Editing Talk:Island
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:::Imagine for a moment if an official guide for SMB1 named these blocks here: [[File:SMM2 Ground SMB icon.png|32px]] something like "Shattered Stones". It'd make sense make an article about them, but then if someone comes along and sees these: [[File:SMM2 Ground SMW icon.png|32px]] and says "well, they clearly serve very much of the same purpose as Shattered Stones, They're basically the same thing with an artstyle change", that would just sound silly to me. That's not shattered stone! I don't think its appropriate to expand "Island" to refer to "Athletic platforms" in general, for one because that concept is quite broad, and for two most signs point to the name "island" being a mere descriptor for the way the SMB1 platforms look like tiny islands. --[[User:PopitTart|PopitTart]] ([[User talk:PopitTart|talk]]) 05:07, February 20, 2025 (EST) | :::Imagine for a moment if an official guide for SMB1 named these blocks here: [[File:SMM2 Ground SMB icon.png|32px]] something like "Shattered Stones". It'd make sense make an article about them, but then if someone comes along and sees these: [[File:SMM2 Ground SMW icon.png|32px]] and says "well, they clearly serve very much of the same purpose as Shattered Stones, They're basically the same thing with an artstyle change", that would just sound silly to me. That's not shattered stone! I don't think its appropriate to expand "Island" to refer to "Athletic platforms" in general, for one because that concept is quite broad, and for two most signs point to the name "island" being a mere descriptor for the way the SMB1 platforms look like tiny islands. --[[User:PopitTart|PopitTart]] ([[User talk:PopitTart|talk]]) 05:07, February 20, 2025 (EST) | ||
::::I understand what you mean, though I do not think your example is particularly great because [[File:SMM2 Ground SMB icon.png|32px]] and [[File:SMM2 Ground SMW icon.png|32px]] ''are'' the same thing, and if we were in a scenario like the one you describe, I would probably make the effort to track down a more serviceable name, but I would still prioritize having them share the same article because they are the same thing. The name we have is not "the thing itself." | ::::I understand what you mean, though I do not think your example is particularly great because [[File:SMM2 Ground SMB icon.png|32px]] and [[File:SMM2 Ground SMW icon.png|32px]] ''are'' the same thing, and if we were in a scenario like the one you describe, I would probably make the effort to track down a more serviceable name, but I would still prioritize having them share the same article because they are the same thing. The name we have is not "the thing itself." | ||
::::I am not even inclined to do that in this case because : 1.) the aesthetic of ''Super Mario Bros. 3'' objects is "stage prop," and I know from my experience as a stagehand that it is not uncommon for objects in the | ::::I am not even inclined to do that in this case because : 1.) the aesthetic of ''Super Mario Bros. 3'' objects is "stage prop," and I know from my experience as a stagehand that it is not uncommon for objects in the landscape to be made out of wood; 2.) there are wooden objects called [https://i.pinimg.com/originals/de/0d/1a/de0d1a14206fcf96883cc4b2551c554e.jpg islands]; and 3.) I honestly never thought the original platform from ''Super Mario Bros.'' looked like islands to begin with. When I played the game, I assumed they were trees, and the fact that there is an official name for the object has only emphasized how unusual they look. | ||
::::I think we generally lump object subjects more often than we should, and in a way we would never do for characters or enemies. But, in this case, I really think these are the same thing and it would be a more accurate reflection of their history for them to be in the same article. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 07:47, February 20, 2025 (EST) | ::::I think we generally lump object subjects more often than we should, and in a way we would never do for characters or enemies. But, in this case, I really think these are the same thing and it would be a more accurate reflection of their history for them to be in the same article. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 07:47, February 20, 2025 (EST) |