Editing Talk:List of references in music
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Would anybody object if I moved this to "Musical References"? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 00:23, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | ::Would anybody object if I moved this to "Musical References"? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 00:23, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
::: I think people listens to music instead of seeing it (Unless if it was a music video.) (I don't mind.) :P {{User:Princess Grapes Butterfly/sig}} | ::: I think people listens to music instead of seeing it (Unless if it was a music video.) (I don't mind.) :P {{User:Princess Grapes Butterfly/sig}} | ||
:Yeah, but it fits quite well with all the other {{ | :Yeah, but it fits quite well with all the other {{fakelink|Sightings}} pages. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 08:59, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Then maybe it's the sightings that have to change. "Sightings" makes it sound like Mario is Bigfoot or something. ;) Maybe it should all be changed to "References." So, we'd have Video Game References, Music References, etc. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 11:25, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | ::Then maybe it's the sightings that have to change. "Sightings" makes it sound like Mario is Bigfoot or something. ;) Maybe it should all be changed to "References." So, we'd have Video Game References, Music References, etc. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 11:25, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::Good point. Should we make this a proposal? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | :::Good point. Should we make this a proposal? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==Reorganize List of Mario references in music== | ==Reorganize List of Mario references in music== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
Like I mention above, I believe this article should be reorganized (or some may say need to be organized to begin with) to make it easier for visitors to navigate through this article. | Like I mention above, I believe this article should be reorganized (or some may say need to be organized to begin with) to make it easier for visitors to navigate through this article. | ||
The sense of reorganization I propose: It will first be organized by artist/artist group, in alphabetical order | The sense of reorganization I propose: It will first be organized by artist/artist group, in alphabetical order, (sectioned off by "==="), then by the title of the song (no quotations, also in alphabetical order if more than one song by the same artist is there, and sectioned off as a sub-title by "===="). | ||
The current one is pretty cluttered up, and also another fact to point out is that each sub-section accounts for only one song for one artist/artist group. What happens if an artist/artist group make another song with Mario references in it? Will we need to make another sub-section accounting for the same artist/artist group? That's why I suggest this system. | The current one is pretty cluttered up, and also another fact to point out is that each sub-section accounts for only one song for one artist/artist group. What happens if an artist/artist group make another song with Mario references in it? Will we need to make another sub-section accounting for the same artist/artist group? That's why I suggest this system. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 51: | ||
#{{User|Zero777}} Per proposal. It sounds ridiculous to enter in another sub-section with an artist/artist group that's already there. Plus the current organization system of "latest" on the bottom is really disorganized. | #{{User|Zero777}} Per proposal. It sounds ridiculous to enter in another sub-section with an artist/artist group that's already there. Plus the current organization system of "latest" on the bottom is really disorganized. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per proposal. | #{{User|Yoshi876}} Per proposal. | ||
===Leave it as is=== | ===Leave it as is=== | ||
| Line 60: | Line 56: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Most artist headers will only have one song subheader: that's a lot of organizational redundancy and clutter (especially in the TOC). Maybe it'd be better to cut the page in half: one overall section for the artists, which would then have artist headers and song subheaders (and be in alphabetical order by artist), but then the other half could be for single-entry-artists' songs, which would be listed in alphabetical order by title, ''without'' artist headers. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 11:43, 20 December 2013 (EST) | Most artist headers will only have one song subheader: that's a lot of organizational redundancy and clutter (especially in the TOC). Maybe it'd be better to cut the page in half: one overall section for the artists, which would then have artist headers and song subheaders (and be in alphabetical order by artist), but then the other half could be for single-entry-artists' songs, which would be listed in alphabetical order by title, ''without'' artist headers. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 11:43, 20 December 2013 (EST) | ||
When you organize an artist, will it be by last name? <br>{{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 13:46, 20 December 2013 (EST) | When you organize an artist, will it be by last name? <br>{{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 13:46, 20 December 2013 (EST) | ||
