Editing Talk:Cheep Cheep

==(First topic)==
Does Cheep Cheep occasionally appear in the Mario Party series?{{User:Fg/sig}}

Probably. -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]]
:[[Cheep Cheep Sweep|Yes]]. --{{User:Yoshi626/sig}} 20:57, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Then how come there's no info about the mario party series in this article?{{User:Fg/sig}}
:Because nobody's added it in yet. --{{User:Yoshi626/sig}} 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::And a lot of other ones which I'm not going to tell fg because I'll have to rewrite the articles like I did with [[Sphere Factor]] and [[Monty's Revenge]]. {{User:YoshiFan/sig}}

Usually I just mentioned that something appears in throughout the Mario Party series and I may mention a certain game; and if theres something notable about its appearance in said Mario Party game(s), I just jot it down, like if its a partner in Deul Mode or if it has a board themed after it. [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]]

I *know* that they're in 4 and 7. They're mostly in minigames, but sometimes are just part of a background, though they do occasionally have a part in boards. Particularly in 7, where they'll knock a player back to start on the Italy board if they land on the leaning tower of Piza space (which tips and knocks them into the canals, where cheep-cheeps will bop them back to start). [[User:Xanofar|Xanofar]] 14:30, 5 January 2009 (EST)

== Dialouge ==

I think I figured out why Cheep Cheeps couldn't talk before. Because none of the enemies in early Mario games talked. You might as well say the talking Koopas are a sub-species.-Pal101

==Super Mario RPG==
Didn't they appear in [[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]]?{{User:Fg/sig}}
:They were called [[Mr. Kipper]] there. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:42, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
::Actually, they were called [[Goby]]. Mr. Kippers are cousins (Pichipichi). [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] 15:46, 12 November 2008 (EST)

== Fixing ==

I've been working on trying to improve the article - like oganizing the sections into their proper places. Just kind of randomly wanted to let ya'll know that,

--{{User:Cheep-Cheep/Sig}} 11:08, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

== Bub ==
The link to "Bub" leads to Goldbub's son, the golden bomb-omb. [[User:Xanofar|Xanofar]] 14:23, 5 January 2009 (EST)

== SM: Sunshine ==
The cheep-cheep-like enemies from Super Mario Sunshine should have their own article, rather than being suggested to be a variant of Bubba, because they themselves are quiet different from most 'traditional' looking cheep-cheeps in the sense that their undersides have some sort of strange filters on them. I don't really get why, but they do. [[User:Xanofar|Xanofar]] 14:26, 5 January 2009 (EST)

:Well, how can we actually confirm it's a different enemy that requires a different article? To me they ''do'' look different. {{User:Supermariofan14/sig}}

Ok, something's wrong here, cuz the [[Bubba]] article claims that the fish described in the ''[[Super Mario Sunshine]]'' section of this article is in fact a Bubba, and not a Cheep-Cheep, but they both say that they do the same things...so which one is which?
{{User:Phoenix/sig}} 08:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

So, it's been a while since this has been discussed apparently, but can we decide on this now? I find it weird that we've had two articles claiming one enemy to be a subspecies of different enemies for this long.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] 20:05, 30 May 2012 (EDT)

:Oh, and I just dug out my old Nintendo Power guide for SMS. It refers to them as Cheep-Cheeps.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] 20:25, 30 May 2012 (EDT)

The Japanese official guide for Sunshine only lists プクプク Puku Puku. No other entries for anything resembling Bubba. [[User:Vent|Vent]] 00:23, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

If both the NA and Japan guides say Cheep-Cheeps, I think we can safely assume they're Cheep-Cheeps.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] 18:43, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

==Name==
Is the name "Cheep-Cheep," "Cheep Cheep," or both? -- {{User|Son of Suns}}

Cheep hyphen Cheep seems to be used more often, though I'm not sure about recently.--{{User|Knife}} 18:44, 2 February 2010 (EST)

[[Cheep-Cheep Island]] is spelled with a hyphen while [[Cheep Cheep Beach]] is not. My guess is that both are accepted. --{{User|Garlic Man}} 18:56, 2 February 2010 (EST)

==Strange Cheep==
Could you send me a picture of the strange Cheep-Cheep in NSMB? No need to send it to my  talk page, just put it here and I'll come by and see it. I don't have the game, so I can't do it myself. And I think it needs a seperate article for itself. --[[User:Yoshidino|Yoshidino]] 02:10, 21 April 2012 (EDT)

== Name ==

In newer games it is called "Cheep Cheep", and not "Cheep-Cheep". Is it a new name? {{User:Ultra Koopa/Sig}} 19:21, 30 May 2012 (EDT)

Based on the section above, the general consensus seems to be that they're both acceptable spellings.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] 20:02, 30 May 2012 (EDT)

== Golden ==

I took a look at the official manual for New Super Mario Bros. U, and the golden Cheep-Cheeps are actually called '''"Eep Cheeps"'''. Should that be changed?[[User:Argonstorm32|Argonstorm32]] ([[User talk:Argonstorm32|talk]]) 22:44, 2 December 2012 (EST)

:A piece of advice, when you got an official source, don't wait for a response. Just knock yourself out.--[[User:Prince Ludwig|Prince Ludwig]] ([[User talk:Prince Ludwig|talk]]) 09:48, 3 December 2012 (EST)

== Question About the Regular Cheep Cheeps in Super Mario Odyssey ==
I see Cheep Cheeps in the Sand Kingdom, but in this case, they are only seen when Mario fishes for a Cheep Cheep as a Fishin' Lakitu, and I don't think they should be marked as enemies in the Sand Kingdom, considering that they don't harm Mario in that kingdom and aren't seen swimming around in the Oasis. [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 13:51, 28 October 2018 (EDT)

Who agrees with this?

== The template for discussing the split into Tobi Fish... ==

...has been around for more than a few years it looks like. Tempted to remove it, but I'm not sure that's my call. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 01:10, July 21, 2019 (EDT)
:Yeah, the discussion probably was settled years ago. Supporting. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 10:30, July 21, 2019 (EDT)
::I don't recall seeing it before, so it's probably newer than you think. And I've edited this page a lot. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 11:24, July 21, 2019 (EDT)
:::The template was added [[Special:Diff/2707586|earlier]] in [[Special:Diff/2707595|July]]. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 09:48, December 29, 2019 (EST)

== A question ==

If Cheep Cheeps weren't in the Super Mario Bros Show then who were those fish shown in the intro?
{{unsigned|Mario123456789}}
:[[Trouter]]s. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:21, January 26, 2021 (EST)

== The "Snow Cheep Cheep" name and resistance to cold temperatures ==

*The wiki is still referring to the Snow Kingdom ones as "Snow Cheep Cheep", but is that an actual name? The Power Moon names are all in title case, so "I Met a Snow Cheep Cheep!" could be intended as "I met a snow Cheep Cheep!", right? Especially considering the moon's name in other languages.
*The article claims that "Besides the coloring, the only difference between the two is that the Snow Kingdom variants are resistant to the extremely cold temperatures in the water." I don't recall lake Cheep Cheeps ever being found near freezing water. Are they ever shown NOT to be resistant to cold temperatures?
[[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 04:58, October 1, 2021 (EDT)
:Did some rewriting. Also, there's a fishing spot in the Snow Kingdom where you can fish up regular Cheep Cheeps (and yes, the water is cold if you try to swim in it). {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 18:51, October 1, 2021 (EDT)

