| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
| |
|
| This gets its own page and not on the [[List of implied characters]]... why? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:20, 15 July 2018 (EDT) | | This gets its own page and not on the [[List of implied characters]]... why? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:20, 15 July 2018 (EDT) |
| :So do Scarlette and the Croacus dynasty (the latter of which at least have pictures). Probably due to his importance in a secondary character's little story arc, but I really don't know. I think the reason has waned over time. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:23, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::If the Chestnut King warrants his own article, so do Minister Crepe and Princess Eclair. Otherwise this should just be merged. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:02, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::The reasoning given in the edit summary of [[List of implied characters]] states that the reasoning for the split was "There's enough interesting information here, plus he's referenced multiple times in Luigi's story." Since this has a similar amount of content to the section for Princess Eclair, and there are a few larger sections ([[List of implied characters#Pixl Queen|Pixl Queen]], for example), this seems like something that could probably be merged. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 17:17, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::I'm not seeing a good reason to keep this. Him being only mentioned in Luigi's arc, no matter how important he is in that arc, doesn't give him enough legitimacy to warrant an article of his own. He's never seen and has no bearing on the main story of ''The Thousand-Year Door''. Any categories related to him can just be on his redirect. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:16, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| I support merging, but to the [[Goomba King]] page. The translations in other languages and TTYD having other instances of the English translators mangling references to the original ''Paper Mario'' ("Mushville" = Toad Town, "Goomstar Temple" = Crystal Palace) makes it blatantly obvious to me it's supposed to be that character. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 19:06, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :That makes sense to me. We can just add a {{tem|redirect}} to the top. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 19:48, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::Redirect to what exactly? The info would go on that page alone. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:53, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::Could be like {{redirect|Chestnut King|the implied character from [[Luigi]]'s story in [[Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door]]|[[List of implied characters#Chestnut King]]}}
| |
| :::on Goomboss's page. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 10:44, 16 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Except there'd be no point....'cause they're the same person. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:48, 16 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::...Oh. Misunderstood something, then ^^; I'm for that, too, I suppose :P {{User:Alex95/sig}} 15:04, 16 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::I ''vehemently'' oppose merging this with Goomba King/[[Goomboss]]. Even if the Chestnut King's Japanese name is intended as a reference to the Goomba King, it is highly unlikely they are the same character, mainly because that ''makes no sense''. The Goomba King was a Goomba who begged Bowser to turn him into a king with the [[Star Rod]]. The Chestnut King is the lover of a princess from a completely different kingdom who was turned into a monster against his will by an evil minister. There is nothing "blatantly obvious" about this (what's "blatantly obvious" is that the people responsible for ''[[Donkey Kong Land]]'''s manual seriously botched the names of [[Balloon Barrage]] and [[Construction Site Fight]], yet we aren't doing anything about that); there is no connection between the two besides the name, so if we merge these, we might as well merge ''PM'' [[Lily (Paper Mario)|Lily]] with ''SPM'' [[Lily (Super Paper Mario)|Lily]]. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:15, 16 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::I mean, dialogue from Luigi's partner and some of the text itself (ex: ''Knowing that [Luigi]'s older, though less talented, brother was out on a no-doubt inconsequential errand''") hints the Super Luigi books are ''heavily'' embellished and distorted, if not outright nonsense. That the text doesn't acknowledge in any way the "Chestnut King" is a character that appeared before is pretty weird, but it can be chalked-up to in-universe sheanigans and stranger things have happened in the ''Mario'' series. <br> <br> It's like: If the Treehouse guy who handed the translation didn't mangle the reference/make an arbitrary judgement call to not translate the name of the character and just called the character "King Goomba" '''like every other languages the game was written in''', I doubt we'd get people vehemently arguing the King Goomba in ''The Thousand Year Door'' is a separate character that should be split into his own page (or spot on a list). --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 22:59, 16 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::Either way, Goomboss's origins ''already'' conflict between PM and SM64DS, as in the latter, he seems to be a magically merged bunch of Goombas akin to Megasparkle Goomba, as he explodes into a cloud of them when defeated, something no other boss in the game does anything comparable to. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 02:18, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::Luigi never mentions anything about the Chestnut King being a past foe of Mario's or a Goomba at all, so we have nothing to go on beyond the shared names in other languages. Everything we know about Luigi's tale comes from him, his partners, and the books, so embellished or not, they're all we've got. So the fact that it's not acknowledged that the Chestnut King is a character that appeared before is very likely because he ''isn't''. The name "Chestnut King" was likely just chosen to go with the food theme the Waffle Kingdom has, even if the original Japanese text intentionally made it double as a throwaway reference to the first game despite the shared name making no sense in context. <br> <br> As for the Goomba King being different in ''SM64DS'', that's not really relevant as that's from a different game series; continuity between different ''Mario'' sub-series is shaky at best. We're talking about two characters from the ''same series''. Even if you were to use [[Merlon]] and his clan as examples, the different incarnations of those characters have distinct similarities in appearance and role. The Goomba King and Chestnut King do not. There is no indication that the Chestnut King is a servant of Bowser, is or was ever a Goomba, or has ever encountered Mario. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 03:22, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::How about how Chet Rippo went from being a lying fat platypus alien vampire to an honest washtub Merlon bootleg? That's pretty different.... [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 03:36, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::Completely different appearance, yes, but at least his role is identical. If it wasn't, they'd have nothing in common and that would be grounds for a split. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 03:45, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::::OK then, well how about instead, we split off Luigi from this story, since he was a bride and grass/"Earth Spirit" in it, neither of which are his usual role? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 03:58, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :OK, now it just sounds like you're misinterpreting my comments on purpose. You are well aware that the scenario you just presented is ridiculous, but more importantly, it does nothing to rebut my original point: a shared name, even in multiple languages, does not automatically make the Goomba King and Chestnut King the same being, especially with no other connections between the two. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 04:20, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| So...proposal time? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 10:18, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::@7 I'm saying your comments are making subjective exceptions, which is not a good thing. @Alex if ya want, I suppose. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:21, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::Going to put it on [[Talk:List of implied characters]] since this could also involve [[Scarlette]]. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:34, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
