Editing Talk:Fawfulized

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 5: Line 5:
{{unsigned|155.143.16.99}}
{{unsigned|155.143.16.99}}
:If I remember correctly (it's been a while since I played BIS) it's regular things brainwashed into following Fawful. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 17:35, 30 November 2015 (EST)
:If I remember correctly (it's been a while since I played BIS) it's regular things brainwashed into following Fawful. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 17:35, 30 November 2015 (EST)
==Delete?==
==Delete?==
{{talk}}
It was pointed out to me (on another website) that this page is just a list of Fawful-related things, from things he built to things he may have brainwashed or merely tampered with. The latter category includes things ([[Sea Pipe Statue]], Peach's Castle) that don't have any of the trademark Fawful features, and seem ill-placed here, but really, the entire page seems unnecessary. There's no real reason to take "Fawfulization" as a literal process - Fawful makes up words all the time as he chatters away. At least for [[Shroobified]], the game explicitly showed things turning into [[Shroob Mushroom]]s, but even then, I'm dubious about that list too. But this page, for sure, just seems unnecessary. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 23:20, 27 January 2016 (EST)
It was pointed out to me (on another website) that this page is just a list of Fawful-related things, from things he built to things he may have brainwashed or merely tampered with. The latter category includes things ([[Sea Pipe Statue]], Peach's Castle) that don't have any of the trademark Fawful features, and seem ill-placed here, but really, the entire page seems unnecessary. There's no real reason to take "Fawfulization" as a literal process - Fawful makes up words all the time as he chatters away. At least for [[Shroobified]], the game explicitly showed things turning into [[Shroob Mushroom]]s, but even then, I'm dubious about that list too. But this page, for sure, just seems unnecessary. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 23:20, 27 January 2016 (EST)
:One question: does Fawful use this term frequently, like declaring it whenever this "Fawfulization" happens? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 23:43, 27 January 2016 (EST)
:One question: does Fawful use this term frequently, like declaring it whenever this "Fawfulization" happens? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 23:43, 27 January 2016 (EST)
Line 15: Line 15:
::::::Like, a "list of things that resemble Fawful in BIS" section? Seems unnecessary. Just skim the enemy list in the template any everything that sounds like him looks like him. I'd suggest making a category, but again, hard to think of a non-crappy name that sounds justifiable since "Fawfulized" itself doesn't seem to apply to the Fawful-ish enemies. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 19:21, 29 January 2016 (EST)
::::::Like, a "list of things that resemble Fawful in BIS" section? Seems unnecessary. Just skim the enemy list in the template any everything that sounds like him looks like him. I'd suggest making a category, but again, hard to think of a non-crappy name that sounds justifiable since "Fawfulized" itself doesn't seem to apply to the Fawful-ish enemies. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 19:21, 29 January 2016 (EST)
:::::::Why not put all the fawfulized enemies in the Beanish category, I look to the "Shroobified" article since it's somewhat similar to the Fawfulized thing, there is a Shroob category and they are some shroobified enemy that appear on this category. The reason the fawfulized enemies could go in the Beanish category is because Fawful is a beanish and the fawfulized enemies look like Fawful. Like how the shroobified enemies appear on the Shroob category.--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}}  19:36, 29 January 2016 (EST)
:::::::Why not put all the fawfulized enemies in the Beanish category, I look to the "Shroobified" article since it's somewhat similar to the Fawfulized thing, there is a Shroob category and they are some shroobified enemy that appear on this category. The reason the fawfulized enemies could go in the Beanish category is because Fawful is a beanish and the fawfulized enemies look like Fawful. Like how the shroobified enemies appear on the Shroob category.--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}}  19:36, 29 January 2016 (EST)
::::::::I'm going to chime in and say I think it's doomed. The page title is misleading, as well; this page is more of a list of Fawfulized enemies, whereas the title implies that it's about Fawfulization. But that's just my opinion. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 20:46, 29 January 2016 (EST)
:::::::::They're not really Beanish things, tho? Most of them are robots, and the organic things don't have any sprout or Beanish accents, just Fawful grins and glasses. Furthermore, all the ''M&L:SS'' Beanish things were in the Beanbean Kingdom, whereas ''BIS'' was set entirely in the Mushroom Kingdom - and the mere fact that they're completely different games with separate sets of enemies also makes this rather different than the Shroobified situation. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 00:37, 30 January 2016 (EST)
::::::::::"Fawful enemies" for a category name might work? {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 01:00, 30 January 2016 (EST)
:::::::::::I'm the one who suggested Walkazo to delete the page in the first place. But I agree that this could work as a category. However, shouldn't we contact the guy who created this useless page in the first place? He might have an idea of what to do next. [[User:Madz the Penguin|Madz the Penguin]] ([[User talk:Madz the Penguin|talk]]) 22:14, 30 January 2016 (EST)
::::::::::::The creator, {{user|Zaimoon}}, hasn't been active in the wiki since 2014. Besides, the page is wiki community property, not the creator's one; if there is a good consensus among reputable users and staff, we don't need their approval to do action with the page. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 22:17, 30 January 2016 (EST)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)