== These Cheep Cheep-related merges... erf (I anticipate another lengthy discussion on fish) ==

{{quote|This place is wackadoodle! It's turning my brain into spaghetti!|Luigi|Fortune Street}} 

[[File:SMWGPB6 Mario Bowser Deafened.png|right|400px|I've been generally disdainful trying to get into this discussion but it must happen.]]
These merges happened a while back but navigating several pages pertaining to Cheep Cheep have been an ongoing difficulty for me, more so while I'm trying to make sense of why this is so. This is not just trying to make sense of the seemingly incoherent page structures of this page, [[Big Cheep Cheep]], [[Cheep Chomp]], [[Spiny Cheep Cheep]], and more but also trying to piece a timeline of proposals that transpired to these splits and merges, short of outright dumpster diving in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/TPP archive|in the Talk Page Proposal archives]]. More often than not I don't find the discussion I need, especially when discussion (including this one, my apologies) revolves around large swaths of text quibbling over naming schemes in guidebooks and whatnot. Seemingly passed proposals don't align with the current state of the page and vice versa (see [[Talk:Cheep Chomp]] [[Talk:Boss Bass]] where there are multitudes of failed merge proposals but are merged because of a talk page proposal on another page, maybe on [[Talk:Big Bertha]], [[Talk:Bubba]], or this talk page?) Basically, I had to navigate this wet warp pipe labyrinth of loosely related articles, talk pages, talk page redirect after talk page redirect. Yesterday, I personally had issues finding out why this passed proposal from [[Talk:Spiny_Cheep_Cheep#Split_Spiny_Fish_from_Spiny_Cheep_Cheep]] didn't line up with the current state of the article until I had to dive into a talk page of a redirect of [[Talk:Spiny Fish]].

My ongoing sentiment, after reviewing some discussion (I haven't read it all, it's been difficult reading it) seemed to have mirrored some lengthy oppose points made in Talk:Cheep Chomp a while back.[https://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Cheep_Chomp#Oppose_2]

*Time Turner: "''However, the biggest reason I disagree [merging to Cheep Chomp] is for one simple question: why? What do we gain by lumping all of these fish into a select few articles? It's technically simpler for navigation, but heck, we can merge any number of articles to make it simpler for navigation, but convenience to the reader is lost. Someone who searches for Flopsy Fish, something that appears entirely distinctly from Cheep Cheeps, is going to be confused as to why they show up in the article for Cheep Cheeps with seemingly no reason, with the article claiming that Flopsy Fish are actually Cheep Cheeps, and personally, it's something I find jarring. This is especially true if they're searching through Google; there's a tiny blurb that gives no context to where the information is located, and the link brings them straight to the top.''"

*Walkazo: "''There is nothing wrong with having lots of little articles about slightly different takes on enemies: thoroughness in niche wikis is good as long as it doesn't get silly, and splits on an English site based on different English names, when backed up by design and/or behavioural differences more significant than the likes of RPG enemy palette-swaps, is not silly. A small handful of extra one-off appearances pages does no harm: just use {{tem|main}} on the parent page and you're set for navigation, and having the separate names ensures we get all the search traffic and don't risk frustrating readers with redirects where they expect articles.''" [...] "''And I'm sure a lot of non-biologist gamers, who may or may not even care about the Japanese names, feel the same way, and will wonder why the Super Mario Wiki of all places doesn't have a page for something as basic as a 'Boss Bass'.''"

[[File:TetrisAttackSNES-LungeFishProfile.png|left]]
The first part took account into search engine discoverability, which was partly the reason I was also generally more pro-split back in the day, but the last part also struck me a lot. I was also puzzled why we don't have a page on Boss Bass or Big Bertha, instead being redirected to Big Cheep Cheep and finding out that the "Boss Bass" in Yoshi's Island DS is found in Cheep Chomp? I am CURRENTLY experiencing a lot of frustration with redirects of Boss Bass, Big Bertha, Bub, Bubba, Piscatory Pete, and so on, having difficulties finding information for the subject I'm looking for, as they're found in these crowded articles. I'm also thinking about the comment Steve made a while back regarding the Chuckster merge[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Porplemontage&diff=3770278&oldid=3770155][https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Porplemontage&diff=3770353&oldid=3770309] which I think applies here: several of these fish merges are hurting our search engine discoverability. It also appears at least one reader in [[Talk:Cheep Chomp]] is confused by this, (and I had a lot of issues tracing that comment back in the meantime!)[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Cheep_Chomp&diff=2758514&oldid=2758506] and the reasoning for the confusing merge appeared to be "Japanese name": quite literally "''That's all there is to it.''" (more on that). There's another lengthy comment also being confused by the merge.[https://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Big_Cheep_Cheep#Welp_I_missed_the_proposal_deadline] If just being on hiatus for several months at a time can cause me to be confused, I can only imagine how it must be for the average reader to stumble on the page, the average reader who won't go on talk pages because talk pages can be rather boring if you're not invested in the information (I mean I always encourage readers to check talk pages if they dispute any information on the page; they should also always view pages with a critical eye, but most people just aren't trained to be critical thinkers).

When I asked around why these pages are the way they are, the common response I got, and from the tedious, boring, mind-numbing paragraphs of text I had to wade through, circle frequently around obscure Japanese guidebooks, very specific contradictions, and other media that is obtuse and not as easily apparent as readers get from the page and maybe references to tidbits from data leaks, or using these tidbits as a basis for then overplaying "just a design oddity".

Severa cases here. I'm likely missing more because I'm still spending an afternoon reading through this.
*The Big Cheep Cheep/Boss Bass/Big Bertha situation is a messy one. In Big Bertha' case there's even a character called "Bertha" in allusion to this (who is a redirect to Big Cheep Cheep, the most baffling redirect I've seen). The reason Big Bertha is merged with Boss Bass are primarily appearance similarities and a shared Japanese name, and I'm not seeing anyone address the argument on WHY Big Bertha even has a separate name in the first place, because I think "initial creators' intent" was the assumed talking point. Later on, we get Boss Bass/Big Bertha being merged to Big Cheep Cheep[https://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Big_Cheep_Cheep#Merge_Boss_Bass_and_Blurp_(Yoshi's_Story)_here] based on technicalities like "boss bass underwater are big bertha and don't act like boss bass" and "Japanese names and data leaks. It's basically a double merge.
*See [[Talk:Piscatory Pete]]; Piscatory Pete is merged to Cheep Cheep despite existing and looking very different in the same game as Flopsy Fish [[File:Flopsy Fish.PNG]][[File:Piscatory Pete.png]], also merged with Cheep Cheep, and the reasoning hinges on highly specific technical jargon, on sprite assembly, a shared Japanese name, and contradicting(!) guidebooks having a name shared with Cheep Cheep (despite Flopsy Fish having a separate name) though on first glance they are sprites for two completely different-looking fish to be in the same article as each other. That this peculiar fish gets reused for Yoshi's Island DS is dismissed because Yoshi's Island DS lazily reuses sprites anyway. Couldn't it just be possible that the developers saw Piscatory Pete as its own entity and reused its sprite? I get why Flopsy Fish should be merged, as it's just a weird name of a Cheep Cheep as how "Mace Penguin" was used for Spike, but why also Piscatory Pete?
*Cheep Chomp: I understand the angle that maybe it was created as a Boss Bass replacement starting with Super Mario 64 DS due to having similarish appearances but the merges on this page hinted entirely on Japanese names with no regard with physical appearance. The whole confusion surrounding Bubba is really apparent when I have constant issues figuring out the Cheep Cheep in Banshee Boardwalk is and why it's Big Cheep Cheep but replaced by Boss Bass (but that article is merged to Big Cheep Cheep) it's apparently Cheep Chomp. The Boss Bass in Yoshi's Island DS is also not Boss Bass despite two sources, but Cheep Chomp due to a Japanese name?? How did this split happen? I'd like to know because it's difficult tracing this one.

I understand when people cite Japanese names and guidebooks to discern enemies from each other, but all too often it's used as a bludgeon over localized names[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Cheep_Chomp&diff=2758514&oldid=2758506] (assuming the Boss Bass name for the YIDS boss is just a "flub" while assuming the Japanese name as correct) over the flimsy reasoning of "creator intent" [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?sort=relevance&sort=relevance&search=creator%27s+intent&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns1=1&ns3=1&ns5=1&ns7=1&ns9=1&ns11=1&ns13=1&ns15=1&ns101=1&ns103=1&ns105=1&ns275=1&ns829=1&ns2301=1&ns2303=1 a flimsy frequent talking point]) that relies on a premise assumed to be true, "begging the question". The premise being "Mario is a Japanese series and so Japanese developers have more 'involvement' making and organizing names". That localized names are automatically somehow more contrived than Japanese names (although Japanese names are definitely contrived! Also do localizers not cooperate with Japanese developers?) In reality, video game developers don't pay much attention to naming schemes and enemy organizations as we think we do, not as much as they need to make a game for people to enjoy and a world to make minimum sense; this is a topic for another day, but people who edit wikis need to come to terms with this and then also also keep functionality for our wiki in mind while considering convoluted contrivances in Japanese guidebooks and occasional localization hiccup.

If nothing falls through, then ''please'' at least we need a way of documenting proposals that affect older ones because it was super frustrating for me to search through several talk pages and also wondering if there were fish proposals on MarioWiki:Proposals I missed. I'm also very sorry about starting this discussion on Big Cheep Cheep, because I feel in the future, if people want to refer to my thoughts, it'll be tricky figuring out which fish talk page started it all, so I do encourage linking here and there when needed. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:04, October 29, 2022 (EDT)
:I won't steal your shtick of putting an image of Mario with a thumbs up here but pretend I accomplished those general vibes. I agree with pretty much everything here and I've never liked all these merges focusing on Cheep Cheeps and their variants (yes I supported the Boss Bass into Big Cheep Cheep merge back when it happened, looking back on it I do regret that and think it was a misstep on my part) and I really don't know why they keep happening. Japanese names are not and should not be the ultimate deciding factors for cases like this, and I don't like the sentiment that some people have that when it comes to naming if the developers do it it's right and if the localizers do it it's wrong. That devalues the localization process too much and assumes way too much of the developers themselves, it's a 40-year old game franchise with likely thousands of people who have worked on it over that time. Properties with far more dedication to continuity have made bigger mistakes. If localizers can apply the same name to two different subjects or apply two different names to the same subject, why can't the developers do the exact same thing? Why can we point out that the localizers made a mistake but [[Cheep_Chomp#Yoshi's_Island_DS|can't acknowledge and correct what is clearly a developer mistake that the localizers themselves caught on to]]? (It's got the design and localized name of Boss Bass, but apparently the Japanese name being shared with Cheep Chomp trumps that for some reason.)<br>Overall I think the current state of the merges are too complicated and will confuse the heck out of the average reader, and it doesn't harm us at all to have separate articles for subjects like Boss Bass or Bubba or Piscatory Pete, we may actually be shooting ourselves in the foot by merging these. By the current setup, in ''Mario Kart DS'' Cheep Chomp (which is also Bubba) appears with the appearance of a Boss Bass which is actually an old design for Big Cheep Cheep. And this isn't confusing how? Time Turner and Walkazo's points still stand and I agree with them 100%. We have entities here that have consistent designs and names attached with them - let them have pages! Frankly I couldn't care less what their Japanese name is in these cases. The average reader isn't going to get this. It's not our job to "educate" them that, for example, Boss Bass and Big Cheep Cheep are actually the same thing when we really don't even know that ourselves. Split things back up so that it's not confusing, and if we run into things like "this fish with this design has the same Japanese name as that fish with that design" then make note of it and move on. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 20:45, October 29, 2022 (EDT)

:Okay, I do not mean any offense for this whole blurb I wrote up, but I'm gonna be honest here; I am not convinced.

:1. The part about the talk pages being cluttered and seemingly contradictory is not a Cheep Cheep issue, it's a natural progression of splits and merges happening over the course of this wiki's lifespan. Of course the pages will get a bit cross-linked. We don't have a set guideline/archive page to store every proposal, so there's no limit to where a talk page proposal can be in the Talk: namespace. If you want to make a proposal to create standardized archives holding every talk page proposal similar to how we handle regular proposals, go right ahead honestly.

:2. If people are confused about why a completely different looking/acting thing being on one page when it looks so different from the "standard" version of that page's enemy/character/thing, that's what text is for. Redesigns are surprising and even confusing to new readers, yes, but [[Pokey|it's]] [[Bully|something]] [[Amp|this]] [[Thwomp|series]] [[Spike|is]] [[Whomp|no]] [[Scuttlebug|stranger]] [[Dry Bones|towards]]. This page alone can be used as proof that redesigns are, in fact, a prominent thing on this wiki; just look at Cheep Cheep's appearances in Super Mario World, Yoshi's Story, and Super Mario Sunshine.

:3. The part about links taking people to the top of a page instead of a specific section is going to happen no matter what. Most article searches online don't take you specifically to the part of the text you searched & that appeared on an article preview, but that's what Ctrl+F is for. Just use that when you're on the article.

:4. Despite what many people may think, all these recent merges have ''not'' been significantly impacting our search results. [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Super%20Mario%20Wiki,Mario%20Wiki,Mariowiki Here's] a graph showing the search results for the Super Mario Wiki. Our "peak" search results was during the period of 2010-2012, and most of the merges in question for this discussion happened from 2017 to the present day. [[Talk:Big_Cheep_Cheep#Merge_Boss_Bass_and_Blurp_(Yoshi's_Story)_here|The ones concerning]] [[Talk:Spiny_Cheep_Cheep#Include_Every_Derivative_Togepuku_in_This_Article,_or_Split_Them_All|the Cheep]] [[Talk:Piscatory_Pete#Merge_to_Cheep_Cheep|Cheeps]] happened in 2017 for Spiny Cheep, 2020 for Big Cheep, and 2021 for Piscatory Pete. Merging articles is, from what I am able to see, not as big of a factor in determining search result prominence as many people have recently begun to think.

:5. If our goal is to describe Mario information to the best of our ability to the public, then accuracy to the series and all its nooks and crannies is what we should focus on, not just the surface-level "how the casual readers might see it" info. the Mario series may not be "down the trench" deep but it most certainly does have more than a few moments that raise questions that cannot be answered by a simple "it looks like [X result], so it is [X result]" statement. For example, would a casual reader know that [[Sky-High Sundae]] was developed originally as a Tour course despite releasing on 8 Deluxe a day earlier? I don't think so, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't tell people that when it's the truth.

:6. The Cheep Chomp/Boss Bass confusion in YIDS is not as big of a confusion as you seem to make it; even if we are putting aside Japanese names, [[:File:BigCheepCheep YIDS.png|its design]] in that game looks ''exactly'' like [[:File:MKDS Banshee Boardwalk Bubba.png|its design]] from SM64DS and MKDS, which is itself just what it looks like nowadays but with typical Cheep Cheep coloration instead of purple skin with a green dorsal fin. It's not that confusing when you just look at the images.

:7. Again, having trouble finding information on a big page is not an issue that stems from us merging some articles together, it's literally just a by-product of a page being big. Someone may find it a little tricky to spot [[Goomba]]'s info about X niche game due to scrolling, but does that mean we split off Goomba's info on that game into a new page to "make it easier to see"?

:8. If a reader won't take the time to look at a talk page & see what discussions got a page to be what it currently is like, that's their own problem. It's not something we can really fix.

:9. "obscure Japanese guidebooks"? The guidebooks we use are 95% of the time from Shogakukan, which is basically what PRIMA/Nintendo Power is to the English world. Its guidebooks are no more or less obscure than PRIMA's/Nintendo Power's are. And Shogakukan is officially recognized by Nintendo and has been from the beginning, which is saying quite a lot to the legitimacy of using them as a reference.(and to compare legitimacy and volatility of NOA vs. NOJ, here's an example; compare the amount of changes from the SMW2 Player's Guide to the SMA3 Player's Guide, and then compare the changes from the SMW2 Shogakukan Guide to the SMA3 (and YIDS/YNI for the matter) Shogakukan Guides. I'd link to scans for this but [https://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Bubble_Dayzee#Comments_2 this comment from LTL] sums it up pretty well.)

:10. On your points about the specific cases;

::"''In Big Bertha' case there's even a character called "Bertha" in allusion to this''" - That was from a comic system that also turned [[Mouser]] into a species called "mice". It's just characterization so that people have something to react to in the comic's story.

::"''I'm not seeing anyone address the argument on WHY Big Bertha even has a separate name in the first place''" - Because "Boss Bass" and "Big Bertha" came from a PRIMA guide that saw the same enemy doing two different things and made two separate names for them, a la the [[Ukiki|Seedy Sally/Short Fuse/Grinder]] situation. Note how MPS uses Boss Bass's/Big Bertha's original Japanese name of "Kyodai Pukupuku" to refer to a generic Big Cheep Cheep, how Mario Portal recently re-translated Big Bertha's name as "Mega Cheep Cheep", and (I'm pretty sure that) encyclopedia SMB said something about Boss Bass being called Big Bertha when underwater in the English version (which we can't site because plagiarism but the fact is that it still happened before we even merged any Big Cheep Cheeps).

::"''and the reasoning hinges on highly specific technical jargon, on sprite assembly, a shared Japanese name, and contradicting(!) guidebooks having a name shared with Cheep Cheep (despite Flopsy Fish having a separate name)''" - How is the sprite thing "technical jargon" when that same game used two completely different spriting methods for the various sizes of [[Milde]] in [[Marching Milde's Fort]], and how is the guidebook stuff contradictory? Shogakukan used one entry to refer to both in SMW2, and when they made a separate entry for it in the remake's guidebook they didn't give it a separate name, just an identifier. If by "contradictory" you mean English versus Japanese then that's the same reasoning as the previously mentioned Seedy Sally/Short Fuse/Grinder situation. Localizations have always been more split-happy than Japan has.

::"''Couldn't it just be possible that the developers saw Piscatory Pete as its own entity and reused its sprite?''" - Possibly, but we can't know that without actually asking the developers themselves. It's best to go with the official research we already have, which treats Piscatory Pete as a fully-underwater version of Cheep Cheep (and honestly, I'm not too opposed anymore to doing the same for Bubble Dayzee for consistency as well).

::"''I have constant issues figuring out the Cheep Cheep in Banshee Boardwalk is and why it's Big Cheep Cheep but replaced by Boss Bass''" - Again, look at the actual thing. It's design is just Cheep Chomp's SM64DS design (ie, its current design with normal Cheep Cheep coloration). This coupled with the Japanese name & no contradictory English sources for MKDS suggests it being Cheep Chomp with no signs pointing otherwise for this iteration.

::"''The Boss Bass in Yoshi's Island DS is also not Boss Bass despite two sources, but Cheep Chomp due to a Japanese name??''"- Again. The design is identical. The L.O.O. name is identical. The function is identical. The english sources just pulled a Seedy Sally/Short Fuse/Grinder.

:11. The point about Mario being a Japanese series and that somehow makes Japan more reliable...yes, yes that's correct. Why wouldn't it be? Count all the times a localization blunder (or if you really are set on the "this is an English wiki" card, just the blunders in English) has happened and then count all the times there were blunders in the country/language of origin. Which do you think will tally to more blunders overall? The truth is that localizing a game invokes changing some parts of the story to better suit a new audience, which will create more discrepancies between the country/language of origin than the country/language of origin will create within itself. Yes, Japanese names can be a little kooky sometimes (like with [[ComBat|"Sweaty Youngster"]] for instance), but they're far outweighed by the wacky names made up by the localizations. Just look at all the name mishaps in [[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]]; they named Exor's mouth "Neosquid", called the basic fireball attack "drain", they named Cheep Cheeps "Goby", etc. L.O.O. will be more consistent and reliable than localizations could be.

:12. Yes, game developers don't care about enemy organization as much as we seem to think. But there's times when they ''do'', such as with encyclopedia, so there's no harm done in us caring about enemy organization a little more than they do. We have more reasons to organize things, after all; we're a wiki, not a recreational game.

:Overall, I don't see any reason to think something went wrong with the way we handle fish now. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 20:53, October 29, 2022 (EDT)
::I don't have the energy to address this entire comment but I will point out that this has nothing to do with the search results for the wiki itself (we're obviously not getting substantially less traffic because we merged some pages) but the search results for specific subjects if their pages are instead merged into larger ones. Also yes, the SMRPG localization was... certainly a thing, but that's also a pretty extreme example (worked on by someone not involved with Nintendo, mind you) and not a good representative of localization for the franchise in general. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 21:09, October 29, 2022 (EDT)
:::I don't have a lot of time for this either, but I'll add that Mario Portal more or less reconfirms much of the current organization. Also, I never really found the search result argument too convincing. Don't misunderstand me - I get where it's coming from - but ''Mario'' is not a niche series that needs all the help we can muster, and if it ever could be considered one at some point, hardly in this wiki's own lifetime, or even many of its users for that matter: it's a massive, multi-million mascot franchise. With no shortage of subjects to draw articles from, merges/splits theoretically affect the wiki's performance little in the grand scheme of things, and if that's such a concern, the time would ideally be served by filling in red links and making more unique articles. Besides, if the closest competition wants to do things differently, it's my belief that it'd be best to remain firm in our wiki differences than to allow it to be a major factor in switching up our coverage, which would probably give the wrong impression of "following the leader" at this point. Of course, I admit that I could be reading details in the situation incorrectly, but that's my take from where I'm standing. [EDIT: I'd be remiss not to mention the top ''Mario''-related search engine results for Boss Bass and Big Bertha are still this wiki's disambig pages, which basically renders that angle irrelevant here.] Now, I do agree that supplanted and obsoleted proposals need a better navigation system. On the [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive|archive]] [[MarioWiki:Proposals/TPP archive|pages]], we have a helpful color-coded table that tells us the status of each proposal, but the problem areas are the yellow (passed, but is no longer enforced or applicable) and blue (failed, but proposed changes are currently enforced) categories. They don't direct us exactly to which newer proposals or policies affect older ones, and thus, sometimes you have shift through [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZLg1ARnaxE a lot of fish] to find what you're looking for. So I think what would go a long way to help alleviate confusion would be a new parameter for settled proposals, or maybe a new template altogether, that actually points us to supplanted and obsoleted proposal outcomes. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 08:25, October 30, 2022 (EDT)

== Why are there 2 Cheep Cheeps on Yoshi Island? ==

I can understand why floppy fish is merged with cheep cheep, but what about piscatory pete? It makes no sense that they make 2 cheeps cheeps for a single game, and also that they have different mechanics, this deserves a review for a future division 
Also in the Yoshi Island DS Enemy Museum both enemies are separated, this really doesn't make sense.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:The Yoshi's Island DS guides (plural) refer to "Pete" as Cheep Cheep while the "Flopsy Fish" gets the "Flopsy Fish" name. And they've always both been "Pukupuku" in Japanese. They have different designs simply because "Flopsy Fish" requires more pieces for its animations than the single 16x16 pixel sprite "Pete" needs. Plus, ''New Island'' and ''Woolly World'' wrapped them together into a more modernized Cheep Cheep design. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:06, March 2, 2025 (EST)
The Cheeps Cheeps from Yoshi New Island act like Blurps swimming in a straight line, the ones from Wolly World act like normal Cheeps Cheeps swimming a bit and turning around. The Pete Piscatory on the other hand have two variants, the blue ones swim in a straight line braking from time to time, and the red ones chase Yoshi going in the direction he is and not directly at him. If in the Yoshi Island guides they are mentioned that they are Cheeps Cheeps (same guides that call Flopsy Fish a separate species from Cheeps Cheeps) then at least they should put Cheep Cheep (Yoshi series)[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
::Blurps and Cheep Cheeps have no consistent behavior differences between each other; the blue Petes act like how either of those act in ''Super Mario Land 2''. This situation isn't really any different to how there were two designs and behaviors of [[Bob-omb]]s in ''Super Mario Bros. 3'', or two different designs and behaviors of [[Fly Guy]]s in ''Yoshi's Story'' - and besides, there usually is a "jumping" and "swimming" type of Cheep-Cheep in any given game, they just decided to use the SMW design for the swimming ones here while using the artwork design for the jumping ones. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:32, March 2, 2025 (EST)
In that game both Cheeps Cheeps and Blurps have the same behavior, although sometimes there are Cheeps Cheeps that swim vertically, also those examples that you mentioned can be understood more because although they were different behaviors for the same individual with minimal physical difference they did not have proper names, unlike Pete, also Pete does not use the same SMW Sprite, lastly you did not mention to me about the red variant, which I think is the most unique.
In fact, looking a little deeper into Pete, I realized that more than a Cheep Cheep, he looks like an awakened Rip Van Fish from SMW
[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:It uses the general design Cheep Cheep had in SMW, with a mix of Blurp's and Rip's traits added in. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:16, March 3, 2025 (EST)
Mmmmm, I still don't see it but I understand where you're going with this, however it's still a new design, if we merged enemies because they have the same or similar designs there would be a lot less[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:In this case, we merged them because they are called "Cheep Cheeps" in both English and Japanese, and they act like standard underwater Cheep Cheeps with small adjustments for the "Submarine Yoshi" gameplay. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:24, March 3, 2025 (EST)
In that case, why don't we also merge other enemies that have the same name in Japanese and look alike, like the case of Pokey from Yoshi Island: Super Mario World 2?[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
::That is also something I support doing, especially since "Spiked Fun Guy" is AWOL in YNI in favor of traditional Pokeys. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:47, March 3, 2025 (EST)
So I think this is going to have to lead to a lot of introspection on the page about how we're going to use Japanese names over everything else, especially because unfortunately unlike you and me and all the members of this wiki, Nintendo cares little or nothing about the naming of enemies most of the time, reusing names for other enemies or simply not even giving them names in other languages, I think it would be good to have a discussion about to what extent as a wiki we should interpret Japanese names as the absolute truth, especially since there are other languages that interpret names differently, again I repeat that these issues Nintendo hardly cares at all so in the end this ends up being confusing and difficult to understand[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:Again, though, that ignores that in ''Yoshi's Island'', neither were called "Cheep Cheep" in English, while in ''Yoshi's Island DS'', only the blue/yellow ones were called "Cheep Cheep" in English. Going off English name, the "logical" solution would be to split Flopsy Fish since it keeps the separate name there. Also, these were merged a few years back due to a proposal; "Piscatory Pete" was previously split, and determined to be a counterproductive one. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 21:52, March 3, 2025 (EST)
Why it would be counterproductive to divide an individual? and the other thing about Yoshi island ds is clearly an example of what I told you, what most differentiated flopsy fish from a common Cheep Cheeps besides its behavior, were its yellow fins while in Yoshi island ds it loses that color, obtaining the design of a cheeps cheep, however as I told you Nintendo does not care much about this so it will give names to enemies due to ignorance, disinterest or laziness, so again I cite an introspection as to how much we should take certain names of enemies giving priority to other languages and having our own criteria, obviously also taking into account what Nintendo says however if you notice Nintendo has not taken an inspection on these enemies, as was given in Mario portal, so I say that also as a community of the Mario Wiki we should begin to have our own criteria on certain issues until waiting for a more official and reliable confirmation.  Now back to Flopsy and Pete, it's obvious which one is more like a Cheep Cheep and which one isn't, however Nintendo only named one Flopsy and then renamed the other one so I either propose splitting Pete or splitting Flopsy. (I wish every game had a complete bestiary with official names)[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:I think the simplest solution is to leave them as they are now, for the same reason that [[File:PropellerShyGuyGreen.png]] can be the same as [[File:Yoshi'sStoryFlyGuy.png]] within the same game. To say nothing of how, again, YNI's redesigns confirmed they are indeed intended to be the same thing - otherwise, they'd have given the swimming Cheep Cheeps a different appearance to match the SMW2 ones, like they did with every non-main-series enemy in that game. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:52, March 3, 2025 (EST)
Why are those enemies joined together? Besides the ability to fly I don't see anything similar, I'd like to see. By the way, it's not the first time that certain enemies are tempered by others for a main function, see the case of puffer cheep, mecha chomp, and others, it's not because they were intentional in the first place, but they prefer to use a more recognized enemy as you'll see in the previous cases. Nothing stopped Nintendo from using the SMW model for SMW2 with the flopsy and pete, but why didn't they? Because they're not the same, or at least pete isn't at least[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:If they are deliberately named the same thing in the same game and otherwise {{file link|Super Mario Yossy Island Shogakukan P7.jpg|grouped together as the same thing}}, then yes, they are indeed the same thing. There's really no contesting that, it's objectively Nintendo's word on the subject, and trying to split something that isn't there really just amounts to fanon. Sorry, but that's really just the way it is. Note how the previous guide scan there splits things like L. Mouser and L. Skull Mouser, Green Glove and Slugger, and all those Goonies and Lakitus, but leaves the Cheeps under one heading. In fact, the only things on there that they don't split that we do are Big Boo and Bowling Goonie, which are split in ''later'' sources of the same series. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:56, March 3, 2025 (EST)
Wow, this is very confusing, I guess you're right, I got carried away by my fanaticism a bit in this case, however I would like Nintendo to be clearer about these things, if you're going to create a cheep cheep enemy, call him cheep cheep, what a shame, well all that's left is to continue discussing to improve the Wiki, thanks Don von Schmeltwick, I'll see you in the Mikey Mine discussion.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:Well to be fair, they do call them Cheep Cheeps nowadays XD. The people who wrote the ''Yoshi's Island'' Player's Guide tried to inject some 90s "radical" vibes in every so often, which is part of what led to silly things like that. They also split other weird things, like certain monkeys and things that don't even have behavior differences. But yeah, you're good, don't worry 👍 [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 01:57, March 4, 2025 (EST)

