Editing Talk:KP Koopa

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
==MERGE==
==MERGE==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|red|do not merge 1-13}}
A bit like Mr Bones' Spookum one. I believe this page should be merged with either [[Koopa Troopa]] or [[KP Koopas]]-since only 2 appear in the game and they are characters, it's likely that they are the only 2. They are not a different species, they have just dyed their shells and are not important enough for their own page. According to [[KP Pete]]'s tattle, "That's a KP Koopa. It's a Koopa Troopa of a slightly different color. Looks like its abilities are just like any Koopa...".<br>  
A bit like Mr Bones' Spookum one. I believe this page should be merged with [[KP Koopas]]-since only 2 appear in the game and they are characters, it's likely that they are the only 2. They are not a different species, they have just dyed their shells and are not important enough for their own page. According to [[KP Pete]]'s tattle, "That's a KP Koopa. It's a Koopa Troopa of a slightly different color. Looks like its abilities are just like any Koopa...".<br>  
@Anyone who opposes: The three KP Koopas in PMTTYD are from the Glitz Pit. They are the only ones. Colour or location does not matter. Are you saying we should make separate articles for Red Koopa Troopas from Petalburg? Or Blue Goombas from W1-2 of SMB? NO! The tattle confirms it (and it is just a tattle for a character (KP Pete)): "It's a Koopa Troopa of a slightly different colour." Not a good reason to be split. It just wears a Shell DYED Gold. KP Pete and his friends were regular Koopa Troopas once, as with (If any others exist) all KP Koopas.
@Anyone who opposes: The three KP Koopas in PMTTYD are from the Glitz Pit. They are the only ones. Colour or location does not matter. Are you saying we should make separate articles for Red Koopa Troopas from Petalburg? Or Blue Goombas from W1-2 of SMB? NO! The tattle confirms it (and it is just a tattle for a character (KP Pete)): "It's a Koopa Troopa of a slightly different colour." Not a good reason to be split. It just wears a Shell DYED Gold. And after one page of searching I have found this to be true. From the log about KP Paratroopa: "A Koopa Troopa who's dyed its shell." '''Therefore, it confirms that they just dyed their shells''', and KP Pete and his friends were regular Koopa Troopas once, as with (If any others exist) all KP Koopas.


'''Proposer:''' {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} <br>
'''Proposer:''' {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} <br>
Line 11: Line 10:
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} Per Proposal
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} Per Proposal


===Don't Merge!===
===Oppose===
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} KP Koopas have different tattle information than Koopa Troopas, are different colors than Koopas, and appear in different locations than them. Plus, they are listed as separate characters. Basically, they are a similar sub-species of Koopa Troopas.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} KP Koopas have different tattle information than Koopa Troopas, are different colors than Koopas, and appear in different locations than them. Plus, they are listed as separate characters. Basically, they are a similar sub-species of Koopa Troopas.
#{{User|Reversinator}} Let me ask you something: do you have any proof that they´re just recolored Koopas? No
#{{User|Reversinator}} Let me ask you something: do you have any proof that they´re just recolored Koopas? No.
#{{User|Fuzzipede27}} Per Fawfulfury65.
#{{User|Fuzzipede27}} Per Fawfulfury65.
#{{User|GalacticPetey}} Per Fawfulfurt65.
#{{User|GalacticPetey}} Per Fawfulfurt65.
#{{User|Mr bones}} My proposal have both of these conditions: Same name and similarity. Yours has only the second one. Sorry, but per all.
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - Per FF65.
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - Per Edo
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - Per Edo
#{{User|Supermariofan14}} - Per the Fury
#{{User|Supermariofan14}} - Per the Fury.
#{{User|Superboo922}}- Per FP27.
#{{User|Superboo922}}- Per FP27.
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per FF65. All the talk of "species vs. sub-species vs. colour morph" is inconsistent, unscientific and speculative; it's best to simply let Nintendo decide which enemies are unique with its name games.
#{{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! Per all. Zero signing out.
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - Per Walkazo.
#{{User|Mr bones}} Wait a minute! KP Koopas is a fighting team made of KP Koopas and a KP Paratroopa. I'm sorry, but I have to re-oppose. Per Walkazo.
#{{User|Frostyfireyoshi}} I'm going to have to oppose now. See Walkazo's comments below.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} [[KP Pete]] has to go somewhere too. Per all.


