Editing Talk:Koopa Troopa
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{award-winner | |||
|year=second | |||
|#=14 | |||
|award=Favorite Enemy | |||
|presenter=YellowYoshi398 | |||
}} | |||
Why are these MK-related items (Red Homing Shell, Green Shell, Blue Shell) under a section of Koopa Troopa? Those are items that should have their own pages. <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 15:25, 31 August 2006 (EDT) | Why are these MK-related items (Red Homing Shell, Green Shell, Blue Shell) under a section of Koopa Troopa? Those are items that should have their own pages. <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 15:25, 31 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
:Long ago, in the early days of this Wiki, some users decided that it would be better to place info of items related to species in the articles. Those days should end now. I think we should seperate the items from the species page. They are related, but both are distinct enough to have their own pages. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | :Long ago, in the early days of this Wiki, some users decided that it would be better to place info of items related to species in the articles. Those days should end now. I think we should seperate the items from the species page. They are related, but both are distinct enough to have their own pages. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ||
Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
==Koopa redirect== | ==Koopa redirect== | ||
I've noticed that a lot of members of the koopa troop, Magikoopas, Hammer Bros, Spiny, and even Bowser are referred to as Koopas which in this wiki redirects to Koopa Troopa. Now Bowser and Spiny are definitely not Koopa Troopas. Should we have a separate article about all "koopa" species, or is that unnecessary since [[ | I've noticed that a lot of members of the koopa troop, Magikoopas, Hammer Bros, Spiny, and even Bowser are referred to as Koopas which in this wiki redirects to Koopa Troopa. Now Bowser and Spiny are definitely not Koopa Troopas. Should we have a separate article about all "koopa" species, or is that unnecessary since [[Koopa Troop]] and [[Koopa Troopa]] both provide a lot of information? Either that, or could [[Koopa]] redirect to Koopa Troop instead? Sorry if I am being nitpicky :( | ||
{{User:Goomb-omb/sig}} | {{User:Goomb-omb/sig}} | ||
:Personally, I'd like to see "Koopa" be an article in its own right too. A while ago, I actually separated {{tem|Koopas}} and {{tem|Koopa Troopas}} for this very idea - as you said, Bowser is not a Koopa Troopa. But the problem is that Nintendo is absolutely horrendous at providing specific terms for us to cling to (i.e. Bowser has no official species name, so we have nowhere to put him), so we're stuck using the quintessential Koopa Troopa as a proxy for a page dedicated to "Koopas" as a whole. Putting the general information on the Koopa Troop page wouldn't do because it's a military organization, and thus, does not represent all Koopas; it also includes non-Koopas, and many species some would consider Koopas while others wouldn't (i.e. [[Clubba]]s). Also, creating a stand-alone "Koopa" page runs the risk of turning out like the horrendous {{fake link|Alien}} page: it smashes together snippets of information from various sources and tries to make it seem like one big unit, but fails miserably. Similarly a "Koopa" page would be expected to have notes on Koopa culture and Koopa history, which, given what we have to work on, will turn out as fragmented as the Alien page. The only thing we could do is lists of notable Koopas and of the species, though like I said before, stating what is and isn't a Koopa may not be as black an white as one would hope. Lists are disappointing to most readers, but anything more would be more original research than hard facts, which is frowned upon here; we'll have to cite everything to make it credible, and that's something most users don't seem to be up for. It'd be a huge undertaking, but if it's done right, I think it'd be worth it. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 01:37, 29 June 2009 (EDT) | :Personally, I'd like to see "Koopa" be an article in its own right too. A while ago, I actually separated {{tem|Koopas}} and {{tem|Koopa Troopas}} for this very idea - as you said, Bowser is not a Koopa Troopa. But the problem is that Nintendo is absolutely horrendous at providing specific terms for us to cling to (i.e. Bowser has no official species name, so we have nowhere to put him), so we're stuck using the quintessential Koopa Troopa as a proxy for a page dedicated to "Koopas" as a whole. Putting the general information on the Koopa Troop page wouldn't do because it's a military organization, and thus, does not represent all Koopas; it also includes non-Koopas, and many species some would consider Koopas while others wouldn't (i.e. [[Clubba]]s). Also, creating a stand-alone "Koopa" page runs the risk of turning out like the horrendous {{fake link|Alien}} page: it smashes together snippets of information from various sources and tries to make it seem like one big unit, but fails miserably. Similarly a "Koopa" page would be expected to have notes on Koopa culture and Koopa history, which, given what we have to work on, will turn out as fragmented as the Alien page. The only thing we could do is lists of notable Koopas and of the species, though like I said before, stating what is and isn't a Koopa may not be as black an white as one would hope. Lists are disappointing to most readers, but anything more would be more original research than hard facts, which is frowned upon here; we'll have to cite everything to make it credible, and that's something most users don't seem to be up for. It'd be a huge undertaking, but if it's done right, I think it'd be worth it. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 01:37, 29 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
