View source for Talk:Chain Chomp

{{FATALK}}
{{partofpipe|image=|type=article|name=SMWikify|goal=Super Mario Wikify (for this article &ndash; Un-Wikipedia-fy)}}

This article is still a wiki dump as many of the paragraphs about appearances from individual games are still directly from Wikipedia. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]

== Species ==
Are these '''''REALLY''''' dogs? Has this been officialy stated? [[User:3dejong|3dejong]]

Well... they have dog-like personalities and were based off a dog attack to Shigeru... I'll have to add that they are dog-like, not dogs themselves.{{User:Knife/sig}}

They're dogs. RUFF! [[User:Phailure]]

== Name? ==

Is it Chain-Chomp (with a dash) or Chain Chomp (w/o dash)? <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Need to tell me something? Go to my talk page.]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]]<tt>&middot;</tt></small>) 23:09, 7 November 2006 (EST)

I'm asking again: Is it Chain-Chomp (with a dash) or Chain Chomp (w/o dash)? <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Need to tell me something? Go to my talk page.]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]]<tt>&middot;</tt></small>) 19:32, 14 November 2006 (EST)

I've always spelled it without one. {{User:Monty Mole/sig}} 19:33, 14 November 2006 (EST)

They seem to use it inter-changably (was that spelled right?) in the games. [[User:Maxlover2|Maxlover2]] 13:27, 18 February 2007 (EST) Ha! I signed!

==DANG YOU GREENKOOPA!==

Why'd you undo my edit? There was a proposal about Humorous Image Captions a while ago, and they became allowed! WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU GK?!! {{User:Phailure/sig}}

:Whoa dude, chill. Your caption wasn't humourous. Like, why would someone run away? Who are you telling to run? Are you talking to the reader? Because you're not supposed to do that. That's called "Referring to the reader directly". Besides, no offence, your caption wasn't humourous. :/ {{UseR:Garlic Man/sig}}


...How do big, metal spheres.... "Pass on the next generation"....? {{unsigned|Dimentio}}

== Quote ==

The quote says it's from Mario Party 5, but the game isn't in the article. Did Chain Chomps appear in Mario Party 5? (I don't have the game, so I don't know) {{user:Mario jc/sig}}
:[[Chain Chomp Capsule]]. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

==Images==
Do we REALLY need additionnal images? I mean, I think it has enough now to be honest. {{User:Booderdash/sig|.}}


==Wanaan==
Should this be considered a Chain Chomp cameo? Here it is:[http://megaman.wikia.com/wiki/Wanaan]. Kinda creepy, huh? [[User:Paperphailurethemariomonster99|Wanwanwan...]]

== Category:Animate Objects ==
Id like to know if most people would agree with me to put all Chain Chomp species in this category,since I am for it.--[[User:Swooper888|Swooper888]] 20:55, 26 November 2011 (EST)
:They move on their own, so no. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}

:[[Yakkey]] is an animate object, Chain Chomps are a species, an animate object is anything that has no business being alive and is normally not alive like a trash can or a talking key. -[[User:FourPaperHeroes|<span style="color:green">'''Four'''</span> <span style="color:grey">'''Paper'''</span>]] [[User talk:FourPaperHeroes|<span style="color:green">'''Heroes'''</span>]] [[File:FourPaperHeroes.jpg|35px]] 21:01, 26 November 2011 (EST)
Thwomps are a species and they have been in the animated objects category for a long time.Animated objects for the world that the Mario games take place in can also be things that are living rock for example,as in, in a full fledged species way.Also Bob1996,animated object does not just mean like if magic forces an object to move,it can also mean a living object that has a mind of its own like the piano in Mario 64.--[[User:Swooper888|Swooper888]] 23:21, 26 November 2011 (EST)
:Well they are kind of moving metal dog things and metal is an object so yeah it kind of fits {{User|Raven Effect}}
Ill add them along with all their relatives and characters to the category once most people are fine with it.Also for the record,it be safe to not put any robots in the animated object category,they may technically count as an animated object but I think it looks the best having them just being in the robot category only.Chain Chomps I can tell are not machines,they are more of living metal then a robot and the same might be said for bob-ombs.(they seem more like living metal with a natural windup key in their back then robots.) But Ill leave that for another debate.--[[User:Swooper888|Swooper888]] 23:33, 26 November 2011 (EST)