Editing Talk:Garnet Star
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Pokémon Trivia == | == Pokémon Trivia == | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
Many users, including myself, have put in a piece of trivia which is "The Garnet Star is the only Crystal Star that does not share its name with a Pokémon Game." or something similar, only to have it deleted for reasons such as "Unessesary" or "Not Mario-Related". Well, is it really necessary to put in whether planets in [[Super Mario Galaxy]] only reachable through hacks are solid or not? This piece is more informative than those, but the other has a place in trivia and this one doesn't. As for not Mario-Related what about a piece of trivia from the [[Coin]] article, "The Poko from Pikmin 2 bear a strong resemblance to Coins." That relates to Mario as much as this one does. I believe the definition of trivia is a fun fact that is not notable enough to be in the main article, but can be placed as "Trivia". This is notable enough to be a piece of trivia. Also, not everyone may be able to find this out, if they don't play Pokémon they most likely wouldn't know. It is necessary to create a proposal for this, because this trivia piece is continuously being deleted. If this proposal passes this piece of trivia will be put into the article and ''not'' be deleted. However, if this proposal ''fails'' the trivia piece should never be attempted to get added in the article again. | Many users, including myself, have put in a piece of trivia which is "The Garnet Star is the only Crystal Star that does not share its name with a Pokémon Game." or something similar, only to have it deleted for reasons such as "Unessesary" or "Not Mario-Related". Well, is it really necessary to put in whether planets in [[Super Mario Galaxy]] only reachable through hacks are solid or not? This piece is more informative than those, but the other has a place in trivia and this one doesn't. As for not Mario-Related what about a piece of trivia from the [[Coin]] article, "The Poko from Pikmin 2 bear a strong resemblance to Coins." That relates to Mario as much as this one does. I believe the definition of trivia is a fun fact that is not notable enough to be in the main article, but can be placed as "Trivia". This is notable enough to be a piece of trivia. Also, not everyone may be able to find this out, if they don't play Pokémon they most likely wouldn't know. It is necessary to create a proposal for this, because this trivia piece is continuously being deleted. If this proposal passes this piece of trivia will be put into the article and ''not'' be deleted. However, if this proposal ''fails'' the trivia piece should never be attempted to get added in the article again. | ||
Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
:::I'm not saying it was a reference, I'm saying it is a coincidence, we do have pieces of trivia that are coincidences. {{User|Koopa K}} | :::I'm not saying it was a reference, I'm saying it is a coincidence, we do have pieces of trivia that are coincidences. {{User|Koopa K}} | ||
::::If we do, we should't have them. Coincidences happen so often that there's no point in mentioning them unless it's something really specific. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] ([[User talk:GreenDisaster|talk]]) 12:26, 9 September 2012 (EDT) | ::::If we do, we should't have them. Coincidences happen so often that there's no point in mentioning them unless it's something really specific. [[User:GreenDisaster|GreenDisaster]] ([[User talk:GreenDisaster|talk]]) 12:26, 9 September 2012 (EDT) | ||