Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 120: |
Line 120: |
|
| |
|
| == Split Pumpkinhead Goomba/Jack O' Goomba from the Goomba Page == | | == Split Pumpkinhead Goomba/Jack O' Goomba from the Goomba Page == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{SettledTPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|green|split into jack o' goomba 11-0}} | | {{ProposalOutcome|green|split into jack o' goomba 11-0}} |
| Currently, the Pumpkinhead Goomba, or known in SMG2, Jack O' Goomba, is merged into the Goomba page, because having unofficial name (creature was then known as just Pumpkin Head) and just be the same as a Goomba with head armor, which could be worn off with just a hit. I say that we should split it (again). Several reason are here to split it: | | Currently, the Pumpkinhead Goomba, or known in SMG2, Jack O' Goomba, is merged into the Goomba page, because having unofficial name (creature was then known as just Pumpkin Head) and just be the same as a Goomba with head armor, which could be worn off with just a hit. I say that we should split it (again). Several reason are here to split it: |
| *We now have an official name for the creature ("Jack O' Goomba"). Two, if you count "Pumpkinhead Goomba" official. | | *We now have an official name for the creature ("Jack O' Goomba"). Two, if you count "Pumpkinhead Goomba" official. |
Line 183: |
Line 183: |
|
| |
|
| == Possible conflict == | | == Possible conflict == |
| "Despite looking like Mushrooms, Goombas were based off chestnuts. This is most evident with the Goombas seen in Super Mario World." Yet we link to an article where Toshihiko Nakago specifically says they're based off shiitake mushrooms. Is it possible they're just named after chestnuts?{{User:Puddin/sig}} | | "Despite looking like Mushrooms, Goombas were based off chestnuts. This is most evident with the Goombas seen in Super Mario World." Yet we link to an article where Toshihiko Nakago specifically says they're based off shiitake mushrooms. Is it possible they're just named after chestnuts?{{User:Mason/sig}} |
|
| |
|
| == Goomboss quote == | | == Goomboss quote == |
Line 261: |
Line 261: |
|
| |
|
| ==Talk== | | ==Talk== |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{SettledTPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|cancelled|<b>I should wait</b>}} | | {{ProposalOutcome|cancelled|<b>I should wait</b>}} |
| ===Split Dem Goombas=== | | ===Split Dem Goombas=== |
| So up there ^ they are going back and forth and we are getting nowhere so this is here to help resolve the issue! | | So up there ^ they are going back and forth and we are getting nowhere so this is here to help resolve the issue! |
Line 289: |
Line 289: |
|
| |
|
| == Split the Ice Skate and Swim Ring variants from this article == | | == Split the Ice Skate and Swim Ring variants from this article == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | {{SettledTPP}} |
| {{Proposal outcome|passed|5-0|split}} | | {{ProposalOutcome|passed|5-0|split}} |
| Regarding the above discussion, it's about those in Super Mario 3D World. They have different Japanese names, and functions. One is a chillin' Goomba on a spiked white swim-ring with red stripes, and the other is on an [[Ice Skate]]. They're clearly subspecies, and ''not'' just Goomba wearing a swim-ring and/or an Ice Skate. Depending on the consensus, i will vote for support if it will pass. They are named in the encyclopedia: Skate Goomba and Innertube Goomba, but since we can't cite the encyclopedia, we'd have to use identifiers. For consistency with [[Goomba's Shoe]] and [[Shoe Goomba]]. Additionally, if this proposal fails, we'll have to revisit the Goomba's Shoe and Shoe Goomba for consistency. | | Regarding the above discussion, it's about those in Super Mario 3D World. They have different Japanese names, and functions. One is a chillin' Goomba on a spiked white swim-ring with red stripes, and the other is on an [[Ice Skate]]. They're clearly subspecies, and ''not'' just Goomba wearing a swim-ring and/or an Ice Skate. Depending on the consensus, i will vote for support if it will pass. They are named in the encyclopedia: Skate Goomba and Innertube Goomba, but since we can't cite the encyclopedia, we'd have to use identifiers. For consistency with [[Goomba's Shoe]] and [[Shoe Goomba]]. Additionally, if this proposal fails, we'll have to revisit the Goomba's Shoe and Shoe Goomba for consistency. |
|
| |
|
Line 310: |
Line 310: |
| ::::They wake up when the player gets close, and swim toward them. {{User:Obsessive Mario Fan/sig}} 17:03, August 5, 2019 (EDT) | | ::::They wake up when the player gets close, and swim toward them. {{User:Obsessive Mario Fan/sig}} 17:03, August 5, 2019 (EDT) |
| :::::I see. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 16:20, August 6, 2019 (EDT) | | :::::I see. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 16:20, August 6, 2019 (EDT) |
|
| |
| == Etymology ==
| |
|
| |
| In the etymology section, it states that they are named after chestnuts because they "look more like chestnuts than shitake mushrooms." I think it's more likely just to be a reference to their color. There is a type of brown mushroom called Chestnut Mushrooms that look closer in shape to Goombas than the wide, flat tops of a shitake. They are called "kuribo kinoko" in Japanese, and are cultivated and eaten in Japan. --[[Special:Contributions/157.21.14.65|157.21.14.65]] 12:50, September 2, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Are Goombas Mushrooms? ==
| |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| {{Proposal outcome|no quorum|0-0}}
| |
| As I know from a fan base, Goombas are like mutant mushrooms. This makes me think that Goombas are Mushrooms. I want to know if this is true, because there were no instances in which any Goomba is called a Mushroom on purpose. I am holding a debate to decide whether or not this article should state that goombas are related to Mushrooms. Some reasons are:
| |
| * Goombas look like mushrooms with feet.
