Editing Talk:Bell Kritter

Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? {{User:Reversinator/sig}}
:Nope, they shouldn't have an article. {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}}

They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--{{User|Knife}} 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

==Merge this article with [[Kritter#Donkey Kong 64]]==
{{Settled TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|5-0|merge}}
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at [[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs]], which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.

'''Proposer:''' {{User|YoshiKong}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT

====Support====
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy.
#{{User|Coooool123}} Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter?
#{{User|Kelton2}} Of course. What is with all these small articles that should be merged?
#{{User|Yoshi K}} Hey guys! If we should keep this article, we should make one for the bell they ring too! So in other words, merge.

====Oppose====

====Comments?====
@Kelton2: Tell me about it. Plus, everyone seems to want to split all the articles of different sizes (eg Mega/Mini versions of the same thing). It's so pointless.{{User|Coooool123}}
:Size really shouldn't matter when it comes to deciding an article's merit. I mean, I've created [[Tornado (item)|many]] [[Broken Wheel|different]] [[Banana Shot|item]] [[‎Big & Small Tire|articles]] currently-all are small-yet they are still standalone items and stuff. It's only for stuff like this where this article can be merged into another and still make sense {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}}