Editing Talk:Dolly
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Create page for Peach Doll (the one from Super Mario RPG) == | == Create page for Peach Doll (the one from Super Mario RPG) == | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
The [[Mario doll]] and [[Bowser doll]] from ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|Super Mario RPG]]'' have their own articles. I see no reason for the [[Peach Doll]] from the same game to not have its own article, too. Additionally, this doll and [[Dolly]] are clearly different dolls with different owners so I will not be including a support option for merging the two dolls. | The [[Mario doll]] and [[Bowser doll]] from ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|Super Mario RPG]]'' have their own articles. I see no reason for the [[Peach Doll]] from the same game to not have its own article, too. Additionally, this doll and [[Dolly]] are clearly different dolls with different owners so I will not be including a support option for merging the two dolls. | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User|Hewer}} Sure. | #{{User|Hewer}} Sure. | ||
#{{User|Shoey}} Per. | #{{User|Shoey}} Per. | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
#{{User|Shadow2}} I say we nuke the Bowser doll page instead. | #{{User|Shadow2}} I say we nuke the Bowser doll page instead. | ||
Line 32: | Line 29: | ||
{{@|Hewer}} I suppose you're correct. That said, I believe [[Shadow2|Shadow2's]] reasoning is rather insensible and lacks merit. The argument that they believe the [[Bowser doll]] article should be deleted and doesn't explain why they think so being used as "evidence" that an article for the [[Peach Doll]] from ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|Super Mario RPG]]'' shouldn't be created is a very weak and flimsy reason to oppose.--{{User:Pizza Master/sig}} 21:31, September 23, 2024 (EDT) | {{@|Hewer}} I suppose you're correct. That said, I believe [[Shadow2|Shadow2's]] reasoning is rather insensible and lacks merit. The argument that they believe the [[Bowser doll]] article should be deleted and doesn't explain why they think so being used as "evidence" that an article for the [[Peach Doll]] from ''[[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|Super Mario RPG]]'' shouldn't be created is a very weak and flimsy reason to oppose.--{{User:Pizza Master/sig}} 21:31, September 23, 2024 (EDT) | ||
{{@|Mario jc}}, {{@|Nightwicked Bowser}}, {{@|Porplemontage}}, {{@|RHG1951}}, {{@|Shokora}}, ↑ shows the reasoning for why I believe [[Shadow2|Shadow2's]] vote should be removed from this proposal. Feel free to disagree and let the vote stay up if you so choose.--{{User:Pizza Master/sig}} 13:59, September 26, 2024 (EDT) | |||
:I think it's kinda valid. It's to say that they don't find the Peach doll important enough to deserve its own article, and in fact don't even find the Bowser doll important enough to deserve one either, as it has a similar level of importance to the plot of ''Super Mario RPG''. I believe this is the case because of the use of "instead" in their oppose vote; otherwise, the reasoning would sound a bit too irrelevant to the Peach doll case. {{User:Arend/sig}} 07:15, September 29, 2024 (EDT) | :I think it's kinda valid. It's to say that they don't find the Peach doll important enough to deserve its own article, and in fact don't even find the Bowser doll important enough to deserve one either, as it has a similar level of importance to the plot of ''Super Mario RPG''. I believe this is the case because of the use of "instead" in their oppose vote; otherwise, the reasoning would sound a bit too irrelevant to the Peach doll case. {{User:Arend/sig}} 07:15, September 29, 2024 (EDT) | ||