| |
| * Mushrooms have a round shape, like Goombas.
| |
| * [[Koopa Troopa]]s can be called turtles because they look like turtles.
| |
| * Only [[Rotten Mushroom]]s and [[Zombie Mushroom]]s are technically mutant mushrooms, and it’s almost Halloween, so why not Goombas?
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer:''' [[User:OhoJeeOnFire|OhoJeeOnFire]] ([[User talk:OhoJeeOnFire|talk]])<br>
| |
| '''Deadline:''' October 22, 2021, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| === Support ===
| |
| === Oppose ===
| |
| === Comments ===
| |
|
| |
| …Why does this need a proposal?
| |
|
| |
| Why is the deadline in the Comments section?
| |
|
| |
| What exactly do those points mean?
| |
|
| |
| My head hurts from looking at this. [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 17:05, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :The article already says that Goombas resemble Shiitake mushrooms, which I think is good enough. This proposal honestly doesn't make much sense to me. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 17:28, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::I wanted to see if Goombas can be considered mushrooms, for I was going to make a Halloween picture of a Goomba.
| |
|
| |
| —-[[User:OhoJeeOnFire|OhoJeeOnFire]] ([[User talk:OhoJeeOnFire|talk]]) 18:44, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::Now I'm even more confused. When you say "mushroom," do you mean the generic group of organisms or the item? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:56, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::::The item
| |
| —-[[User:OhoJeeOnFire|OhoJeeOnFire]] ([[User talk:OhoJeeOnFire|talk]]) 18:59, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Proposals are not the sort of matter to help decide on non-wiki-related stuff. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 19:03, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::::'''''Technically''''' speaking, the original sprite of Goomba in SMB is a quick edit of the item's sprite they made when they decided Troopas were too complex for a "most basic" enemy. That's pretty much the only link, though. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:12, October 8, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Cursed Goomba? ==
| |
|
| |
| I heard of the cursed goomba meme on YouTube. This is a gif that shows it.
| |
| [[File:Cursed Goomba.gif|150px]]
| |
|
| |
| Should this be added to the article? I personally don’t think so but I want to know what you think. {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}
| |
| :...No, it's a meme, it's not from a Mario game. So no. [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 20:13, November 4, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::Fan content doesn't belong here. If anything, it would be covered on [[List of Mario references on the Internet]], but it doesn't seem very noteworthy. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 20:14, November 4, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::Well… I could make a section about the YouTuber and this goomba in the Mario References on the internet page, under YouTube, but I don’t know if it is acceptable. Is it? —-{{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}} 10:27, November 5, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::::The internet is filled to the brim with this sort of thing, so I don't think it should be mentioned there either. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 19:15, November 5, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::::I see… thanks for your time. {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}
| |
| ::::::One more thing: could I just add it to the article with a simple summary? I need to clear my amount of personal images and I don’t want to delete any. {{User:OhoJeeOnFire/sig}}
| |
| :::::::You've already been told it's not worth covering on either article, so no. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:02, November 18, 2021 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Goomba Variant/Relative Ontological Issue ==
| |
|
| |
| There seems to be a sort of inconsistency/irrationality to the way the wiki classifies species that are similar to and/or derived from goombas. I find it very strange that beanies and shrooblets are classified as being "variants" of goombas (despite not being chestnut/mushrooms physically and instead being beans & aliens respectively), while galoombas (which were retroactively renamed and deemed distinct and were originally just the goombas of SMW) are considered to be mere "relatives" of goombas. The principle I see cited in most of these discussions pertaining to these sort of classifications (for example rocky wrenches being either koopas or monty moles) is that if an enemy/species is spiritually/conceptually derived from a more established and older one, then the former can be considered to be a variant of the latter. If this were consistently applied, galoombas, strollin' stus, and wanderin' gooms should definitely be considered to be types of goombas. {{unsigned|Ladishchap}}
| |
