Editing Talk:Gate Guy
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Move to all-caps names== | ==Move to all-caps names== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
The names of the duel boards in ''Mario Party 3'' are written in all-caps in-game (and even in the manual). Per [[MarioWiki:Naming]], this effectively makes them their official names. If we refer to [[TOAD in the Box]], [[BOB-OMB Barrage]], [[TOAD Bandstand]], and [[BOWSER's Big Blast]] by their stylised names, I think we should have the same courtesy for the ''MP3'' duel boards. (Affected articles: [[Gate Guy]], [[Arrowhead]], [[Pipesqueak]], [[Blowhard]], [[Mr. Mover]], [[Backtrack]].) | The names of the duel boards in ''Mario Party 3'' are written in all-caps in-game (and even in the manual). Per [[MarioWiki:Naming]], this effectively makes them their official names. If we refer to [[TOAD in the Box]], [[BOB-OMB Barrage]], [[TOAD Bandstand]], and [[BOWSER's Big Blast]] by their stylised names, I think we should have the same courtesy for the ''MP3'' duel boards. (Affected articles: [[Gate Guy]], [[Arrowhead]], [[Pipesqueak]], [[Blowhard]], [[Mr. Mover]], [[Backtrack]].) | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
#{{User|3D Player 2010}} Per proposal | #{{User|3D Player 2010}} Per proposal | ||
#{{User|AfternoonLight}} I agree with all of you! We can also do that for Battle Royale boards like [[Chilly Waters]] and [[Waluigi's Island]]. | #{{User|AfternoonLight}} I agree with all of you! We can also do that for Battle Royale boards like [[Chilly Waters]] and [[Waluigi's Island]]. | ||
====Don't move==== | ====Don't move==== | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
You think this should be a mainspace proposal instead of a TPP, as it affects multiple articles? {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 16:11, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | You think this should be a mainspace proposal instead of a TPP, as it affects multiple articles? {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 16:11, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
:According to the rules of proposing, one week is allowed for regular proposals while two weeks are allowed for talk page proposals. I find that rule kind of ridiculous as all proposals should have the same amount of time. I think {{user|RickTommy}} wants two weeks worth of discussion. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:21, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | :According to the rules of proposing, one week is allowed for regular proposals while two weeks are allowed for talk page proposals. I find that rule kind of ridiculous as all proposals should have the same amount of time. I think {{user|RickTommy}} wants two weeks worth of discussion. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:21, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
::Well, you're free to challenge that. I mean, [[MarioWiki:Proposals/ | ::Well, you're free to challenge that. I mean, [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_31#Reduce_the_Talk_Page_Proposal_deadline_to_one_week|there had been an attempt in the past]]. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 16:29, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
This shouldn't have been in this talk page. Otherwise, it might be difficult to find this talk page proposal if anyone tries to refer to it in the future. On this proposal itself I suppose you have a point. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 20:22, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | This shouldn't have been in this talk page. Otherwise, it might be difficult to find this talk page proposal if anyone tries to refer to it in the future. On this proposal itself I suppose you have a point. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 20:22, 2 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
