Editing Talk:Comet Luma
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
==Move to Lumacomète== | ==Move to Lumacomète== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
I get it. "Why are you, of all people, suggesting this nonsense?" The above proposal was made way before [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/71#A reconsidering of "derived names"|this one]], so I think it's only fair we reconsider this once again. Here's a fact that might not be liked, but it's still a fact nonetheless: "Lumacomète" is more official than "Comet Luma" as things currently stand. Maybe there wasn't much of a thought to it ending up in an English book, but at the end of the day, it came from an official in-game source to begin with. Sure, "Comet Luma" might be the name they give it later if there's another chance, why not; however, this is asking for us to chase citogenesis forever. "[[Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)|Did]] [[Fire Nipper Plant|they]] [[Barrel Bomb|copy]] <s>[[Croaka Cola|fans]]</s>?" I don't know, but I believe it'd be better to do some more preventative actions now so we don't have to ask that question later. The current title is a derived fan-name, and this proposal will help determine if the new derived-name system will be a last resort - yes, below ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia''. If this passes, Lumacomète will be marked as <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki> and treated as any other name in that category until the day ever comes where we can, without worry, call it Comet Luma (or whatever NoA comes up with). | I get it. "Why are you, of all people, suggesting this nonsense?" The above proposal was made way before [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/71#A reconsidering of "derived names"|this one]], so I think it's only fair we reconsider this once again. Here's a fact that might not be liked, but it's still a fact nonetheless: "Lumacomète" is more official than "Comet Luma" as things currently stand. Maybe there wasn't much of a thought to it ending up in an English book, but at the end of the day, it came from an official in-game source to begin with. Sure, "Comet Luma" might be the name they give it later if there's another chance, why not; however, this is asking for us to chase citogenesis forever. "[[Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)|Did]] [[Fire Nipper Plant|they]] [[Barrel Bomb|copy]] <s>[[Croaka Cola|fans]]</s>?" I don't know, but I believe it'd be better to do some more preventative actions now so we don't have to ask that question later. The current title is a derived fan-name, and this proposal will help determine if the new derived-name system will be a last resort - yes, below ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia''. If this passes, Lumacomète will be marked as <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki> and treated as any other name in that category until the day ever comes where we can, without worry, call it Comet Luma (or whatever NoA comes up with). | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|LinkTheLefty}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|LinkTheLefty}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': | '''Deadline''': January 19, 2025, 23:59 GMT | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} deux avis valent mieux qu'un. | #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} deux avis valent mieux qu'un. | ||
#{{User|Hewer}} I honestly always thought its reasoning for being excluded from [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|this proposal]] was a bit shaky, considering that "Comet Tico" (from which the current title is derived) is Japanese while "Lumacomète" is (according to Encyclopedia) English. And in the words of the new [[Template:Derivation|derived name template]], "If an official English name is found that differs from the current name, then the article should be moved to the new title." Per proposal. | #{{User|Hewer}} I honestly always thought its reasoning for being excluded from [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|this proposal]] was a bit shaky, considering that "Comet Tico" (from which the current title is derived) is Japanese while "Lumacomète" is (according to Encyclopedia) English. And in the words of the new [[Template:Derivation|derived name template]], "If an official English name is found that differs from the current name, then the article should be moved to the new title." Per proposal. | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
Line 102: | Line 100: | ||
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. | #{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|PrincessPeachFan}} Shall we move all of the other derived names back too? | #{{User|PrincessPeachFan}} Shall we move all of the other derived names back too? | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
FYI for anyone bringing up [[MarioWiki:Naming#Acceptable sources for naming|policy priority]]: The only reason development names are higher than ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia'' names is precisely because of [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|my partial-unban proposal]] and I figured it was an acceptable spot so that we can safely leave this as Comet Tico. However, another proposal added an even lower priority than the ''Encyclopedia'', so that was already outdated before the derived-names proposal. Realistically, only dev data, site filenames, and foreign names make sense to use as derived names. Why not just make a proposal that cuts the middleman and swaps <nowiki>{{dev data}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki>? Firstly, I'd have to review all the potential consequences of that, and secondly, it's to establish that, if you use a derived name, it should be low priority anyway. (Also, as a transliteration, it doesn't truly apply.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 12:21, January 5, 2025 (EST) | FYI for anyone bringing up [[MarioWiki:Naming#Acceptable sources for naming|policy priority]]: The only reason development names are higher than ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia'' names is precisely because of [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|my partial-unban proposal]] and I figured it was an acceptable spot so that we can safely leave this as Comet Tico. However, another proposal added an even lower priority than the ''Encyclopedia'', so that was already outdated before the derived-names proposal. Realistically, only dev data, site filenames, and foreign names make sense to use as derived names. Why not just make a proposal that cuts the middleman and swaps <nowiki>{{dev data}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki>? Firstly, I'd have to review all the potential consequences of that, and secondly, it's to establish that, if you use a derived name, it should be low priority anyway. (Also, as a transliteration, it doesn't truly apply.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 12:21, January 5, 2025 (EST) | ||
Line 118: | Line 111: | ||
:The previous name of this article was Comet Tico, not Lumacomète. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 13:39, January 6, 2025 (EST) | :The previous name of this article was Comet Tico, not Lumacomète. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 13:39, January 6, 2025 (EST) | ||
::I'm personally of the view that the romanization of Japanese names (for the reasons outlined of my vote) should be prioritized over internal file designations. The former is the rendering of a name intended for the playerbase, and is part of how the piece is to be sincerely understood. Internal filenames, while good to have in lieu of anything else, are not. A proposal aimed to amend this is kinda moot with the derived names proposal that had passed recently, but I still believe this to be a more accurate and sincere way to present the contents of these games. "Comet Tico" went under the radar for me when I worked on the ''Super Mario Galaxy'' page because I uncritically thought it was a romanization, not as a data-derived name. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 15:17, January 6, 2025 (EST) | ::I'm personally of the view that the romanization of Japanese names (for the reasons outlined of my vote) should be prioritized over internal file designations. The former is the rendering of a name intended for the playerbase, and is part of how the piece is to be sincerely understood. Internal filenames, while good to have in lieu of anything else, are not. A proposal aimed to amend this is kinda moot with the derived names proposal that had passed recently, but I still believe this to be a more accurate and sincere way to present the contents of these games. "Comet Tico" went under the radar for me when I worked on the ''Super Mario Galaxy'' page because I uncritically thought it was a romanization, not as a data-derived name. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 15:17, January 6, 2025 (EST) | ||
:{{@|PrincessPeachFan}} if this proposal does not pass, the status quo is to be retained, which would be the article title "Comet Luma." One would have to repeal the recent derived names proposal if they wanted to move names back to things like "Fire Gabon," but that saw a lot of support, and I personally have felt more comfortable with it with the integration of the <nowiki>{{derived}}</nowiki> template alongside mentioning of these names on other articles, personally. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 15:22, January 6, 2025 (EST) | :{{@|PrincessPeachFan}} if this proposal does not pass, the status quo is to be retained, which would be the article title "Comet Luma." One would have to repeal the recent derived names proposal if they wanted to move names back to things like "Fire Gabon," but that saw a lot of support, and I personally have felt more comfortable with it with the integration of the <nowiki>{{derived}}</nowiki> template alongside mentioning of these names on other articles, personally. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 15:22, January 6, 2025 (EST) |