Editing Talk:Comet Luma
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
==Move to Lumacomète== | ==Move to Lumacomète== | ||
{{TPP | {{TPP}} | ||
I get it. "Why are you, of all people, suggesting this nonsense?" The above proposal was made way before [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/71#A reconsidering of "derived names"|this one]], so I think it's only fair we reconsider this once again. Here's a fact that might not be liked, but it's still a fact nonetheless: "Lumacomète" is more official than "Comet Luma" as things currently stand. Maybe there wasn't much of a thought to it ending up in an English book, but at the end of the day, it came from an official in-game source to begin with. Sure, "Comet Luma" might be the name they give it later if there's another chance, why not; however, this is asking for us to chase citogenesis forever. "[[Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)|Did]] [[Fire Nipper Plant|they]] [[Barrel Bomb|copy]] <s>[[Croaka Cola|fans]]</s>?" I don't know, but I believe it'd be better to do some more preventative actions now so we don't have to ask that question later. The current title is a derived fan-name, and this proposal will help determine if the new derived-name system will be a last resort - yes, below ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia''. If this passes, Lumacomète will be marked as <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki> and treated as any other name in that category until the day ever comes where we can, without worry, call it Comet Luma (or whatever NoA comes up with). | I get it. "Why are you, of all people, suggesting this nonsense?" The above proposal was made way before [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/71#A reconsidering of "derived names"|this one]], so I think it's only fair we reconsider this once again. Here's a fact that might not be liked, but it's still a fact nonetheless: "Lumacomète" is more official than "Comet Luma" as things currently stand. Maybe there wasn't much of a thought to it ending up in an English book, but at the end of the day, it came from an official in-game source to begin with. Sure, "Comet Luma" might be the name they give it later if there's another chance, why not; however, this is asking for us to chase citogenesis forever. "[[Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)|Did]] [[Fire Nipper Plant|they]] [[Barrel Bomb|copy]] <s>[[Croaka Cola|fans]]</s>?" I don't know, but I believe it'd be better to do some more preventative actions now so we don't have to ask that question later. The current title is a derived fan-name, and this proposal will help determine if the new derived-name system will be a last resort - yes, below ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia''. If this passes, Lumacomète will be marked as <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki> and treated as any other name in that category until the day ever comes where we can, without worry, call it Comet Luma (or whatever NoA comes up with). | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} deux avis valent mieux qu'un. | #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} deux avis valent mieux qu'un. | ||
#{{User|Hewer}} I honestly always thought its reasoning for being excluded from [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|this proposal]] was a bit shaky, considering that "Comet Tico" (from which the current title is derived) is Japanese while "Lumacomète" is (according to Encyclopedia) English. And in the words of the new [[Template:Derivation|derived name template]], "If an official English name is found that differs from the current name, then the article should be moved to the new title." Per proposal. | #{{User|Hewer}} I honestly always thought its reasoning for being excluded from [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|this proposal]] was a bit shaky, considering that "Comet Tico" (from which the current title is derived) is Japanese while "Lumacomète" is (according to Encyclopedia) English. And in the words of the new [[Template:Derivation|derived name template]], "If an official English name is found that differs from the current name, then the article should be moved to the new title." Per proposal. | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
#{{User|Nintendo101}} I would prefer seeing this character's | #{{User|Nintendo101}} I would prefer seeing this character's named moved to "Comet Chiko" before the French name. When an English name is not available, I believe a character created and designed in Japan, in a Japanese work by creators from Japan, is better represented by a Romanization of its Japanese name. It is not a French character. | ||
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Per Nintendo101. | #{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Per Nintendo101. | ||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Lumacomète is only an "English name" because of what we know for a fact to be an uncritical mistake while writing the Encyclopedia, let's not throw discretion out the window here. Per N101. | #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Lumacomète is only an "English name" because of what we know for a fact to be an uncritical mistake while writing the Encyclopedia, let's not throw discretion out the window here. Per N101. | ||
Line 100: | Line 99: | ||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per all. | #{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. | #{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 111: | Line 107: | ||
@Nintendo101: The point of the proposal is that an English name ''is'' available, because Lumacomète's usage in the English version of the encyclopedia makes it an official English name. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 12:59, January 5, 2025 (EST) | @Nintendo101: The point of the proposal is that an English name ''is'' available, because Lumacomète's usage in the English version of the encyclopedia makes it an official English name. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 12:59, January 5, 2025 (EST) | ||
:I understand the argument. I don't agree with it. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 13:01, January 5, 2025 (EST) | :I understand the argument. I don't agree with it. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 13:01, January 5, 2025 (EST) | ||