Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 52: |
Line 52: |
| :I say it's needed, since "Luma" is referring to one of two things, both of equal importance. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 14:28, 26 June 2018 (EDT) | | :I say it's needed, since "Luma" is referring to one of two things, both of equal importance. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 14:28, 26 June 2018 (EDT) |
| ::While true, [[Toad]] is not called {{fake link|Toad (character)}}, [[Birdo]] is not called {{fake link|Birdo (character)}}... And so many others. Why is [[Luma (character)]] different? {{User:YoshiEgg1990/sig}} 14:32, 26 June 2018 (EDT) | | ::While true, [[Toad]] is not called {{fake link|Toad (character)}}, [[Birdo]] is not called {{fake link|Birdo (character)}}... And so many others. Why is [[Luma (character)]] different? {{User:YoshiEgg1990/sig}} 14:32, 26 June 2018 (EDT) |
| :::Because Luma (character) isn't more notable than the other. [[Bob-omb (character)]] doesn't take priority over [[Bob-omb]] ((species)). And there are many others like that. Maybe the species is a little more notable, but even then, I don't think it's notable enough. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 14:40, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Let's approach this a different way: Since they are both pages about minor characters, which should take priority? The species or the character? The plentiful ones or the one that tags with Mario? To make matters even more confusing, there is a playable Luma in ''[[Mario Tennis Open]]'' that isn't the silver one. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 15:04, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Why is Mario's cap/Apricot/etc (silver?) Luma at [[Luma (character)]] anyway? According to the article, it's "Baby Luma" in SMG2 and SSB Wii U. Shouldn't the apricot Luma be moved there?
| |
| :::::As for the MTO yellow "Luma" playable character..., well, the default skin for the "playable" Luma in the "Rosalina & Luma" pair in SSB4 & SSBU is yellow... - [[User:Reboot|Reboot]] ([[User talk:Reboot|talk]]) 15:14, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::According to the manual. The ones in-game are (young-in most) master [[File:SMG Luma.jpg|25px]] Luma. However, Baby Luma is also the most recent (since it is in SSBfWU). And since he is called young in the actual SMG2 game, I can see that moving to Baby Luma. {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 15:58, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::I'm for moving Luma (character) to "Baby Luma" and Luma (species) to here. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 16:08, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::So am I. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 18:50, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::Hm, the characters in SMG and SMG2 always came off as different-yet-similar entities to me. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:22, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Should we list The Super Mario Bros. Movie section on here? ==
| |
| It's because of the fact that [[Lumalee]] has been officially confirmed to be in this movie. I am still wondering if regular Lumas will appear. Keep in mind there are several articles (Goombas, Koopa Troopas, Piranha Plants, etc) that list a different version of characters appearing, so... [[User:MarioBobfan2007'snewaccount|MarioBobfan2007'snewaccount]] ([[User talk:MarioBobfan2007'snewaccount|talk]]) 23:17, March 19, 2023 (EDT)
| |
| :I don't really see any reason not to actually. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 06:25, March 20, 2023 (EDT)
| |