Editing Talk:Double Dash!!
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge to [[Rocket Start]]== | ==Merge to [[Rocket Start]]== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
The Double Dash!! is indeed a type of Rocket Start so in this proposal, we're going to find out, should this be merged, or not? The article is short but, we want to merge it. | The Double Dash!! is indeed a type of Rocket Start so in this proposal, we're going to find out, should this be merged, or not? The article is short but, we want to merge it. | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Reddragon19k}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|Reddragon19k}}<br> | ||
'''Extended''': May 20, 2011 23:59 GMT | |||
===Merge to Rocket Start=== | ===Merge to Rocket Start=== | ||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} Per my Proposal | #{{User|Reddragon19k}} Per my Proposal! | ||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per the 19000 Red Dragons. | #{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per the 19000 Red Dragons. | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} A Double Dash is basically the same as a Rocket Start only faster. No point keeping the 2 separate. | #{{User|Tails777}} A Double Dash is basically the same as a Rocket Start only faster. No point keeping the 2 separate. | ||
Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
#{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} Per all. | #{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Master Crash}} The article is relatively small, and is practically the same thing as Rocket Start. | #{{User|Master Crash}} The article is relatively small, and is practically the same thing as Rocket Start. | ||
===Leave un-merged=== | ===Leave un-merged=== | ||
Line 37: | Line 27: | ||
#{{User|Magikrazy51}} Per all. | #{{User|Magikrazy51}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - I haven't played Double Dash before, but from what I see, the Rocket Start and the Double Dash are two totally different concepts; the only thing that is similar is that they both speed you up. I don't think that's enough similarities to claim that these two are the same thing (which, essentially, is what merging claims automatically). Aside from that, I really hope nobody is supporting this because the articles are "stubs". | #{{User|Marioguy1}} - I haven't played Double Dash before, but from what I see, the Rocket Start and the Double Dash are two totally different concepts; the only thing that is similar is that they both speed you up. I don't think that's enough similarities to claim that these two are the same thing (which, essentially, is what merging claims automatically). Aside from that, I really hope nobody is supporting this because the articles are "stubs". | ||
#{{user|Superfiremario}} Per all. | |||
#{{user|theguywithtwohats}} Per all. | #{{user|theguywithtwohats}} Per all. | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 57: | Line 42: | ||
:::::Your use of logic is fallacious. It is perfectly sound logic to assert that one thing is a type of another, as merges are done on the basis of two or more things being alike. Beach Koopas aren't merged with Koopa Troopas because the length of the former makes it impractical to merge it with the latter. If there is something that cannot be explained efficiently within the confines of a given article, that content gets its own article. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}} | :::::Your use of logic is fallacious. It is perfectly sound logic to assert that one thing is a type of another, as merges are done on the basis of two or more things being alike. Beach Koopas aren't merged with Koopa Troopas because the length of the former makes it impractical to merge it with the latter. If there is something that cannot be explained efficiently within the confines of a given article, that content gets its own article. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}} | ||
:::::: But that fails to keep up with consistency and by saying that it is a type of one thing you are implying that it is not the same thing there Reddragon19k presents no argument to support a merge other than that the two are a type of each other and im saying tha if you want to play the consistency game which everybody likes to claim they play you would have to merge every other sub-species into the main article other wise you create an exception which isn't based on previous standards presented in this proposal {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | :::::: But that fails to keep up with consistency and by saying that it is a type of one thing you are implying that it is not the same thing there Reddragon19k presents no argument to support a merge other than that the two are a type of each other and im saying tha if you want to play the consistency game which everybody likes to claim they play you would have to merge every other sub-species into the main article other wise you create an exception which isn't based on previous standards presented in this proposal {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | ||