Editing Talk:Elite Gritty Goomba

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 28: Line 28:
:...And? You're bringing up the point of names over and over again, but the Gritty Goombas are very clearly different enemies. Merging things solely for having the same name is a slippery slope that nobody wants to go down. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
:...And? You're bringing up the point of names over and over again, but the Gritty Goombas are very clearly different enemies. Merging things solely for having the same name is a slippery slope that nobody wants to go down. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
::It's pretty common for there to be variants of enemies that aren't actually supposed to be different species altogether, just look at the four Koopa colors (which act differently and give Yoshi different powers, which is more than just a palette swap). [[User:Binarystep|Binarystep]] ([[User talk:Binarystep|talk]]) 00:59, 23 March 2015 (EDT)
::It's pretty common for there to be variants of enemies that aren't actually supposed to be different species altogether, just look at the four Koopa colors (which act differently and give Yoshi different powers, which is more than just a palette swap). [[User:Binarystep|Binarystep]] ([[User talk:Binarystep|talk]]) 00:59, 23 March 2015 (EDT)
:::The Koopas aren't a good example to use when we have literally ''[[List of species|hundreds]]'' of other species that are clearly intended to be separate. One may not follow the pattern, but there are many more that do. What do you think we should follow: the ones that are consistent or the one that's inconsistent? You seem to be getting caught up on the fact that the enemies share the same name, but let me make this explicitly clear: '''the names should not be the sole deciding factor'''. The Gritty Goombas here have parallel characteristics with all of those enemies that I listed alongside many more enemies. If the names were what decided if articles should be merged, the [[Galoomba|Goombas]] from Super Mario World would have been merged to the main Goomba despite being clearly different until they were eventually given the name "Galoomba", or the film adaptations of characters like [[Mario (film character)|Mario]], [[Luigi (film character)|Luigi]], and [[President Koopa]] would have been kept in the main articles despite being so drastically different, or, heck, [[Buzz (character)|Buzz the human golfer]] would be in the same article as [[Buzz (enemy)|Buzz the bee enemy]]. You're looking at one sole aspect of the enemies and acting as if that should be the only thing that decides whether or not they should be individual, but it's impossible to look at it like that, because the enemies have more to them then just their names. As it has been said time and time again, their other aspects clearly demonstrate that they are different enemies. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
:::The Koopas aren't a good example to use when we have literally ''[[List of species|hundreds]]'' of other species that are clearly intended to be separate. One may not follow the pattern, but there are many more that do. What do you think we should follow: the ones that are consistent or the one that's inconsistent? You seem to be getting caught up on the fact that the enemies share the same name, but let me make this explicitly clear: '''the names should not be the sole deciding factor'''. The Gritty Goombas here have parallel characteristics with all of those enemies that I listed alongside many more enemies. If the names were what decided if articles should be merged, the [[Galoomba|Goombas]] from Super Mario World would have been merged to the main Goomba despite being clearly different until they were eventually given the name "Galoomba", or the film adaptations of characters like [[Mario (film character)|Mario]], [[Luigi (film character)|Luigi]], and [[President Koopa]] would have been kept in the main articles despite being so drastically different, or, heck, [[Buzz (character)|Buzz the human golfer]] would be in the same article as [[Buzz (enemy)|Buzz the bee enemy]]. You're looking at one sole aspect of the enemies and acting as if that should be the sole deciding factor in whether or not they should be individual, but it's impossible to look at it like that, because the enemies have more to them then just their names. As it has been said time and time again, their other aspects clearly demonstrate that they are different enemies. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}


Also, SuperYoshiBros, the R enemies actually have different names, not ''only'' a palette swap and stat change. [[User:Binarystep|Binarystep]] ([[User talk:Binarystep|talk]]) 01:01, 23 March 2015 (EDT)
Also, SuperYoshiBros, the R enemies actually have different names, not ''only'' a palette swap and stat change. [[User:Binarystep|Binarystep]] ([[User talk:Binarystep|talk]]) 01:01, 23 March 2015 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)