Editing Talk:Golf

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 29: Line 29:


== Mario in Golf. ==
== Mario in Golf. ==
{{talk}}
That is Mario. Ossan is just an internal development name for Mario back during the development of DK. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 13:08, January 05, 2023 (CST)
That is Mario. Ossan is just an internal development name for Mario back during the development of DK. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 13:08, January 05, 2023 (CST)
:So, I've actually been meaning to revisit this, and I guess now's a good a time as any. I really think there's a mix-up here. The source for Mario being in NES ''Golf'' is page 9 of ''Mario Mania'' and {{file link|SMCE page 85.jpg|page 85}} of ''Super Mario Zen Hyakka''. Game Boy ''Golf'', meanwhile, is virtually a separate game, as it not only doubles the number of courses but has entirely different course layouts. The sources stating that Mario is in Game Boy ''Golf'' are ''Mario Mania'' once again, {{file link|PEGMCE page 239.jpg|page 239}} of ''Perfect Ban Mario Character Daijiten'' (which oddly enough seems to picture the NES game while describing the GB one), and {{file link|ZSMOH page 128.jpg|page 128}} of Keibunsha's (probably licensed) ''Zen Super Mario ŌHyakka''. The more recent ''Encyclopedia Super Mario Bros.'' neglects to mention either version of ''Golf'', and Mister Wu says that neither does ''Super Mario Bros. Daizukan'' (only showing ''Mario Open Golf'') or ''Super Mario Pia'' (only showing ''Family Computer Golf: Japan Course''). Tellingly, [https://www.nintendo.co.jp/character/mario/archives/index.html Mario Portal] lists the Famicom derivatives of ''Golf'' featuring definitely-Mario (''Golf: Japan Course'', ''Golf: US Course'', and ''Mario Open Golf''), but not the original ''Golf''. The [https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%B4%E3%83%AB%E3%83%95_(%E4%BB%BB%E5%A4%A9%E5%A0%82) Japanese Wikipedia] article for ''Golf'' vaguely claims that it was deconfirmed to be Mario at another point (besides ''Captain Rainbow'') in a Family Computer Magazine / Famimaga feature, but it isn't specific enough. What about manuals and packaging? As far as I can tell, nothing has ever explicitly referred to the player character as Mario; the closest this comes to that is the western cover art for the Game Boy version, in which the golfer from the back looks a lot like Mario wearing a slightly different hat and cleats, but unlike ''Alleyway'', the sprites in the game depict a mustache-less character. I think there was an unfortunate combination of the western cover art (which seems to be an artist trying to attract sales) and the multitide of other similar golf games featuring definitely-Mario that caused confusion. And then there's Ossan in ''Captain Rainbow'', who is identified as the golfer. I know "Ossan" was a development name for Mario, but it's generic enough to be a coincidence. [https://www.youtube.com/embed/j2Zeajm2BMc?start=27&end=33 Look at this character.] The joke isn't that he's Mario, but that he stuffs his golfballs down his pants, which is decidedly un-Mario. All in all, perhaps there have been inklings of Mario being the golfer in past supplemental material, but that idea has been abandoned. But since this is such a unique case that may have been true at one point, I'd like to present the following solution: '''Classify ''Golf'' as historically significant.''' [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 19:20, January 7, 2023 (EST)
:So, I've actually been meaning to revisit this, and I guess now's a good a time as any. I really think there's a mix-up here. The source for Mario being in NES ''Golf'' is page 9 of ''Mario Mania'' and {{media link|SMCE page 85.jpg|page 85}} of ''Super Mario Zen Hyakka''. Game Boy ''Golf'', meanwhile, is virtually a separate game, as it not only doubles the number of courses but has entirely different course layouts. The sources stating that Mario is in Game Boy ''Golf'' are ''Mario Mania'' once again, {{media link|PEGMCE page 239.jpg|page 239}} of ''Perfect Ban Mario Character Daijiten'' (which oddly enough seems to picture the NES game while describing the GB one), and {{media link|ZSMOH page 128.jpg|page 128}} of Keibunsha's (probably licensed) ''Zen Super Mario ŌHyakka''. The more recent ''Encyclopedia Super Mario Bros.'' neglects to mention either version of ''Golf'', and Mister Wu says that neither does ''Super Mario Bros. Daizukan'' (only showing ''Mario Open Golf'') or ''Super Mario Pia'' (only showing ''Family Computer Golf: Japan Course''). Tellingly, [https://www.nintendo.co.jp/character/mario/archives/index.html Mario Portal] lists the Famicom derivatives of ''Golf'' featuring definitely-Mario (''Golf: Japan Course'', ''Golf: US Course'', and ''Mario Open Golf''), but not the original ''Golf''. The [https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%B4%E3%83%AB%E3%83%95_(%E4%BB%BB%E5%A4%A9%E5%A0%82) Japanese Wikipedia] article for ''Golf'' vaguely claims that it was deconfirmed to be Mario at another point (besides ''Captain Rainbow'') in a Family Computer Magazine / Famimaga feature, but it isn't specific enough. What about manuals and packaging? As far as I can tell, nothing has ever explicitly referred to the player character as Mario; the closest this comes to that is the western cover art for the Game Boy version, in which the golfer from the back looks a lot like Mario wearing a slightly different hat and cleats, but unlike ''Alleyway'', the sprites in the game depict a mustache-less character. I think there was an unfortunate combination of the western cover art (which seems to be an artist trying to attract sales) and the multitide of other similar golf games featuring definitely-Mario that caused confusion. And then there's Ossan in ''Captain Rainbow'', who is identified as the golfer. I know "Ossan" was a development name for Mario, but it's generic enough to be a coincidence. [https://www.youtube.com/embed/j2Zeajm2BMc?start=27&end=33 Look at this character.] The joke isn't that he's Mario, but that he stuffs his golfballs down his pants, which is decidedly un-Mario. All in all, perhaps there have been inklings of Mario being the golfer in past supplemental material, but that idea has been abandoned. But since this is such a unique case that may have been true at one point, I'd like to present the following solution: '''Classify ''Golf'' as historically significant.''' [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 19:20, January 7, 2023 (EST)
::Wow! That is a lot! How about we just agree to disagree? That can solve a lot of conflicts. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 11:01, January 24, 2023 (CST)
::Wow! That is a lot! How about we just agree to disagree? That can solve a lot of conflicts. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 11:01, January 24, 2023 (CST)


Line 39: Line 40:


== Virtual Boy game's situation ==
== Virtual Boy game's situation ==
{{talk}}
{{talk}}
I want to discuss whether the ''{{wp|Golf (1995 video game)|Golf}}'' for the [[Virtual Boy]] should count as a successor to the NES ''Golf'' or a wholly unrelated game that happens to have the same basic generic title. The US release points to the former, as it is internally branded ''Nintendo Golf'' in the background of the main menu and end of the credits, and it was published by Nintendo; but in its home country of Japan, it was published by its third-party developer, T&E Soft, and its title is ''T&E Virtual Golf'' on the box and in-game. It seems the "Nintendo" branding is specific to the US release, so should this be considered a third-party game dolled up into a first-party game's successor? Or just an unrelated game all around (noting that {{wp|T&E Soft}} has a long resume of golf games)? On another note, ''Mario Golf'' on the Nintendo 64 seems to borrow some gameplay elements from this one, like the ball-landing grid square. For reference, [https://youtu.be/YvcLiwgLLXg here is a playthrough of the US release], and [https://www.virtual-boy.com/games/golf/images/ here is paraphernalia associated with both games]. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:24, August 8, 2023 (EDT)
I want to discuss whether the ''{{wp|Golf (1995 video game)|Golf}}'' for the [[Virtual Boy]] should count as a successor to the NES ''Golf'' or a wholly unrelated game that happens to have the same basic generic title. The US release points to the former, as it is internally branded ''Nintendo Golf'' in the background of the main menu and end of the credits, and it was published by Nintendo; but in its home country of Japan, it was published by its third-party developer, T&E Soft, and its title is ''T&E Virtual Golf'' on the box and in-game. It seems the "Nintendo" branding is specific to the US release, so should this be considered a third-party game dolled up into a first-party game's successor? Or just an unrelated game all around (noting that {{wp|T&E Soft}} has a long resume of golf games)? On another note, ''Mario Golf'' on the Nintendo 64 seems to borrow some gameplay elements from this one, like the ball-landing grid square. For reference, [https://youtu.be/YvcLiwgLLXg here is a playthrough of the US release], and [https://www.virtual-boy.com/games/golf/images/ here is paraphernalia associated with both games]. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:24, August 8, 2023 (EDT)
:I don't know why ''Golf'' VB is considered a "successor". Nintendo can make games about golfing that aren't related to this game or ''Mario Golf'' in general. A similar situation like this is with ''Game Boy Gallery'', but at least original Australian series name referred ''Game & Watch Gallery'' as ''Game Boy Gallery'' successor. However, there is no connection between ''Golf'' VB and the ''Mario Golf'' series aside from somewhat similar gameplay {{User:Starluxe/sig}} 10:07, October 5, 2024 (GMT)


== Split the VS. System and Game Boy games ==
== Split the VS. System and Game Boy games ==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|7-0|split}}
 
As part of my recent project of improving sports game coverage, I have worked heavily on this page. The problem is that it covers three distinct games (one of which itself has three different variations), and while this made some degree of sense when the article was short, now that differences and hole maps for each have been added, this page now looks bloated and awkward for it, and I'm still not done adding information for things such as the clubs and the GB sprites. The games in question:
As part of my recent project of improving sports game coverage, I have worked heavily on this page. The problem is that it covers three distinct games (one of which itself has three different variations), and while this made some degree of sense when the article was short, now that differences and hole maps for each have been added, this page now looks bloated and awkward for it, and I'm still not done adding information for things such as the clubs and the GB sprites. The games in question:


Line 59: Line 60:
===Support===
===Support===
#{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - BIRDIE TRY!
#{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - BIRDIE TRY!
#{{User|Pseudo}} This seems sensible — if they’re different games, they’re different games.
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} We've split every other Vs. arcade game (as far as we can tell, anyways?), so why Golf gets to be an exception is beyond us. And then, of course, we might as well split the Game Boy version as well for consistency's sake. ;P
#{{User|MegaBowser64}} Sure thing.
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Per all.
#{{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} Might as well. MIGHT be a stretch, but if the various Vs. versions have enough differences for them to be split after this, I'm all for it.
#{{User|DrippingYellow}} Per all.


===Oppose===
===Oppose===


===Comments===
===Comments===

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)