Editing Talk:Homing Chomp
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Move back to Silver Chomp == | == Move back to Silver Chomp == | ||
{{ | |||
{{TPP}} | |||
The current name of this article comes solely from Mario Portal, which was from about a year ago, whereas the name "Silver Chomp" was used in-game (albeit for a mission title) which is even its onky appearance. I want to point out that a recent proposal to move Pianta Thrower back to [[Chuckster]] passed with overwhelming support for a similar reason to this one, a name that has been used in a game still taking priority over a newer name that hasn't. | The current name of this article comes solely from Mario Portal, which was from about a year ago, whereas the name "Silver Chomp" was used in-game (albeit for a mission title) which is even its onky appearance. I want to point out that a recent proposal to move Pianta Thrower back to [[Chuckster]] passed with overwhelming support for a similar reason to this one, a name that has been used in a game still taking priority over a newer name that hasn't. | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
#{{User|MegaBowser64}} Per proposal. | #{{User|MegaBowser64}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} I'd say this is more comparable to [[Giant Wiggler]]. Per proposal, and all. | #{{User|FanOfYoshi}} I'd say this is more comparable to [[Giant Wiggler]]. Per proposal, and all. | ||
<s>{{User|Pseudo}} This is more clear-cut than Stompin' Chomp to me since there are other types of Chomp in that level as well that the title could easily refer to and that title leaves out the "rompin'" element. On top of that, I don't think there is strong reason to believe that Silver Chomp is meant to be a generic descriptor as Doc von Schmeltwick describes — it is a very direct descriptor compared to something like Stompin' Chomp that seems more colloquial I guess | #{{User|Mushroom Head}} Games over whatever mario portal is. Per all. | ||
<s>{{User|Pseudo}} This is more clear-cut than Stompin' Chomp to me since there are other types of Chomp in that level as well that the title could easily refer to and that title leaves out the "rompin'" element. On top of that, I don't think there is strong reason to believe that Silver Chomp is meant to be a generic descriptor as Doc von Schmeltwick describes — it is a very direct descriptor compared to something like Stompin' Chomp that seems more colloquial I guess.</s> | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} Everyone's touched on most talking points by now, but to me, this proposal comes down to "the name from the time" and "the name that was intended". I know that we generally go with the former, but there's reasons to suspect that the name at the time was not the name that was intended, which puts this in a very peculiar spot. Among those reasons, there's also [[Homing Chomp#Internal names|internal]] [[Gold Chomp#Internal names|names]]. If it matched Gold Chomp's in its mention of color, I'd say that Silver Chomp was intended. Instead, it aligns with the Search/Homing name, treating the color as incidental. So, I conclude that this is a misrepresentation. | #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} Everyone's touched on most talking points by now, but to me, this proposal comes down to "the name from the time" and "the name that was intended". I know that we generally go with the former, but there's reasons to suspect that the name at the time was not the name that was intended, which puts this in a very peculiar spot. Among those reasons, there's also [[Homing Chomp#Internal names|internal]] [[Gold Chomp#Internal names|names]]. If it matched Gold Chomp's in its mention of color, I'd say that Silver Chomp was intended. Instead, it aligns with the Search/Homing name, treating the color as incidental. So, I conclude that this is a misrepresentation. | ||
#{{User|Pseudo}} After reading LinkTheLefty's argument and re-reading Camwoodstock's argument, I'm inclined to think that this was a misrepresentation, despite all appearances. | #{{User|Pseudo}} After reading LinkTheLefty's argument and re-reading Camwoodstock's argument, I'm inclined to think that this was a misrepresentation, despite all appearances. | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 49: | Line 47: | ||
::::Additionally, Mario Portal was written by Nintendo of America themselves, while PRIMA stayed third-party. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 11:05, October 12, 2023 (EDT) | ::::Additionally, Mario Portal was written by Nintendo of America themselves, while PRIMA stayed third-party. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 11:05, October 12, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:::::Even NoA doesn't always get their facts right, and it seems like with this specific instance the name Silver Chomp was actually intended as a name. Disregarding precedent, there is no reason to believe that Silver Chomp was meant as a descriptor. --[[User:MegaBowser64|BOWSER...]] ([[User talk:MegaBowser64|talk]]) 20:46, October 13, 2023 (EDT) | :::::Even NoA doesn't always get their facts right, and it seems like with this specific instance the name Silver Chomp was actually intended as a name. Disregarding precedent, there is no reason to believe that Silver Chomp was meant as a descriptor. --[[User:MegaBowser64|BOWSER...]] ([[User talk:MegaBowser64|talk]]) 20:46, October 13, 2023 (EDT) | ||