Editing Talk:Demon
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Delete Demon. == | == Delete Demon. == | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
Is this really necessary? There's a category. | Is this really necessary? There's a category. | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
===Delete=== | ===Delete=== | ||
#{{User|Joseph}} | #{{User|Joseph}} Per what I said above. | ||
#{{User|Mario}} My question: are there multiple things called "Demon" from the games? Then yes, we need a disambiguation page. But "demon" receiving a disambiguation page is like having "[[Plumber]]" receiving such a page. Disambiguation pages are supposed to help people search for the right name, not be a page that lumps all shared entities into one spot. | #{{User|Mario}} My question: are there multiple things called "Demon" from the games? Then yes, we need a disambiguation page. But "demon" receiving a disambiguation page is like having "[[Plumber]]" receiving such a page. Disambiguation pages are supposed to help people search for the right name, not be a page that lumps all shared entities into one spot. | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} There's ''maybe'' the [[Resident Demon]] and ''maybe'' the [[Black Chest Demon]] that are worth keeping if we were to trim it, but I really don't think those two alone are really worth keeping this. | #{{User|Time Turner}} There's ''maybe'' the [[Resident Demon]] and ''maybe'' the [[Black Chest Demon]] that are worth keeping if we were to trim it, but I really don't think those two alone are really worth keeping this. | ||
Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
#{{User|Tsunami}} Per what there's at the bottom of the page. While a dsambig is for something that have the same title (or similar, that's why I included [[Mini-Mario]] in [[Mini Mario (disambiguation)|Mini Mario disambig]]), the entries in this page doesn't even share a single letter. | #{{User|Tsunami}} Per what there's at the bottom of the page. While a dsambig is for something that have the same title (or similar, that's why I included [[Mini-Mario]] in [[Mini Mario (disambiguation)|Mini Mario disambig]]), the entries in this page doesn't even share a single letter. | ||
#{{User|'Shroom64}} Though I originally opposed (because of the small clarification at the top of the section) I see enough reason from others to move my vote over here. (Though I see no problem with "Loser" :P) | #{{User|'Shroom64}} Though I originally opposed (because of the small clarification at the top of the section) I see enough reason from others to move my vote over here. (Though I see no problem with "Loser" :P) | ||
===Keep=== | ===Keep=== | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} So what? We have a category for Dogs and '''yet''' it has a page. | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} So what? We have a category for Dogs and '''yet''' it has a page. | ||
#{{User|Vommack}} Having a disambig and a category with same/similar names isn't the same thing. They have two seperate functions, and having one doesn't prevent from having the other. That said, most of the things on here are demons, ''but aren't named demon.'' That's the function of a category. There are a few that do have demon in the name, so keep those. Tl;dr: Trim entries, but don't delete. | #{{User|Vommack}} Having a disambig and a category with same/similar names isn't the same thing. They have two seperate functions, and having one doesn't prevent from having the other. That said, most of the things on here are demons, ''but aren't named demon.'' That's the function of a category. There are a few that do have demon in the name, so keep those. Tl;dr: Trim entries, but don't delete. | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 40: | Line 36: | ||
Shadow Queen IS a demon. The other stated not. I agrre we should delete this{{User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig}} | Shadow Queen IS a demon. The other stated not. I agrre we should delete this{{User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig}} | ||
::"''This is a disambiguation page — a list of '''pages that otherwise might share the same title.'''''" These pages do not share the same titles at all: this kind of disambig page misuse happens ''all the time''... Now, one ''can'' make a case for making a general "Demon" article, like Dog or [[Dragon]] to talk about demons like [[ | ::"''This is a disambiguation page — a list of '''pages that otherwise might share the same title.'''''" These pages do not share the same titles at all: this kind of disambig page misuse happens ''all the time''... Now, one ''can'' make a case for making a general "Demon" article, like Dog or [[Dragon]] to talk about demons like [[Red]], [[Abigor]] and [[Akuman]], which don't have specific species, and are just "generic" demons, but as it is, the disambig page approach is no good. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 19:12, 5 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
See, now this is making enough sense. The original reason of "There's a category too" is why I opposed originally. | See, now this is making enough sense. The original reason of "There's a category too" is why I opposed originally. | ||
Line 50: | Line 46: | ||
:You should include more in your summary for your proposals, et cetera. As you can see, everyone else is supporting for a different reason than the existence of the category. {{User:'Shroom64/sig}} | :You should include more in your summary for your proposals, et cetera. As you can see, everyone else is supporting for a different reason than the existence of the category. {{User:'Shroom64/sig}} | ||
::Yeah, the reason you're winning is that other voters have provided more convincing reasons the article should go. {{User:Mario/sig}} 23:36, 6 September 2014 (EDT) | ::Yeah, the reason you're winning is that other voters have provided more convincing reasons the article should go. {{User:Mario/sig}} 23:36, 6 September 2014 (EDT) | ||