You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 48: |
Line 48: |
| #{{User|DryBonesBandit}} Per all. | | #{{User|DryBonesBandit}} Per all. |
| #{{User|ReeceeYT}} Per all. | | #{{User|ReeceeYT}} Per all. |
| #{{User|Nintendo101}} I understand the perspective, but I am not convinced the name of the Boo Guy in ''Partners in Time'' can be comfortably applied to Greapers. As for Polterguy, it also looks too different from Boo Guy (beyond it being a toy), is mechanically distinct, and it was notably developed by American staff. If it was supposed to be a Boo Guy, why didn't they just call it one? Or call it a blue Boo Guy if it was supposed to be some weird variant? The other returning toy iterations of classic enemies in ''MvsDK'' are not like this.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Comments=== | | ===Comments=== |