Editing Talk:Black Chest Demon
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
==What to do with this article== | ==What to do with this article== | ||
{{ | {{TPP}} | ||
Basically, "Black Chest Demon" is a poor conjectural title for this article. These aren't demons, they're four heroes who saved the world 1,000 years prior to the game's events and got cursed by the Shadow Queen. They are never called "demons" at all, only the Shadow Queen herself is. There have been a few discussions regarding the name and state of this article but all of them have fizzled out with no conclusion. So let's fix that already. | Basically, "Black Chest Demon" is a poor conjectural title for this article. These aren't demons, they're four heroes who saved the world 1,000 years prior to the game's events and got cursed by the Shadow Queen. They are never called "demons" at all, only the Shadow Queen herself is. There have been a few discussions regarding the name and state of this article but all of them have fizzled out with no conclusion. So let's fix that already. | ||
Line 76: | Line 75: | ||
#{{User|Dine2017}} Per proposal and Hewer. It would be strange to categorize the black chests as characters since they don't speak. | #{{User|Dine2017}} Per proposal and Hewer. It would be strange to categorize the black chests as characters since they don't speak. | ||
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} After thinking about it, even though Glowsquid has a fair point and the name "four heroes" doesn't exactly reflect their in-game role, it ''is'' a non-conjectural name, and it makes more sense to keep the characters split from the objects, because that allows the character articles to touch on their history as told by Grifty before the events of the game. | #{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} After thinking about it, even though Glowsquid has a fair point and the name "four heroes" doesn't exactly reflect their in-game role, it ''is'' a non-conjectural name, and it makes more sense to keep the characters split from the objects, because that allows the character articles to touch on their history as told by Grifty before the events of the game. | ||
====Merge with black chest==== | ====Merge with black chest==== | ||
#{{User|7feetunder}} Second choice. | #{{User|7feetunder}} Second choice. | ||
Line 88: | Line 85: | ||
#{{user|Shokora}} – Per all. | #{{user|Shokora}} – Per all. | ||
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} I agree with Glowsquid. | #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} I agree with Glowsquid. | ||
====Rename to a different conjectural name==== | ====Rename to a different conjectural name==== | ||
Line 108: | Line 102: | ||
#...their actual name of "four heroes" is REALLY non-specific, too; it could refer to ''any'' set of four heroes. For instance: Mario, Luigi, Peach and Toad in ''Super Mario Bros. 2''; or Donkey Kong, Diddy Kong, Dixie Kong and Cranky Kong in ''Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze''. If their English name was something along the lines of their Japanese or Spanish names, that translate to "Rogueport's Millenary Four Heroes", or something simple like "The Four Heroes of Rogueport", then that would be sufficiently clear enough, but no, it's ''just'' "four heroes". | #...their actual name of "four heroes" is REALLY non-specific, too; it could refer to ''any'' set of four heroes. For instance: Mario, Luigi, Peach and Toad in ''Super Mario Bros. 2''; or Donkey Kong, Diddy Kong, Dixie Kong and Cranky Kong in ''Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze''. If their English name was something along the lines of their Japanese or Spanish names, that translate to "Rogueport's Millenary Four Heroes", or something simple like "The Four Heroes of Rogueport", then that would be sufficiently clear enough, but no, it's ''just'' "four heroes". | ||
But they are also important enough to have their own separate article, instead of being relegated to the black chest article, so merging with that page is also out, I feel. And moving to another conjectural name, or keeping the conjectural name they already have, is also weird when they ''do'' have an actual name. I... literally don't know what to do here. {{User:Arend/sig}} 06:25, May 19, 2023 (EDT) | But they are also important enough to have their own separate article, instead of being relegated to the black chest article, so merging with that page is also out, I feel. And moving to another conjectural name, or keeping the conjectural name they already have, is also weird when they ''do'' have an actual name. I... literally don't know what to do here. {{User:Arend/sig}} 06:25, May 19, 2023 (EDT) | ||