== New Japanese name for Piscatory Pete!! ==

In the discussion page of [[Ice Block]], a user found an unknown [https://archive.org/details/yoshiislandshogakukan/001.jpg Japanese Guide of Yoshi Island], where there are Japanese names never seen before, on page 33 there is a new Japanese name for Piscatory Pete Take a [https://archive.org/details/yoshiislandshogakukan/064-065.jpg look][[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 17:45, March 9, 2025 (EDT)
:Added! Keep in mind that this is merged via a [[Talk:Piscatory Pete|previous proposal]] (though if I had known about this earlier, coupled with my [[Island Museum]] observation, I may have been on the side of splitting). [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 23:00, March 10, 2025 (EDT)
::After the other 4 proposals are finished I will do this one and a few more.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:::That name is just "underwater Cheep Cheep", which I guess is more unique than "Cheep Cheep (underwater)", but I think you'll understand why I'm not particularly interested in splitting an underwater version of a fish enemy mostly found underwater anyway. It's like Sky Blooper, but the other way around. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 07:52, March 11, 2025 (EDT)
::::It's not the first time, we have enemies with minimal changes in their respective pages just because of a different name, like sub goomba, Itsunomanika Heihō[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:::::Please note that the exact opposite situation happened for the same enemy in NSMB, where jumping Cheep Cheeps were referred to as "Tobipuku" for that game alone. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:53, March 11, 2025 (EDT)
::::::Unlike NSMB's mistake, in later games like Yoshi Island DS they continued to be seen as different enemies, and finally their biggest difference is that unlike the exclusive Japanese name of Jumping Cheep Cheep, Pete Piscatory has a different name in several languages, including the Spanish one, also without mentioning the physical difference.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
::::::And not even ''Encyclopedia Super Mario Bros.'' and ''Mario Portal'' honor the ''New Super Mario Bros.'' jumping Cheep Cheep. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 18:20, March 11, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::That's not a "mistake" any more than this was. It was an attempt at splitting that just didn't take in the long run, much like this one - again, they use the standard design in YNI and YWW, while of course YIDS was going to keep it when they already used SMW2's sprites with added shading anyway. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:25, March 11, 2025 (EDT)
::::::::I don't think it was an attempt at splitting, especially since in no other language had they been differentiated, plus the cheeps could already jump since the original game, on the other hand if in Yoshi Island DS Nintendo really wanted to show that they were the same they would have put them together, as well as the other color variants in other sections of the museum, finally we already have a more unique Japanese name that although it is a little strange is different and indicates that it is an enemy separate from the normal cheep cheep, wrongly called flopsy fish in the English language, just compare, an "attempt at separation" in a single language, or an enemy with different names in the other languages and with a behavior that differentiates it from other cheeps cheeps, which also has a subvariant that has the ability to chase Yoshi[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
:::::::::{{file link|Super Mario Yossy Island Shogakukan P7.jpg|Like the original game's "main" Shogakukan guide explicitly does?}} The Island Museum doesn't even label enemies, it just groups them by their sprites. These have different sprites because, in the original, the jumping ones needed to be made out of multiple layered tiles in order to move smoothly, while the swimming ones could just get by with a single 16x16px tile that isn't as resource-intensive. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:29, March 11, 2025 (EDT)
::::::::::Well we have two official guides, one groups them, another separates them like all the other languages, also with the information that Link left below, it makes me believe more in the other guide, which also brought a unique name for Prince Froggy and Bowling Goonie unlike the shogakukan guide, also I repeat, why would they make two models for the same enemy out of the water and in the water? especially with the example of cheeps cheeps in his first appearance more than 10 years apart, also something they could have done in Yoshi island DS to indicate that they are the same enemy is to recolor pete piscatory, just as they did with Bullet Bill which in the original game was green but in this game they made him look more like the original [[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]])
::::::::::Here's something you might find interesting, Doc: [[tcrf:Development:Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island/Entities#PIRA0|the leaks]] indicate that Piscatory Pete / Piranha are wholly separate assets from Cheep Cheep / Pukupuku. So, I'd like to present an alternate theory: this was penciled in as a generic fish enemy that got a quick ''Super Mario World'' sprite edit as a permanent placeholder, confusing fans and pros alike. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 19:35, March 11, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::::::That is interesting, though it would hardly be the only time that happened with Cheep Cheep given ''Super Mario Sunshine'' having a similar deal with the pink ones having their own model and file names - despite ESMB/Portal not bothering to differentiate ''them'', either. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:55, March 11, 2025 (EDT)

== Split {{fake link|Piscatory Pete}} from Cheep Cheep ==
{{TPP}}
While before the only official guide we had classified them as the same enemy, recently in a discussion, another [https://archive.org/details/yoshiislandshogakukan/064-065.jpg oficcial] guide was discovered that does give it its own name in Japanese, which although it means Underwater Pukupuku, it is still a different name, this accompanied by the different names in other languages that also separate them, also the Yoshi Island [https://youtu.be/by5NSjAFiKg?t=143 DS museum] where they are also separated as different individuals, and more importantly, thanks to an investigation by LinkTheLefty, it was found that Pete Piscatoryhas has his assets [https://tcrf.net/Development:Super_Mario_World_2:_Yoshi%27s_Island/Entities#PIRA0 separated] from Cheep Cheep assets.

