Editing Talk:Dancing Spear Guy
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
::::::::I'm not basing my arguments on their English name, but, rather their Japanese name. According to Twentytwofiftyseven, their names are exactly the same in Japanese. "Spearspear Dancer", as it will. I also didn't mean to imply that real-world evolution was in any way a canonical argument. I was using logic. Logically speaking, as well as canon names, clearly point out that a "Dancing" Spear Guy is a much different thing compared to a "Dark" Goomba. An action does not automatically denote one thing as an entirely different other thing. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 13:33, 3 December 2009 (EST) | ::::::::I'm not basing my arguments on their English name, but, rather their Japanese name. According to Twentytwofiftyseven, their names are exactly the same in Japanese. "Spearspear Dancer", as it will. I also didn't mean to imply that real-world evolution was in any way a canonical argument. I was using logic. Logically speaking, as well as canon names, clearly point out that a "Dancing" Spear Guy is a much different thing compared to a "Dark" Goomba. An action does not automatically denote one thing as an entirely different other thing. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 13:33, 3 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:::::::::"Spearspear Dancer" is in no way similar to "Spear Guy". It's not a dancing Spear Guy, it's a Spearspear.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 13:39, 3 December 2009 (EST) | :::::::::"Spearspear Dancer" is in no way similar to "Spear Guy". It's not a dancing Spear Guy, it's a Spearspear.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 13:39, 3 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::::::::::How is "Spearspear Dancer" unlike "Spear ho"? (I'm unsure what exactly "ho" means, but I don't think it translates to "Guy". | ::::::::::How is "Spearspear Dancer" unlike "Spear ho"? (I'm unsure what exactly "ho" means, but I don't think it translates to "Guy". | ||
:::::::::::"hou" is simply the second half of heihou, the name of the Shy Guys. I used "Guy" here to make it clear that "yari hou" (yari + second half of "heihou") amounts to about the same thing as "Spear Guy" (spear + second half of "Shy Guy"). And how is Spearspear Dancer anything LIKE Spearhou? It would have to be Spearhou Dancer if the intention was for it to be the same as a Spearhou except dancing. Since it's Spearspear Dancer, that means it's not a Spearhou, simple as that.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 13:51, 3 December 2009 (EST) | :::::::::::"hou" is simply the second half of heihou, the name of the Shy Guys. I used "Guy" here to make it clear that "yari hou" (yari + second half of "heihou") amounts to about the same thing as "Spear Guy" (spear + second half of "Shy Guy"). And how is Spearspear Dancer anything LIKE Spearhou? It would have to be Spearhou Dancer if the intention was for it to be the same as a Spearhou except dancing. Since it's Spearspear Dancer, that means it's not a Spearhou, simple as that.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 13:51, 3 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::::::::::::As far as I can tell, the "ho" means "garment", referring to Shy Guy's robes... Spearspear Dancer is like Spearhou, because, quite obviously, they both have the word "spear" in them. Can you not see that? Are you just ignoring it? I think the spear part is far more important than the ho part, which was removed as redundant. Ho, being a title and a passive noun, would do little use in a new word that already has a noun "Spear" and a verb "dancer". The ho was removed because it was redundant, and the second spear added to suggest the enemy was a variation of, or expansion, of the previous "spear" enemy. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 13:54, 3 December 2009 (EST) | ::::::::::::As far as I can tell, the "ho" means "garment", referring to Shy Guy's robes... Spearspear Dancer is like Spearhou, because, quite obviously, they both have the word "spear" in them. Can you not see that? Are you just ignoring it? I think the spear part is far more important than the ho part, which was removed as redundant. Ho, being a title and a passive noun, would do little use in a new word that already has a noun "Spear" and a verb "dancer". The ho was removed because it was redundant, and the second spear added to suggest the enemy was a variation of, or expansion, of the previous "spear" enemy. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 13:54, 3 December 2009 (EST) |