Editing Talk:Bull's-Eye Bill
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 285: | Line 285: | ||
::::::I honestly think that should be a separate issue since we already have enough "proto-Bull's-Eye Bills", though I'd say that if Purple Bullet Bill merges with Bullet Bill then it makes sense to do the same to Guided Bullet Bill. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:29, July 17, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::I honestly think that should be a separate issue since we already have enough "proto-Bull's-Eye Bills", though I'd say that if Purple Bullet Bill merges with Bullet Bill then it makes sense to do the same to Guided Bullet Bill. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:29, July 17, 2019 (EDT) | ||
Since that was being asked elsewhere, if a proposal were to be made, I don't think it makes sense to go into combinatorics, it would be just '' | Since that was being asked elsewhere, if a proposal were to be made, I don't think it makes sense to go into combinatorics, it would be just ''split the predecessors'' and ''Do nothing''. We either want this page to deal exclusively with the Bull's Eye Bills that were introduced with ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii'' or we want to cover their predecessors as well, at which point it makes little sense to include some but not others (the ''Mario Party 8'' red Bullet Bills don't need the proposal, someone with knowledge of the game can just merge them already in the appropriate page).<br> | ||
In any case, unless someone else comes up supporting the idea to be stricter in the coverage of this page, I think the proposal would be overkill, at best I can just group the enemies that came before in the ''Predecessors'' section and that's it.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 09:38, July 18, 2019 (EDT) | In any case, unless someone else comes up supporting the idea to be stricter in the coverage of this page, I think the proposal would be overkill, at best I can just group the enemies that came before in the ''Predecessors'' section and that's it.--[[User:Mister Wu|Mister Wu]] ([[User talk:Mister Wu|talk]]) 09:38, July 18, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:I believe we might be able to reach a middle ground between moving all and moving none (again, I feel that about-facing is somewhat unique behavior that can potentially return as its own Bullet Bill variant separate from modern homing ones), but if the specifics on that are going nowhere then maybe an "all or nothing" situation is needed in order to proceed. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:07, July 18, 2019 (EDT) | :I believe we might be able to reach a middle ground between moving all and moving none (again, I feel that about-facing is somewhat unique behavior that can potentially return as its own Bullet Bill variant separate from modern homing ones), but if the specifics on that are going nowhere then maybe an "all or nothing" situation is needed in order to proceed. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:07, July 18, 2019 (EDT) |