All of the above without mentioning that Piscatory Pete has a sub-variant that is capable of [https://youtu.be/vSytQElPl-M?t=647 chasing Yoshi], behavior that has not been seen separately from the enemy.

'''Proposer''': {{User|Sorbetti}}<br>
'''Deadline''': April 1, 2025, 23:59 GMT

===Split Fishy(Support)===
#{{User|Sorbetti}} Per proposal.
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} Honestly, I don't find the guides to be compelling sources in this case. The ones throughout the ''Yoshi's Island'' series have pretty much all changed a few details, and the wiki just kind of had to pick around them; the part that seems constant is that Flopsy Fish is intended to be the "base" Cheep Cheep, and with the ''Yoshi's Island DS'' Island Museum splitting Flopsy Fish and Piscatory Pete, I don't really think it's any skin off our back to write off the latter as a variant of the former. At the end of the day, it's still a Cheep Cheep, just not the game's "main" one. A similar case can  possibly be made for merging the Boo sizes in ''Yoshi's Island'' and ''Yoshi's Island DS'', except ''Yoshi's New Island'' threw a spanner in that idea when they came back as returning enemies: Piscatory Pete got no such treatement, being replaced by what was supposed to be the newer Deep Cheep.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} I rescind my original thoughts on merging
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per LTL.

===Keep Fishy Merged(Oppose)===
#{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}} - A majority of sources in both Japanese and English treat these just as Cheep Cheeps, {{file link|Super Mario Yossy Island Shogakukan P7.jpg|the most "primary" Japanese guide outright lists them together}} (the guide you mentioned, which is not of the usual ''Kōshiki'' guide series, is an outlier), and YNI and YWW use the same Cheep Cheep model for both the jumping and swimming types; the only differences in behavior are due to how Submarine/other-swimming-type Yoshi has changed. The fact that a separate-looking blue or yellow fish does not exist in YNI while swimming red or green ones do, despite the amount of other direct enemy throwbacks the game has, demonstrates the developers see it as an ordinary Cheep Cheep. Note the other enemies that are commonly recurring also have their designs updated in that game rather than using SNES-accurate designs like the ones that are pretty much exclusive to the series are given, even when that results in design inconsistencies between them and the "base" type (like with [[Propeller Piranha]]'s spots, which still resemble SNES Piranha Plants' despite Piranha Plants themselves being given a modern design). Anyways, if they are split, "Cheep Cheep" with an identifier would be the name since that's the most current, and the English YIDS guides treated it as the game's "normal" Cheep Cheeps. [[File:SMWCheepCheep.png]][[File:SMW2 Piscatory Pete yellow.png]][[File:CheepCheepYS.png]] <-Also these look pretty similar to me, at least.
#{{user|Blinker}} Per Doc von Schmeltwick. At least with Sky Blooper, regular Bloopers are usually not found flying. Cheep Cheeps, on the other hand, are already usually found underwater. They are fish. Splitting this game's underwater Cheep Cheeps would be strange.
#{{User|Arend}} Cheep Cheeps are already primarily underwater, and Piscatory Pete's been renamed to "Cheep Cheep" since ''[[Yoshi's Island DS]]''. I think splitting Pete from the other Cheeps entirely due to an alternate Japanese name that already translates to "Underwater Cheep Cheep" is gonna be quite a mess. Not to mention we're not splitting Upside-down Spiny either even when its Japanese name is さかさトゲゾー as opposed to トゲゾー(さかさ).
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Per Doc von Schmeltwick.
#{{User|LadySophie17}} per Doc and Arend.

===Underwater Comments===
[[File:TetrisAttackSNES-LungeFishProfile.png|thumb]]
Say, what enemy is depicted in this image? It's jumping out of water and looks similar to the sprites for the jumping Cheep Cheeps, but is blue like so-called "Piscatory Pete". [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 14:59, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:Eh? ''Tetris Attack'' bases its illustrations on ''Yoshi's Island'' artwork, which has some coloring discrepancies compared to the in-game sprites. In this case, it's based on this [[:File:SMW2 YI Cheep Cheep.png|green guy]], which is identified as [https://archive.org/details/yoshiislandshogakukan/040-041.jpg Flopsy Fish]. Besides that, the fins and lips are still closer to Flopsy Fish. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 16:06, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::Most of the coloring discrepancies in the original ''Yoshi's Island'' were "blue enemy looks purple," which later games like YNI would keep as the primary color. Honestly, this is making me think the green Cheep in the artwork was meant to be the chasey underwater one after all, given it looks greenish with the water filtering over it. Not unlike how Boss Bass/Big Bertha's artwork tends to mix in traits of both. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:46, March 18, 2025 (EDT)

[[Talk:Piscatory Pete#Merge to Cheep Cheep|This is the proposal that got them merged]], for reference. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 15:22, March 18, 2025 (EDT)

Just FYI, it looks like the All-Color series is 100% Shogakukan (with Nintendo supervision), just like their ''Kōshiki'' guides. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 15:51, March 18, 2025 (EDT)

{{@|LinkTheLefty}} - Swimming red ones are present in YNI as well. From what I can tell, the blue and yellow ones got adapted to the red and green ones, then the behavior got changed so the latter type no longer chase due to the sub no longer having a means to defend itself. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 16:27, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:That's fake, the reds only swim in a straight line, while the greens swim forward going up and down, neither of them use any Pete Piscatory mechanics from YIMW2 and YIDS
:And the thing was because the submarine has no way to defend itself goes into "shoulda/woulda/coulda" like you say [[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 20:28, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::They're made easier to deal with to make up for the tilt controls. Like how Bubba in SM64DS is a lot easier than the one in SM64 due to the control change there. Internally, the green one was labeled as "Search Pukupuku," implying they originally intended it to act as the chasey underwater ones from the previous game before retooling their behaviors. They're still the same enemy as the SMW2 ones. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:50, March 18, 2025 (EDT)

:I mean, is it possible that the designers were thinking of Piscatory Pete? Sure. Is it possible that the script would've been flipped if there happened to be better Japanese names? Well... [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 16:50, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::That's kinda getting into "shoulda/woulda/coulda" territory there... Yes, this would all be a non-issue had they called them [[Blurp|Bukubuku]] or something, but they didn't. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:06, March 18, 2025 (EDT)

