You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Debate concerning deletion ==
| |
| === Support ===
| |
|
| |
| Why do we have an article about a machine appearing in one minigame and as a Carnival Figure? I don't see the point in this article. | | Why do we have an article about a machine appearing in one minigame and as a Carnival Figure? I don't see the point in this article. |
|
| |
|
| {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT) | | {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT) |
| :Plus, this article is mostly padding. It talks about what happens in the aforementioned minigame rather than the vehicle itself. This article is like making an article for the [[Hop-O-Matic 4000]]. It's redundant, pointless, and stupid. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} 00:30, 2 May 2013 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| === Oppose ===
| |
|
| |
| In my opinion, the details of articles like these are what I love most about Mariowiki. The information from this article isn't "filler", it's just information not important to you personally. Imagine if someone would like to draw this for example. The detailed description would surely help at that. I suggest the article stays the way it is.
| |
| Also, the Hop-O-Matic 4000 doesn't have such a dynamic introductory cutscene, detailed design, Carnival Figure and uploaded model, unlike the Bullet Blitzer. {{User:Scarlet Pairo/sig}} 14:07, October 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :Per Scarlet Pario, this is a relevant ''Mario'' subject -- it just needs to cut down on its writing [[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]] ([[User talk:Results May Vary|talk]]) 22:06, October 31, 2021 (EDT)
| |