Line 132: | Line 138: | ||
==Split Red Koopa Troopa and Green Koopa Troopa== | ==Split Red Koopa Troopa and Green Koopa Troopa== | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ | {{ProposalOutcome|red|don't split 2-0-11}} | ||
Red and Green Koopa Troopa have been distinctly different throughout the entire history of the ''Mario'' series, the shell governing if they would turn around or not. They even have different stats in the sports games (e.g. Mario Super Sluggers). This alone is already a big difference, and isn't a matter of Toad color. It would stay consistent with having a [[Gold Goomba]], [[Goombrat]], etc. where the differences were enough to have its own article. Also, the ongoing Pokey proposal [[Talk:Pokey#Split Green Pokey enemy from the Yellow one|here]] would lead me to believe this is a good idea. | Red and Green Koopa Troopa have been distinctly different throughout the entire history of the ''Mario'' series, the shell governing if they would turn around or not. They even have different stats in the sports games (e.g. Mario Super Sluggers). This alone is already a big difference, and isn't a matter of Toad color. It would stay consistent with having a [[Gold Goomba]], [[Goombrat]], etc. where the differences were enough to have its own article. Also, the ongoing Pokey proposal [[Talk:Pokey#Split Green Pokey enemy from the Yellow one|here]] would lead me to believe this is a good idea. | ||
Line 200: | Line 206: | ||
==Electro-Koopa== | ==Electro-Koopa== | ||
I also think that Electro-Koopas should be delisted as derived species of Koopa Troopas. They're just too different to be considered subspecies. They should be listed under [[Koopa (species)]] derived species instead. Design-wise, electro-koopas are more different from Koopa Troopas than [[Boom Boom]]s are from [[Bowser]] and [[Chargin' Chuck]]. - [[User:Electric-Gecko|Electric-Gecko]] ([[User talk:Electric-Gecko|talk]]) 18:16, 31 August 2018 (EDT) | I also think that Electro-Koopas should be delisted as derived species of Koopa Troopas. They're just too different to be considered subspecies. They should be listed under [[Koopa (species)]] derived species instead. Design-wise, electro-koopas are more different from Koopa Troopas than [[Boom Boom]]s are from [[Bowser]] and [[Chargin' Chuck]]. - [[User:Electric-Gecko|Electric-Gecko]] ([[User talk:Electric-Gecko|talk]]) 18:16, 31 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
:Well, you have [[Koopeleon]], [[Bombshell Koopa]], and [[Snooza Koopa]] categorized under Koopa Troopa. I think the Electro-Koopas look more similar to Koopa Troopas than the other creatures that have "Koopa" in their name (Spike Koopa). I think the similarity is close enough to be considered a derived species of Koopa Troopa. Finally, [https://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/ | :Well, you have [[Koopeleon]], [[Bombshell Koopa]], and [[Snooza Koopa]] categorized under Koopa Troopa. I think the Electro-Koopas look more similar to Koopa Troopas than the other creatures that have "Koopa" in their name (Spike Koopa). I think the similarity is close enough to be considered a derived species of Koopa Troopa. Finally, [https://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_42#Stop_using_the_term_.22sub-species.22_on_the_wiki we've retired the use of "sub-species" in the wiki], so I recommend against using it. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 18:23, 31 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
:They have Nokonoko in their Japanese name. They are a variant of Nokonoko. Nokonoko is Koopa Troopa. Ergo, they are a derivative of Troopa specifically. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:23, 31 August 2018 (EDT) | :They have Nokonoko in their Japanese name. They are a variant of Nokonoko. Nokonoko is Koopa Troopa. Ergo, they are a derivative of Troopa specifically. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:23, 31 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
Line 214: | Line 220: | ||
== SMW Koopa Troopa speed == | == SMW Koopa Troopa speed == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
Since 2009, this page has asserted that blue and yellow koopas in ''Super Mario World'' are faster than red and green koopas respectively. However, ''[[Mario Mania]]'' page 102 declares the opposite. It claims they are slower than the reds and greens. These competing claims must be resolved. The [[Beach Koopa]] page also has a similar claim that must be checked. If found erroneous, the main SMW page will also have to be edited.--[[User:Platform|Platform]] ([[User talk:Platform|talk]]) 11:24, July 22, 2022 (EDT) | Since 2009, this page has asserted that blue and yellow koopas in ''Super Mario World'' are faster than red and green koopas respectively. However, ''[[Mario Mania]]'' page 102 declares the opposite. It claims they are slower than the reds and greens. These competing claims must be resolved. The [[Beach Koopa]] page also has a similar claim that must be checked. If found erroneous, the main SMW page will also have to be edited.--[[User:Platform|Platform]] ([[User talk:Platform|talk]]) 11:24, July 22, 2022 (EDT) | ||
