Editing Talk:Heart Panel

==Merge [[Heart Panel (Super Princess Peach)]] with [[Vibe]]==
{{SettledTPP}}
{{ProposalOutcome|red|oppose 7-11}}
Well, first off, the page has only 2 lines of text on it. The information here could be put in the [[Vibe]] page, and it wouldn't be off-topic.

'''Proposer:''' {{User|Not Bugsy}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' January 23rd, 2011, 23:59 GMT

===Support===
#{{User|Not Bugsy}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Koopayoshi}} We don't need stubs, duh.
#{{User|SWFlash}} Per notbugsy and koopayoshi.
#{{User|Liamroche}} They share the same image.
#{{User|Koopalmier}} Heart Panels are, like, the extension of [[Vibe]]. And the article is very short and, while it can be expanded, it'll end up not being long either. We should make ''Heart Panel'' a sub-section of ''Vibe'' or something, IMO.
#{{User|Ultramariologan}} Per proposal.
#{{User|UltimatePetey}} Although I see Edo's point about the policy, the Heart Panels article is a stub, and if merged with the Vibe article, will reduce a stub and make an article more reasonable to include what the Heart Panels contribute to.

===Oppose===
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Different subjects
#{{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! Per Tucayo and I think it will be better if we purposely expand it, making the explanations longer. Zero signing out.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Per all.
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - To speak frankly, I would love to see these merged. However, our policy dictates that when an object is named, it deserves its own article. I can't vote in favor of something that breaks consistency. It would do more harm than good. As long as we can't come up with a better and thorough (!) policy to handle these cases, these articles should remain separate.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Them being stubs is definitely a terrible reason. They are two different things. A vibe is some kind of emotion (something like that I know, but I'm not too sure because I haven't player SPP in a while), and a Heart Panel are the things that let Peach use different vibes.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Per all.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} - Per all.
#{{User|New Super Mario}} - Per all.
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} PER POLICY (so Edo, the walking policy) :)
#{{User|Volatile Dweevil}} Per all.
#{{User|AnimalCrossingCool}} Per all.

===Comments===
@Koopayoshi: that is a terrible reason. --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 20:38, 9 January 2011 (EST)
:Hey tucayo, stop deleting someone's supports/opposes just because the author didn't say what he want. {{User:SWFlash/Sig}}
Yes. New stubs aren't allowed, unless they can be added to, but there are still some articles needed, including this. {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 12:19, 10 January 2011 (EST)

@Liam: But they describe two different things *facepalm* --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 16:09, 11 January 2011 (EST)

Guys, don't support because it's a stub, especially since they can be expanded. Tucayo was right in removing that vote because it is a terrible reason. I mean, why don't we just merge every stub here while we're at it? It will get rid of all our stubs, won't it? Of course that would be a bad idea, because most of the stubs '''are different things.''' {{User|Fawfulfury65}}