Editing Talk:Green Pokey
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Merging? == | == Merging? == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
We can merge only if the Japanese name is the same. What about checking the Japanese name if it's the same name, or considered separate too? --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 12:05, 14 September 2018 (EDT) | We can merge only if the Japanese name is the same. What about checking the Japanese name if it's the same name, or considered separate too? --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 12:05, 14 September 2018 (EDT) | ||
:I know this is a late reply, but they'll be the same in SS, like in English, just different in CS. Note CS also gave named color differences to various Shy Guys we have merged. Since SS considered these to simply be Pokeys, and they're clearly the original Pokeys from SMB2 and Mario Clash, having them split from the SMB2 ones seems wrong to me. Additionally, splitting the SMB2 ones from the main page would just be silly. Therefore, I believe we should merge these like the Shy Guy colors. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 02:48, September 27, 2020 (EDT) | :I know this is a late reply, but they'll be the same in SS, like in English, just different in CS. Note CS also gave named color differences to various Shy Guys we have merged. Since SS considered these to simply be Pokeys, and they're clearly the original Pokeys from SMB2 and Mario Clash, having them split from the SMB2 ones seems wrong to me. Additionally, splitting the SMB2 ones from the main page would just be silly. Therefore, I believe we should merge these like the Shy Guy colors. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 02:48, September 27, 2020 (EDT) | ||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
:::::True, but your statement simplified it down to "clearly based on design = merge with design". For Red Spike Top... Yeah, I got nothing. Only thing I can think of is that it's left split for consistency since every other TTYD enemy is actually a creative variant with stat differentiation and not affected by variant mergers. As far as I'm aware, the only merged TTYD enemies are the Iron Clefts, which the game differentiates even less than Spike Top and Red Spike Top - the only difference is that the green one has a single extra line in its Tattle Log entry (not to be confused with the Tattle itself). Either way, that's a discussion for another time and place. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 18:16, October 17, 2020 (EDT) | :::::True, but your statement simplified it down to "clearly based on design = merge with design". For Red Spike Top... Yeah, I got nothing. Only thing I can think of is that it's left split for consistency since every other TTYD enemy is actually a creative variant with stat differentiation and not affected by variant mergers. As far as I'm aware, the only merged TTYD enemies are the Iron Clefts, which the game differentiates even less than Spike Top and Red Spike Top - the only difference is that the green one has a single extra line in its Tattle Log entry (not to be confused with the Tattle itself). Either way, that's a discussion for another time and place. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 18:16, October 17, 2020 (EDT) | ||
::::::KP Koopa too, though that has some plot relevance (already covered on KP Pete's page) and a different variable name than a color. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:39, October 17, 2020 (EDT) | ::::::KP Koopa too, though that has some plot relevance (already covered on KP Pete's page) and a different variable name than a color. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:39, October 17, 2020 (EDT) | ||