Editing Talk:Comet Luma
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
FYI for anyone bringing up [[MarioWiki:Naming#Acceptable sources for naming|policy priority]]: The only reason development names are higher than ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia'' names is precisely because of [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|my partial-unban proposal]] and I figured it was an acceptable spot so that we can safely leave this as Comet Tico. However, another proposal added an even lower priority than the ''Encyclopedia'', so that was already outdated before the derived-names proposal. Realistically, only dev data, site filenames, and foreign names make sense to use as derived names. Why not just make a proposal that cuts the middleman and swaps <nowiki>{{dev data}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki>? Firstly, I'd have to review all the potential consequences of that, and secondly, it's to establish that, if you use a derived name, it should be low priority anyway. (Also, as a transliteration, it doesn't truly apply.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 12:21, January 5, 2025 (EST) | FYI for anyone bringing up [[MarioWiki:Naming#Acceptable sources for naming|policy priority]]: The only reason development names are higher than ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia'' names is precisely because of [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|my partial-unban proposal]] and I figured it was an acceptable spot so that we can safely leave this as Comet Tico. However, another proposal added an even lower priority than the ''Encyclopedia'', so that was already outdated before the derived-names proposal. Realistically, only dev data, site filenames, and foreign names make sense to use as derived names. Why not just make a proposal that cuts the middleman and swaps <nowiki>{{dev data}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{encyclopedia}}</nowiki>? Firstly, I'd have to review all the potential consequences of that, and secondly, it's to establish that, if you use a derived name, it should be low priority anyway. (Also, as a transliteration, it doesn't truly apply.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 12:21, January 5, 2025 (EST) | ||
Somewhat relevant: regardless of this proposal's outcome, I feel like we should acknowledge Encyclopedia names on pages even if they aren't being used as the title, since it's information that makes sense to document (and is already listed on the [[Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia]] page itself), like how the [[Polterpiranha]] article acknowledges the "Ghost" name despite not using it as the title, and the [[Nipper Dandelion]] article actually explains the situation where we aren't sure if they took the name from the wiki. In other words, if this proposal fails, I think the article should still say something like "'''Comet Luma''', known as '''Lumacomète''' in the ''[[Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia]]'' | Somewhat relevant: regardless of this proposal's outcome, I feel like we should acknowledge Encyclopedia names on pages even if they aren't being used as the title, since it's information that makes sense to document (and is already listed on the [[Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia]] page itself), like how the [[Polterpiranha]] article acknowledges the "Ghost" name despite not using it as the title, and the [[Nipper Dandelion]] article actually explains the situation where we aren't sure if they took the name from the wiki. In other words, if this proposal fails, I think the article should still say something like "'''Comet Luma''', known as '''Lumacomète''' in the ''[[Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia]]''[citation], is a unique [[Luma]] found in..." etc. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 12:59, January 5, 2025 (EST) | ||
@Nintendo101: The point of the proposal is that an English name ''is'' available, because Lumacomète's usage in the English version of the encyclopedia makes it an official English name. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 12:59, January 5, 2025 (EST) | @Nintendo101: The point of the proposal is that an English name ''is'' available, because Lumacomète's usage in the English version of the encyclopedia makes it an official English name. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 12:59, January 5, 2025 (EST) |