You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Did I miss a proposal or something to make articles like this? The last I remember, SSB movesets were to be merged with their respective articles. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 23:39, 23 December 2008 (EST) | | Did I miss a proposal or something to make articles like this? The last I remember, SSB movesets were to be merged with their respective articles. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 23:39, 23 December 2008 (EST) |
|
| |
| :This is a test for now. We had to move this out of the [[Bowser]] article to make it less cluttered so it could be an FA. This matches the spirit of the proposal, as all the special moves are merged into one article, instead of having many. There is simply not room in many articles for all this content, which necessitated the article creation. But it could be moved back if needed. -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
| |
| ::Personally, I think they should have individual articles like before, but if they are merged into the character article they should be organized in a table. {{User:Daniel Webster/Miniature}} 23:45, 23 December 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :::Again, tables limit the content, which was prohibited by the proposal. No content can be lost. So we either need individual articles, an article like this, or a section like this in the bigger article. -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
| |
| ::::Mkay. I got it. Perhaps I can toy around with some table coding to make it work. ...If I have the time. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 23:51, 23 December 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| :::::Or we could make it a sub-page of the Bowser article. That way it would still be a part of the article, but would not clutter up the main body of the article. That's probably the best option. -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
| |
| :Yeah that sounds swell. {{User:Daniel Webster/Miniature}} 23:55, 23 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| ::Good idea! {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 23:57, 23 December 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Cool. This makes a lot of sense I think. Now we don't have to do this for every Smash Bros. fighter, but if the article is cluttered, this is an option to help reduce the clutter but keep the content in the same page. -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
| |
