Editing Talk:Diddy Kong Pilot (2003)
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Allow this game more coverage == | == Allow this game more coverage == | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
This game is in a weird position. It was ''technically'' never released as-is for the system it was made for... but was then released with a different set of characters and other scattered graphic/interface/sound changes while keeping virtually everything else intact. Plus, the fact that it was leaked by a Rare employee means that it actually did have an "official" release... even if it's not in the intended manner nor one Nintendo themselves | This game is in a weird position. It was ''technically'' never released as-is for the system it was made for... but was then released with a different set of characters and other scattered graphic/interface/sound changes while keeping virtually everything else intact. Plus, the fact that it was leaked by a Rare employee means that it actually did have an "official" release... even if it's not in the intended manner nor one Nintendo themselves won't acknowledge. Plus, unlike most vaporware articles (such as the 2001 DKP, which is practically an alpha build), this is, for all intents and purposes, a complete game: the only thing it lacks is polish and a proper options menu - and because of ''Banjo-Pilot'', it's technically not "vaporware" anyway. | ||
Normally, we don't make articles for subjects from unreleased games or exclusively unused content from released games, but again, this game is in such a weird position I'd like to make an exception, namely for the race tracks. There's so much information on them that the current format prevents us from documenting in full (general layout, screenshots, letter positions, balloon positions, coin positions, full differences in B-P), but if we can make articles for them, then that won't be an issue. The naming priority for the articles would be the names used in DKP while playing as the Kongs, since the Krems use reversed versions of those courses with different names. | Normally, we don't make articles for subjects from unreleased games or exclusively unused content from released games, but again, this game is in such a weird position I'd like to make an exception, namely for the race tracks. There's so much information on them that the current format prevents us from documenting in full (general layout, screenshots, letter positions, balloon positions, coin positions, full differences in B-P), but if we can make articles for them, then that won't be an issue. The naming priority for the articles would be the names used in DKP while playing as the Kongs, since the Krems use reversed versions of those courses with different names. | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
#{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Per | #{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - Per | ||
#{{User|Axis}} Per proposal. | #{{User|Axis}} Per proposal. | ||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Almost everything that can be said about the game is already covered on the base page. As for courses, to acknowledge this game's pre-release status and prevent overflow into ''Banjo-Pilot'', I suggest a List of courses in ''Diddy Kong Pilot'' (2003) page to cover everything instead. | #{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Almost everything that can be said about the game is already covered on the base page. As for courses, to acknowledge this game's pre-release status and prevent overflow into ''Banjo-Pilot'', I suggest a List of courses in ''Diddy Kong Pilot'' (2003) page to cover everything instead. | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Line 33: | Line 26: | ||
: Quick question, does this even ''need'' a proposal? It's fully playable and there's nothing really stopping us from doing so. [[User:PrincessPeachFan|PrincessPeachFan]] ([[User talk:PrincessPeachFan|talk]]) 08:26, July 21, 2024 (EDT) | : Quick question, does this even ''need'' a proposal? It's fully playable and there's nothing really stopping us from doing so. [[User:PrincessPeachFan|PrincessPeachFan]] ([[User talk:PrincessPeachFan|talk]]) 08:26, July 21, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::As mentioned in the proposal, we don't normally make articles for subjects from unreleased/cancelled games. The proposal is aiming to make an exception here as it's a weird enough edge case to warrant scrutiny. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 08:59, July 21, 2024 (EDT) | ::As mentioned in the proposal, we don't normally make articles for subjects from unreleased/cancelled games. The proposal is aiming to make an exception here as it's a weird enough edge case to warrant scrutiny. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 08:59, July 21, 2024 (EDT) | ||