Editing Talk:Flagman

== Delete ==

{{talk}}
According to the comments in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_53#Delete_certain_Game_.26_Watch_game_articles|this proposal]], this article (and I'm assuming ''[[Lion]]'' as well) was excluded because it's appeared in some form in other ''Mario'' games. However, those already have [[Flagman D-D|their]] [[Game & Watch Flagman|own]] [[Game & Watch Lion|articles]], so I don't see why these need to stay. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 00:46, July 16, 2019 (EDT)

I believe the ''Flagman'' and ''Lion'' articles help people better understand the gameplay of the original Game & Watch games. The pages about their remakes talk about the gameplay in the ''Mario'' games, which can be slightly different. [[User:Dwhitney|Dwhitney]] ([[User talk:Dwhitney|talk]]) 17:39, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

:By that logic you'd have to create pages for games every Nintendo-themed microgame is based on. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 08:02, September 18, 2019 (EDT)
::For consistency with the others, and since it has a substancial history, it should be turned into a redirect, but not merge the content themselves. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:29, September 18, 2019 (EDT)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Delete ==
-According to the comments in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/53#Delete_certain_Game_.26_Watch_game_articles|this proposal]], this article (and I'm assuming ''[[Lion]]'' as well) was excluded because it's appeared in some form in other ''Mario'' games. However, those already have [[Flagman D-D|their]] [[Game & Watch Flagman|own]] [[Game & Watch Lion|articles]], so I don't see why these need to stay. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 00:46, July 16, 2019 (EDT)
+{{talk}}
+According to the comments in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_53#Delete_certain_Game_.26_Watch_game_articles|this proposal]], this article (and I'm assuming ''[[Lion]]'' as well) was excluded because it's appeared in some form in other ''Mario'' games. However, those already have [[Flagman D-D|their]] [[Game & Watch Flagman|own]] [[Game & Watch Lion|articles]], so I don't see why these need to stay. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 00:46, July 16, 2019 (EDT)
 I believe the ''Flagman'' and ''Lion'' articles help people better understand the gameplay of the original Game & Watch games. The pages about their remakes talk about the gameplay in the ''Mario'' games, which can be slightly different. [[User:Dwhitney|Dwhitney]] ([[User talk:Dwhitney|talk]]) 17:39, July 24, 2019 (EDT)
@@ Line 7: / Line 8: @@
 :By that logic you'd have to create pages for games every Nintendo-themed microgame is based on. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 08:02, September 18, 2019 (EDT)
 ::For consistency with the others, and since it has a substancial history, it should be turned into a redirect, but not merge the content themselves. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 09:29, September 18, 2019 (EDT)
-:::Yeah, I don't see the point of keeping this. I support deletion. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 23:17, September 23, 2019 (EDT)
-:::@FOY: Why would a substantial history factor into whether or not something should be deleted? A lot of pages have been deleted even with a substantial history. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 23:36, September 23, 2019 (EDT)
-----
-:So...what is the deal here. Could we not merge some of the article into the actual mario related content it is used in of [[Game & Watch Gallery 3]]? [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig]] - 12:12, October 30, 2019 (EDT)
-::There's no reason to merge it since there's no Mario-related info to mention. For reference, see [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/53#Delete certain Game & Watch game articles|this proposal]] from earlier this year that resulted in the removal of several articles on Game & Watch games that weren't Mario-relevant. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:24, October 30, 2019 (EDT)
-I would just redirect the page. It has absolutely nothing to do with Mario. [[User:NintendogsFan|NintendogsFan]] ([[User talk:NintendogsFan|talk]]) 18:56, November 26, 2019 (EST)