| :The reason Galoomba is only a relative and not a variant is because newer games have explicitly stated they're two different-yet-related things ([https://www.mariowiki.com/Galoomba#Mario_Party:_Star_Rush_2 "A Goomba-like foe that is not a Goomba."]). Strollin' Stu is more of a conceptual derivative of Goomba via things like Kug, so I'd agree to consider that a variant. Wanderin' Goom I think is best left as is, as it looks more like a Galoomba and doesn't exactly function like either (as in it doesn't attack and gets defeated in one hit). And we considered [[Shrooblet]] to be a goomba because...what else could it possibly be other than a shroobified goomba? Even if it's not exactly a brown mushroom with dark brown shoes, [[Porcupuffer|enemies don't]] [[Octoomba|always have]] [[Lantern Ghost|to be]] [[Fishin' Boo|the same species]] [[Piranha Sprout|or have]] [[Cataquack|similar designs]] to be variants or relatives. But Galoomba was explicitly stated to not be a goomba in later games, so it's not a goomba variant but rather a relative. [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 08:54, May 13, 2022 (EDT)
| |
| ::Does "A is a variant of B" mean "A is based on B" or "A is a B"? [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 18:30, May 13, 2022 (EDT)
| |
| :::Both. [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 18:36, May 13, 2022 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == New Goomba voices in Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope? ==
| |
|
| |
| This might be a goofy question, but is this the first Mario game to have new voices for Goombas? I don't recall any Mario game that I’ve played that had these voices for Goombas. They don’t sound like they did in Mario Party 8, for example. If this is new for them, should it be mentioned on the article? [[User:Mason Popovich]] December 15, 2022. 17:05 (EST)
| |
| :This is the only time I've heard these voice clips (I have no idea how they sound in Mario Party 8), so I think it's worth mentioning in the section that Goombas have new voice clips for this game. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 17:20, December 15, 2022 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Okay. I’ll add this in the ''Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope'' section for Goombas. Thank you. [[User:Mason Popovich]] December 15, 17:23 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == History Section ==
| |
|
| |
| Anyone think the history section is far too long? {{User:Mushroom Head/sig}} 10:21, July 25, 2023 (EDT)
| |
| :This is a late response but we should first attempt to trim words down if they're too wordy and also cut down on images. To trim words, we should look at maybe plot synopses of Mario RPG games, for instance. {{User:Mario/sig}} 16:56, December 2, 2023 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == What's happening!? ==
| |
|
| |
| What's going on!? Burbos and Gamboos are one thing but why are galoombas, Octoombas and Goombrats relatives of goomba's when they're supposed to be variants/derived subjects someone please explain to me what's going on!? who did this!? [[Special:Contributions/148.252.128.107|148.252.128.107]] 16:04, August 13, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I implore you to read some official profiles we have on [[Galoomba#Profiles and statistics|Galoomba]]. The ''[[Perfect Edition of the Great Mario Character Encyclopedia|Perfect Ban Mario Character Daijiten]]'' states that these enemies are ''relatives'' of Goomba (thus, not variants/derived subjects); furthermore, the [[Character Museum]] profile for Galoomba in ''[[Mario Party: Star Rush]]'' clearly states that Galoombas are NOT Goombas, meaning that they cannot be variants of Goombas at all. Moving over to [[Goombrat#Profiles and statistics|Goombrat]], the description for the Goombrat Statue in ''[[Super Mario Run]]'' states that "Nobody is quite sure of their exact relation to Goombas" (so if anything, calling them even "relatives" might be a stretch; they're definitely not variants of Goomba, that's for sure). All that remains is Octoomba, who you may quite notice doesn't look much like a Goomba compared to Galoombas and Goombrats; it's a Goomba-shaped space octopus more in common with [[Octoguy]], [[Rocto]] and their leaders [[King Kaliente]] and [[Prince Pikante]]; so by logical deduction, these shouldn't be regarded as variants of Goombas either.<br>Also, "Derived subjects" was to be a counterpart to "Subject origin", which has been discontinued per a passed proposal, due to frequent misuse and general confusion (Subject origin was supposed to be the real-life inspiration for something, but fictional ''Mario'' critters gradually began taking that spot too); so, I moved the remaining subjects [[Beanie]] and [[Strollin' Stu]] to "Relatives" as well. {{User:Arend/sig}} 16:21, August 13, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::What even is a variant then? Because I'm still not sure what criteria are being used. If Goombrats aren't a variant of Goombas, are Shymores one of Shy Guys? Sharpeas? Toothys? And why? [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 17:55, August 13, 2024 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Goomba ==
| |
|
| |
| Now, this isn't contributing or anything, but do the admins have archived the removed pages? It's just that I wanted to see the [[Super Mario Bros. (film)|SMB movie]] article for goombas. [[User:Weegie baby|Weegie baby]] ([[User talk:Weegie baby|talk]]) 08:48, November 11, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :You may see it [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Goomba_(film_species)&diff=4253672&oldid=4216685 here] on the page's history. That's why I prefer merged pages be redirected rather than deleted outright. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:08, November 11, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::Thank you. [[User:Weegie baby|Weegie baby]] ([[User talk:Weegie baby|talk]]) 13:16, November 11, 2024 (EST)
| |