Editing Talk:Elder Princess Shroob

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
==(First topic)==
{{notforumtalk}}
{{award-winner
|year=first
|#=15
|award=Hardest Boss
|presenter=Xzelion
}}
Why the first sentence looks like it's adding on to something not on the page?{{User:Mr. Guy/sig}}
Why the first sentence looks like it's adding on to something not on the page?{{User:Mr. Guy/sig}}


Line 70: Line 76:


== Move to "Princess Shroob (elder)" (proposal edition) ==
== Move to "Princess Shroob (elder)" (proposal edition) ==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|failed|3-4}}
See above. She is never once called "Elder Princess Shroob" in the game. Only just "Princess Shroob" or at one point "the elder Princess Shroob" (with another line referring to "the younger Princess Shroob"), so treating this as her actual "name" is disingenuous.
See above. She is never once called "Elder Princess Shroob" in the game. Only just "Princess Shroob" or at one point "the elder Princess Shroob" (with another line referring to "the younger Princess Shroob"), so treating this as her actual "name" is disingenuous.
'''Addendum:''' The guide itself called her "the Elder Princess Shroob," thus itself not reading as a name.


'''Proposer''': {{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}}<br>
'''Deadline''': September 21, 2021, 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline''': September 20, 2021, 23:59 GMT


===Support===
===Support===
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Per
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Per
#{{user|LinkTheLefty}} - I'm siding with this option because her name is flat-out "Princess Shroob" when selected in battle, and it doesn't seem to be a space constraint measure either. Maybe if ''Partners in Time'' had its remake, things would be different, but as it stands, she shares the same name as her younger sister in the actual game.
#{{user|Blinker}} - Per all


===Oppose===
===Oppose===
#{{User|Hewer}} It's a name from an official source, though, and [[MarioWiki Talk:Naming#Make an exception to source priority for articles with identical names|this proposal]] happened.
#{{User|Swallow}} Per the proposal Hewer linked.
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} More descriptive names are preferable over identifiers in my opinion and there's precedent for it. Per all.
#{{User|Scrooge200}} Per all.


===Comments===
===Comments===
@Hewer That generally doesn't apply for in-game names, though. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:04, September 11, 2021 (EDT)
:That seems to me like an arbitrary distinction and as far as I can tell wasn't mentioned anywhere in that proposal. This situation seems to be exactly the kind that the proposal described (when a lower-priority source has a more unique name for a subject than a higher-priority source). {{User:Hewer/sig}} 16:45, September 12, 2021 (EDT)
::[[User talk:Niiue#Question about source priority exception proposal|Niiue]] [[User talk:LinkTheLefty/Archive 6#Re: Question about source priority exception proposal|clarified]] that in-game names wouldn't be applicable to the proposal. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 17:29, September 18, 2021 (EDT)
@Waluigi-Time The point is it ''isn't'' a name (I'd also like to see the grammatical context the guide used it in.) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:53, September 12, 2021 (EDT)
:It is a name used by an official source, which is what the aforementioned proposal ties into. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 02:54, September 13, 2021 (EDT)
The closest comparison I can think of is [[Chill Bully]] - that's another guide name we used over an "in-game name," in that case since the "in-game name" was too generic and came from a mission title in a game where mission titles often referred to things generically. The guide name was itself derived from the mission title ([[Chill with the Bully]]), much like how "Elder Princess Shroob" came from Peach's dialogue. I want to see the context of how the name actually appears in the guide before voting on this, but just saying that there ''is'' precedent for this. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 19:23, September 17, 2021 (EDT)
:The Player's Guide refers to her as ''the'' Elder Princess Shroob, so some rewriting is needed regardless (I guess it's too late for a third option where the article title is kept but we use "the elder Princess Shroob" to sort of have it both ways). Chill Bully was moved back via [[Talk:Chill Bully|proposal]], but in retrospect, I agree with it for the reasons outlined there. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 17:29, September 18, 2021 (EDT)
== Final boss ==
Wouldn't it be more necessary to put the elder princess Shroob as the final boss of the game? She is technically the final boss. [[Special:Contributions/177.106.50.20|177.106.50.20]] 10:54, March 31, 2025 (EDT)
:There's no denying Elder Princess Shroob is the final proper boss, although the actual final battle in the game is against [[Shrowser]]. {{User:Nightwicked Bowser/sig}} 11:31, March 31, 2025 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)