===Discuss. You have two weeks starting frooooomm---NOW!===
===Discuss. You have two weeks starting frooooomm---NOW!===
Line 71: Line 66:


Never Mind! I agree with you Mr bones! {{User:GalacticPetey/sig}}
Never Mind! I agree with you Mr bones! {{User:GalacticPetey/sig}}
"''Why would someone like Walkazo put it there if it was false.''" - I actually can't remember exactly where I got the "dyed" info (I rewrote the page a looong time ago), but I think it was from elsewhere on the wiki. As for the "sub-species" stuff... that's all very up in the air around the wiki: a lot of things are called species or sub-species that wouldn't even be considered different races in real life, and in lieu of any official regulations, I tend to take everything to do with ''Mario'' "biology" with a grain of salt nowadays. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 18:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
:WHOA! IMPORTANT INFO HERE! From the log about KP Paratroopas it says: "A Koopa Troopa who's dyed its shell." That is ovbiously all the proof I need! {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 17:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
::So now I have proved most of you wrong... {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 09:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
So? What if they dyed their shells gold? Still, they're meant to be different from Koopa Troopas. Like their name says. And don't say the name isn't important, because it is. If the original creator wanted them to be different. Then, they are different. We see alot of named Koopa Troopas, like Koopa Koot, and the Koopas Bros.{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
:Yes, but what proof do you have that there are more in the world. If there was, then they would have appeared in PMTTYD, after all, Mario did travel everywhere and still didn't see any of them. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 10:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I didn't say there are more of those KP things in the world...{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
:Exactly, and that must mean that the characters KP Koopas are the only 3 KP Koopas in the world. If their shell is dyed gold, they can't qualify as a different species. Like spraying a raccoon gold and calling it a KP Raccoon. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 10:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I read the article. There is nothing that refers to them as a specie.{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
:Yes, '''the refers to them as a species. That is the only purpose of this article and it's doing it wrong. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 10:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
article itself'''
No it doesn't! Can you pick me a word that proves that the article refers to those koopas as species?{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
:First of all the Koopa Troopa article refers to them as a sub-species, which is untrue as their shells are only dyed gold, secondly, if the KP Koopas article is for the fighting team then what is this for? {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 10:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Then the koopa troopa article should be fixed, not this! I don't get the second line of your comment.{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
:I meant if you don't think this article is about the species, then why is it here? There is already an article about the fighting team and that has all the stats on it. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 11:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
How about merging this article into [[KP Koopas|this one]], instead of the Koopa Troopa article? {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 12:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
:I'm happy to merge into either. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 12:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes merge into [[KP Koopas]]. {{User:Booderdash/sig}}
:Yes, I said originally to merge into either Koopa Troopa or KP Koopas and to be honest now I see that is the best option. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 12:21, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Well, after I saw the glitz pit article. Merging it to the KP Koopas is better! I'm okay with that!{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
Cool. I just pointed it out as we're unsure of whether they are a species or just a fighting team. This way, we can, as the phrase goes, 'play it safe'. {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 13:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
EDIT: Aren't all the oppose votes currently redundant, as it has been decided to merge with KP Koopas, not Koopa?
:No, they're not redundant: the argument is that KP Koopas (the "species") are separate from Koopa Troopas and therefore deserve their own article (separate from the Koopa Troopas ''and'' from the Glitz Pit team) is still valid. Of course, "species" is the wrong thing to call them: they're not even a "sub-species"; the better thing to do would be to call them a "type" of Koopa Troopa, or simply saying they ''are'' Koopa Troopas, like the current version of the article (the category notwithstanding), since anything else is speculative and largely unscientific. However, the "species" problem runs through the entire wiki: dealing with it is an endeavour unto itself, and certainly not something to be decided in a TPP. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 18:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