:Is there a level in the game where we can see these multiple colored Koopas at the same time? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 17:39, July 22, 2022 (EDT) | :Is there a level in the game where we can see these multiple colored Koopas at the same time? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 17:39, July 22, 2022 (EDT) | ||
::One of the (secret?) levels in Donut Plains does IIRC. I also recall blue and yellow indeed being faster. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:23, July 22, 2022 (EDT) | ::One of the (secret?) levels in Donut Plains does IIRC. I also recall blue and yellow indeed being faster. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:23, July 22, 2022 (EDT) | ||
:::Can you verify with a video of any sort if anyone got some time to spare? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 23:43, July 25, 2022 (EDT) | :::Can you verify with a video of any sort if anyone got some time to spare? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 23:43, July 25, 2022 (EDT) | ||
== Water creatures == | == Water creatures == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
I know these categories have been going under enemies who have been using these elements in some way, but in this case, this is going too far. Currently, Koopa Troopas have been grouped under "water creatures" for water forming around them in a tennis game, and looking at the Puzzle and Dragons section only the green Koopa Troopas use water element and red Koopa Troopas use fire element, and we are not using a fire creatures category for this article. Bowser uses poison-based attacks in RPG games which to my view holds a lot more credibility than tennis games. It will also be confusing for readers who see that Koopa Troopas are grouped under "water creatures" only because of an obscure tennis move. Therefore, I still strongly think the category should have no place here. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 13:22, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | I know these categories have been going under enemies who have been using these elements in some way, but in this case, this is going too far. Currently, Koopa Troopas have been grouped under "water creatures" for water forming around them in a tennis game, and looking at the Puzzle and Dragons section only the green Koopa Troopas use water element and red Koopa Troopas use fire element, and we are not using a fire creatures category for this article. Bowser uses poison-based attacks in RPG games which to my view holds a lot more credibility than tennis games. It will also be confusing for readers who see that Koopa Troopas are grouped under "water creatures" only because of an obscure tennis move. Therefore, I still strongly think the category should have no place here. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 13:22, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:Bowser to me is just not viewed as a character of poison element, not from general perception of him to his character bios nowhere near his association with fire. Even in Bowser's case, those attacks are still relatively cryptic. The categories in [[:Category:Elemental creatures]], including the whole [[:Category:Fire creatures]] (such as me raising an eyebrow at Magikoopa being classified as a fire creature and not Mario divorced from his Fire form) and these other kind of elemental categories do need to be looked into more. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:04, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | :Bowser to me is just not viewed as a character of poison element, not from general perception of him to his character bios nowhere near his association with fire. Even in Bowser's case, those attacks are still relatively cryptic. The categories in [[:Category:Elemental creatures]], including the whole [[:Category:Fire creatures]] (such as me raising an eyebrow at Magikoopa being classified as a fire creature and not Mario divorced from his Fire form) and these other kind of elemental categories do need to be looked into more. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:04, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | ||
Line 227: | Line 235: | ||
:::I can agree to such a proposal. It'd deal with those irksome instances of subjects being in the elemental creatures categories because of one-off appearances--e.g. [[Boo]]s and [[Mini Goomba]]s in [[:Category:Electrical creatures]] and [[:Category:Poisonous creatures]] respectively because of ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]]''. [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 17:18, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | :::I can agree to such a proposal. It'd deal with those irksome instances of subjects being in the elemental creatures categories because of one-off appearances--e.g. [[Boo]]s and [[Mini Goomba]]s in [[:Category:Electrical creatures]] and [[:Category:Poisonous creatures]] respectively because of ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]]''. [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 17:18, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | ||
::::I wanna point out that until a proposal from a few years back, habitat also qualified for it (ie, penguins were considered "ice creatures" by default). I think the current system is fine, but may need a bit more scrutiny. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:39, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | ::::I wanna point out that until a proposal from a few years back, habitat also qualified for it (ie, penguins were considered "ice creatures" by default). I think the current system is fine, but may need a bit more scrutiny. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:39, September 9, 2023 (EDT) | ||