Editing Talk:Frost Piranha
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Putrid Piranha == | == Putrid Piranha == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
Why is this considered a variant of Putrid Piranha? I get that they have the same sprite, but Ice Piranhas have the same sprite as Fire Piranhas, and the former are just counted as a Piranha Plant variant. Besides, facing sideways seems to be standard for the spittier Piranhas and Goombario's tattle basically treats it as a Piranha Plant, but icier. | Why is this considered a variant of Putrid Piranha? I get that they have the same sprite, but Ice Piranhas have the same sprite as Fire Piranhas, and the former are just counted as a Piranha Plant variant. Besides, facing sideways seems to be standard for the spittier Piranhas and Goombario's tattle basically treats it as a Piranha Plant, but icier. | ||
[[Special:Contributions/85.243.109.179|85.243.109.179]] 16:00, December 29, 2020 (EST) | [[Special:Contributions/85.243.109.179|85.243.109.179]] 16:00, December 29, 2020 (EST) | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
A little old, but I figured this should have attention in light of the Ice Piranha merge. Does it still make sense to consider it a Putrid Piranha variant now? It somewhat broke the rule that we follow for RPG enemies, in which subsequent variants are generally considered variants of the base variants instead of variants of variants unless stated otherwise. They're also a depicted a bit inconsistently in the ''Paper Mario'' series to begin with, both appearance and attack-wise (e.g. no Putrid-esque attack in at least one of the games). Would it be better to list Putrid Piranha as a relative instead, a la Fire Piranha? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 04:48, May 20, 2023 (EDT) | A little old, but I figured this should have attention in light of the Ice Piranha merge. Does it still make sense to consider it a Putrid Piranha variant now? It somewhat broke the rule that we follow for RPG enemies, in which subsequent variants are generally considered variants of the base variants instead of variants of variants unless stated otherwise. They're also a depicted a bit inconsistently in the ''Paper Mario'' series to begin with, both appearance and attack-wise (e.g. no Putrid-esque attack in at least one of the games). Would it be better to list Putrid Piranha as a relative instead, a la Fire Piranha? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 04:48, May 20, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:Considering the debut puts it as a separate "line" of enemies than the lone Piranha Plant and Putrid Piranhas are already treated as affiliated with the Lava Piranha (ie a Fire Piranha), I don't really think it's necessary. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:53, May 20, 2023 (EDT) | :Considering the debut puts it as a separate "line" of enemies than the lone Piranha Plant and Putrid Piranhas are already treated as affiliated with the Lava Piranha (ie a Fire Piranha), I don't really think it's necessary. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:53, May 20, 2023 (EDT) | ||