::Well, at least Reversinator's vote is redundant. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 08:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
I can't really agree with merging this with KP Koopas either. I mean, there's a difference between a team and a species. The team is pretty minor, though, and it's just a group of KP Koopas that fight. If you ask me, the KP Koopas team article should be merged into the KP Koopa article. {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}}
:We could do that, and merge KP Paratroopa too. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 20:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
i agree that KP Koopas aren't a specie, and not a sub-specie. But like Walkazo said, It's a type of koopa troopas that deserves its own article! And KP Koopas is a team made of two KP Koopas and a KP Paratroopa. It's like a football team, made of players!{{User:Mr bones/sig}}
Okay. I understand some of this but what is being merged? Is it now KP Koopas (the team) & KP Paratroopa into KP Koopa? {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 08:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
:If that will make more people support, then yes. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 08:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Aha. What about the gold-shelled Koopa Troopa in SMG? Is that a KP Koopa? And are those gold Koopa Shells from KP Koopas? {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 08:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
:We can't say for sure either way: their existence is worth noting in this page's Trivia section, at the very least. As for the proposed merger of the KP Koopas article, there's two major problems with that. One, you can't change this proposal at this point - you'd have to make a completely different TPP after this one passes the deadline. Two, if the KP Koopas article is deemed undeserving of its own page, [[Template:Glitz Pit teams|every other Glitz Pit team]]'s article must be merged as well, to be consistent, and not only is this too many merges to propose via TPP, it will certainly never pass. Sorry, but the status quo is the only way to go on this one. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 23:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
::Ah. I see now. Thanks for clearing that up a bit, Walkazo! {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 14:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
==Merge?==
So, I'm aware about the above proposal, but with my recent [[Red Spike Top]] proposal passing and everyone opposing pointing out how this is an almost identical situation...''should'' we merge these with the normal Koopa Troopas, since this ''is'' pretty much the same situation? [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 20:22, January 29, 2022 (EST)
: Yeah, I agree. If the logs in game say it's ''exactly the same'' as a regular Koopa Troopa and only differs via shell color then these two articles should absolutely be merged. [[User:PrincessPeachFan|PrincessPeachFan]] ([[User talk:PrincessPeachFan|talk]]) 08:56, February 4, 2022 (EST)
::They're not actually a color variant, so no. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 20:56, May 26, 2022 (EDT)
:::"That's a KP Koopa. It's a Koopa Troopa of a slightly different color." When you say it's not a color variant, you mean how it's name isn't something like "Yellow Koopa"? [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 17:40, May 27, 2022 (EDT)
::::I think that's what they mean. Anyways, I'm still kind of unsure about this, but then again we do have all the LMDM aesthetic ghosts merged with each other. [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 17:43, May 27, 2022 (EDT)
:::::Didn't you also say that they have different internal stats and are therefore "not comparable to Red Spike Tops"?
:::::Though even without that, I'd likely oppose. I feel that we already have an inconsistent way of dealing with palette swapped topics, I feel the RPG enemies are fine the way they are. Considering we naturally keep articles for stronger variants of enemies such as Dark Koopas or Bombshell Bills (which at the base of things are just purple Koopas and yellow Bullet Bills respectively) to even Goomba Rs (which are not even palette swaps, instead just stronger Goombas), I feel it's fine to keep these split, despite the slight differences. And this is just me, whether I'm wrong on the interpretation or not, when I think of merging two topics together, I feel it's meant to treat them as '''the same topic''' unless obviously stated otherwise. KP Koopas have a slight difference so I believe it's fair for them to have their own article, like any other RPG enemy variant, despite the difference being almost unnoticeable in normal gameplay. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
::::::Tails, The reason I'm bringing this up is because everyone ''doubted'' that statement during the proposal and now I'm doubting it too. [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 21:48, May 27, 2022 (EDT)
:::::::That's fair, that's fair. And I can see the reasoning, though I still disagree and stand by my thoughts. That's all. {{User:Tails777/sig}}

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)