Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 65: |
Line 65: |
|
| |
|
| ==Move Kolorado's father to Richard or Korvallis== | | ==Move Kolorado's father to Richard or Korvallis== |
| {{settled TPP}} | | {{TPP}} |
| {{proposal outcome|passed|7-16-4|Move to Korvallis}} | | {{early notice|December 10}} |
| Time for take 2. See the above discussions and proposal. | | Time for take 2. See the above discussions and proposal. |
|
| |
|
Line 139: |
Line 139: |
| ::Simply because we try to avoid conjectural names when we can here. And as these are the likely intended names of the character, that's info we should make clear, imo, given we're a wiki and all. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 15:56, December 8, 2024 (EST) | | ::Simply because we try to avoid conjectural names when we can here. And as these are the likely intended names of the character, that's info we should make clear, imo, given we're a wiki and all. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 15:56, December 8, 2024 (EST) |
| ::I feel like Richard being the intended Japanese name, or at the very least an internal name for the character, isn't really debatable here. The question is whether Korvallis is meant to be the English version of that name. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 18:53, December 8, 2024 (EST) | | ::I feel like Richard being the intended Japanese name, or at the very least an internal name for the character, isn't really debatable here. The question is whether Korvallis is meant to be the English version of that name. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 18:53, December 8, 2024 (EST) |
|
| |
| == Jumped the gun? ==
| |
|
| |
| So, I'm coming back to this page after the proposal was passed and the page was moved. I will fully admit, I had misunderstood the reasoning for the name change to Korvallis when I read it earlier. Reading it now, written out on the article's page, gave me a serious double-take. I think we're making a few too many unfounded assumptions here. Is the father's name Richard due to the internal data? Probably, sure. Did the English localizers of the Switch remake see the name "Richard" on the Boo's quiz, recognize that it matches the name of the internal data from the original release for a character who is not named in-game, and make the conscious decision that it represents said character and came up with a newly localized name intending it to be the official name of the character? THAT I find very hard to believe. Myself, I think they just saw "Richard" and saw it as nothing more than the name "Richard". They wanted the English version of the quiz to have everyone's name be a Koopa-related name, and so came up with one to match Kooper, Koops and Kolorado. The attribution of the name Korvallis to the character is made on not just one, but two assumptions, and I think that's a bit much. The quiz has some other completely made up answers like "Pork chops", the Poshley heights hotel names, "Poshley" (for Bub's mom), "Movie Star", and the names for the Puni shopkeeper. The fact that Korvallis happens to sit in a particular answer slot doesn't prove to me that it's meant to be this character's name. (Side note, it might also help if we had the full list of all four answers to the quiz from the Japanese version) [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 20:38, December 26, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :I definitely understand where you're coming from, given the first version of the proposal didn't even include Korvallis as an option due to me assuming it would be too speculative. And while I get that there are fake names in the quizzes too, it feels like a different situation given Richard seemingly being referenced again 20 years later. I'd definitely be down for adding the Japanese versions of the quizzes, given I do have a remake textdump. If you want to start work on it yourself, I can link you to it. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 20:52, December 26, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::For the question involving the Dull Bones at least, it does match the same order of Kolorado's dad, Kolorado, Kooper, and Koops. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 20:55, December 26, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :That’s exactly why I asked to see the other translations first: I wanted to see if the other translators were indeed using names based on Kolorado or just made-up names in that first slot, as Richard and Charles are only a clear connection if you know that the first is meant to be the father of the second. As an example, the fact that the Italian version used Charles and Karles for Kolorado and the first slot, respectively, was an indication that the Italian localizers indeed wanted a name that was clearly based on Kolorado’s name in that language. It supports the notion that the general intention of the localizers was indeed that of coming up with a name related to Kolorado’s name for the first slot, with internal data revealing that in the Japanese version the first slot indeed features the name of Kolorado’s father. Of course, there are some steps to take - which is why Korvallis was my second vote, as Richard on the other hand was a choice fully compliant with the wiki’s naming policy -, but in the grand scheme of things I can say that the page title isn’t just speculative.—[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 04:39, December 27, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Just the fact that we have to include a paragraph with 170 words to explain where the name comes from makes me think we're seeing connections where there aren't any. The wiki is meant to report facts, and I don't think we can call this a fact. Is the name Korvallis due to the matching positioning in the answer set? Maybe? Probably, even. But there's no way to actually confirm that without speaking to the localization team. Conversely, the internal data is directly connected to the set of bones, which is more factual. [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 16:59, December 28, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::I don't understand how fully explaining the situation means there aren't any connections. So it's 170 words long. That's not much different from how we have paragraphs explaining names on other pages even when said names are officially confirmed. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 17:54, December 28, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :::Because it shouldn't take 170 words to explain where a name comes from. [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 18:09, December 29, 2024 (EST)
| |