@LinkTheLefty: Your vote is reminding me of [[Talk:Snow Cheep Cheep|Snow Cheep Cheep]]. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 16:31, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:How so? Snow Cheep Cheep came from a misunderstood mission title that amounted to an aesthetic difference with no unique qualities, which can be understood within its own game. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 16:50, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::It's separated in the Capture List (like the Yoshi's Island DS museum), and is a variant of Cheep Cheep that is not the "main" one. And although it technically has no unique qualities, the game acts as though its ability to swim in cold water is unique to it if I remember correctly, since normal Cheep Cheeps never have access to cold water. I guess you could compare it to something like Sky Blooper. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 17:28, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::Although all Cheeps Cheep can swim underwater, in this game and in YIDS they can't and that's why this variant was created, regardless of whether Cheeps Cheeps can swim underwater anyway, Nintendo sees these enemies as variants.
:::And unlike "snow cheep cheep", this one does have names available in other different languages, and finally, if I remember correctly, the cheeps cheeps from Mario Odyssey are called Cheep Cheep(snow)[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 18:57, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::::They explicitly ''don't'' see them as variants, as I have said and demonstrated repeatedly. If this split goes through, the resulting page will '''have''' to be named "Cheep Cheep" with an identifier, because that is its most common, most accurate, and most current name. "Piscatory Pete" has no manner of being the preferred name here; it was used exactly once in the oldest available source, which also mis-named and oddly split plenty of other things. Now, what that identifier will be, "underwater" is the most official, but that doesn't do a good job of identifying it from other ones. Also, how is "Cheep Cheep (snow)" any different a situation than "Cheep Cheep (underwater)?" "Snow Cheep Cheep" came from the in-game mission title, which is ''more'' official than "Underwater Cheep Cheep" here coming from a '''single''' third-party guide. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:13, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::By removing the guide I previously showed, removing the Yoshi Island DS museum, and removing all the evidence previously given, yes, they are the same enemy.

:::::Also, I'd like to see where it's called "cheep cheep" in more recent sources.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 19:37, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::The guide has now been released as official, and it actually fixes mistakes made by Shogakukan, such as not having Japanese names for Prince Froggy and Bowling Goonie.

:::::And finally, I don't know if you know, but once again in the Yoshi Island DS museum, both individuals are seen separately, unlike individuals who have remained together despite being different, like the Boos and Big Boos. This is on a higher level than a simple mission name.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 19:50, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::::::The NoA Player's Guide for YIDS (ie, the same "tier" of source as the only guide that gave the name "Piscatory Pete," but more recent) calls them "Cheep Cheeps." Pretty sure the PRIMA one ''also'' calls them that. Also, the Island Museum doesn't even give names. It has them in different "tanks," sure, but that's more to do with them being encountered in different contexts than them being different enemies. As I said before, the guide you brought up is an '''exception''', as every other guide in that language treats them as interchangeable, and even then, the only difference it has is appending an identifier to the front rather than the back. A '''single''' thing contradicting everything else does not make that single thing right; calling everything else a "mistake" is nothing but [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias confirmation bias], as the other guides treat them as interchangeable because they're ''intended'' to be interchangeable. The one you're championing here is the one that's wrong due to it being contradictory with everything else. That is merely an objective fact. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:53, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::I still don't see it, regardless of whether they treat him as a cheep cheep, he is a different subject from this one and acts differently from this one. The truth is that although all the guides treat them as relative, they have too many differences to even be considered the same individual, that's why I'm inclined to divide them. If Mario Portal created a page for the Yoshi saga, we would resolve these doubts once and for all.

:::::::Furthermore, regardless of whether less credible guides call them the same, if this official guide separates them with the name Underwater Cheep Cheep, then that will be the name they will keep.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 20:02, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::::::::Again, the '''more''' credible guide'''s''' lump them together. The "less credible guide" is the one that you are using as evidence, and the name they "kept" was simply "Pukupuku"/"Cheep Cheep", not that other one. We've been over this. I don't know why you're assuming that must be the absolute 100% infallibly correct one, other than the aforementioned confirmation bias. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:04, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::::I'm not saying that everything else is a mistake, I'm just saying that it has little credibility. I also mentioned above because I think that for the first time this guide has more credibility than one from Shogakukan.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 20:15, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::::::::::Ultimately, it doesn't. That it outright contradicts other official sources make it a black sheep, which in regards to information pertaining to a fictional medium, is not a good thing. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:17, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::::::I still don't see it, why making two completely different sprites both for the water and for underwater variant, when this was already demonstrated possible more than 10 years ago with the first Super Mario, having Cheeps Cheeps that jump and others that dive without any problem.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 20:21, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::::::::::::That I explained in the original proposal. " ...they look different simply because Flopsy Fish uses assembled pieces (and a large rotating sprite) for its complex movement patterns (as part of showing off the smaller capabilities of the Super FX chip), while Piscatory Pete conserves graphic space for its simple movements with 16x16 pixel sprites, which appear to be inspired by the SMW Cheep Cheep sprite... " There were a lot of inconsistencies in sprites depending on what is able to make complex animations and what isn't. Shy Guys suddenly gain different shoes when rolling after being spat out by a Yoshi because that rolling sprite is only one tile while their normal animations have separate moving parts, for example. The fact that the underwater Cheeps are obscured in-game by the water layer also means they would be better off with a simpler sprite that can be easier seen through the filtering. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:44, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::::::::It's something that could have been changed in Yoshi Island DS, like Bullet Bill's color going from green to the gray common in all the games, or even Cheep Cheep, going from having yellow fins to having white fins like a normal Cheep Cheep. Why not do the same with Pete?[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 20:50, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
::::::::::::::Same reason [[Incoming Chomp]] has good shading in that game while Shark Chomp doesn't. There's a lot of developmental inconsistencies there. And YNI ''did'' change their design to be the standard one, so again, that's a moot point. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:51, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:::::::::::::::You know, I think this won't get anywhere, no matter how many arguments you give me and no matter how many arguments I give you, we're not going to change our minds because we both believe we're right. I think the best thing would be to just let the proposal decide what to do.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 20:55, March 18, 2025 (EDT)

Here is a comparison of the Cheep Cheeps in the ''Yoshi's Island'' series. As can be seen, the underwater ones started off with a sprite distinct from the jumping type (though much of the face appears about the same with different coloration), but in the most recent game of the series they clearly use the same model.
<gallery perrow=3>
Piscatory Pete.png|Basic underwater
SMW2 Piscatory Pete yellow.png|Harder underwater
SMW2 Flopsy Fish vertical.png|Jumper
YIDS White Piscatory Pete.png|Basic underwater
YIDS Yellow Piscatory Pete.png|Harder underwater
CheepCheep YIDS.png|Jumper
YNI Cheep Cheep.png|Basic underwater
YNI Piscatory Deep Cheep.png|Harder underwater
YNI Flopsy Cheep Cheep.png|Jumper
</gallery>
Also, ''Yoshi's Story''{{'}}s underwater Cheep Cheeps use a similar design to the underwater SMW2 ones... but colored red. [[File:CheepCheepYS.png]]<br>
-[[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:58, March 18, 2025 (EDT)
:I don't know if you knew, but Pete's lips are taken from Loch Nestor, so even though they look like a cheep cheep's, they are from Loch Nestor.[[User:Sorbetti|Sorbetti]] ([[User talk:Sorbetti|talk]]) 21:02, March 18, 2025 (EDT)