this case. There were Lumas everywhere in Galaxy. -- [[User:Booster|Booster]]
| |
|
| |
| I don't think so, Luma's is Mario's partener in the game and is just as well known as his species.--[[User:Magikoopa67|Magikoopa67]] 17:49, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Hmm. But the other Lumas are still important, such as Polari. Maybe keep the species page where it is, move the character to Luma (character), and make Luma a disambiguation page. -- [[User:Booster|Booster]]
| |
| :A two-subject disambiguation page is a little too short for such a major topic. I think that it should be [[Luma]] for the species and [[Luma (character)]] for the character. [[User:C Teng|C Teng]] [[User talk:C Teng|<sup>[talk]</sup>]] 11:43, 2 November 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Is this page needed? ==
| |
|
| |
| Honestly, there are only two things on this page; the character and the species, which i don't think is enough for a disambiguation article. I think it would make sense to delete it and put the [[Template:about|about template]] in the respective articles. Please let me know what you think. {{User:YoshiEgg1990/sig}} 14:25, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :I say it's needed, since "Luma" is referring to one of two things, both of equal importance. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 14:28, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::While true, [[Toad]] is not called {{fake link|Toad (character)}}, [[Birdo]] is not called {{fake link|Birdo (character)}}... And so many others. Why is [[Luma (character)]] different? {{User:YoshiEgg1990/sig}} 14:32, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::Because Luma (character) isn't more notable than the other. [[Bob-omb (character)]] doesn't take priority over [[Bob-omb]] ((species)). And there are many others like that. Maybe the species is a little more notable, but even then, I don't think it's notable enough. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 14:40, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Let's approach this a different way: Since they are both pages about minor characters, which should take priority? The species or the character? The plentiful ones or the one that tags with Mario? To make matters even more confusing, there is a playable Luma in ''[[Mario Tennis Open]]'' that isn't the silver one. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 15:04, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Why is Mario's cap/Apricot/etc (silver?) Luma at [[Luma (character)]] anyway? According to the article, it's "Baby Luma" in SMG2 and SSB Wii U. Shouldn't the apricot Luma be moved there?
| |
| :::::As for the MTO yellow "Luma" playable character..., well, the default skin for the "playable" Luma in the "Rosalina & Luma" pair in SSB4 & SSBU is yellow... - [[User:Reboot|Reboot]] ([[User talk:Reboot|talk]]) 15:14, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::According to the manual. The ones in-game are (young-in most) master [[File:SMG Luma.jpg|25px]] Luma. However, Baby Luma is also the most recent (since it is in SSBfWU). And since he is called young in the actual SMG2 game, I can see that moving to Baby Luma. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 15:58, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::I'm for moving Luma (character) to "Baby Luma" and Luma (species) to here. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 16:08, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::So am I. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 18:50, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::Hm, the characters in SMG and SMG2 always came off as different-yet-similar entities to me. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:22, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Should we list The Super Mario Bros. Movie section on here? ==
| |
| It's because of the fact that [[Lumalee]] has been officially confirmed to be in this movie. I am still wondering if regular Lumas will appear. Keep in mind there are several articles (Goombas, Koopa Troopas, Piranha Plants, etc) that list a different version of characters appearing, so... [[User:MarioBobfan2007'snewaccount|MarioBobfan2007'snewaccount]] ([[User talk:MarioBobfan2007'snewaccount|talk]]) 23:17, March 19, 2023 (EDT)
| |
| :I don't really see any reason not to actually. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 06:25, March 20, 2023 (EDT)
| |
