Editing Talk:Bad Adder

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
==Subtracting an Adder==
==Subtracting an Adder==
{{Talk}}
The remake's Monster List has the same entry for Bad Adder and Mad Adder, just with Cloaker and Domino's names swapped: "''Apparently it would be called something else if it had fused with ''Domino/Cloaker'' instead of ''Cloaker/Domino''. Which raises the question...what is this monster's true name?''" So if it wasn't obvious before that these are the same creature, we have confirmation. This would make for an easy merge except it ''does'' raise the question: what to merge it ''as''? I guess we can call it "Adder", except I believe that's conjectural. The Player's Guide isn't really helpful on this, either: it only mentions Cloaker's as "Earthlink" on the Domino & Cloaker strategy on page 103, and lists Earth Link on 113 and Mad Adder on 114 among the major meanies. We can go with "Bad Adder" since it appears first in the Monster List, except that seems like an arbitrary reason and it was clearly named after Mad Adder. "Snake (boss)" or maybe "Snake (''Super Mario RPG'')" seems like our best bet, since it shows up in Cloaker and Domino's fused profiles: "''He may look like he's just riding on his snake's head, but ''Cloaker/Domino'' insists that they have formed a single creature.''" and also appears in said Player's Guide on 103: "''Once the snake is squished, Cloaker will vamoose.''" The rationale would, once again, be similar to the cake boss merge. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:25, January 3, 2024 (EST)
The remake's Monster List has the same entry for Bad Adder and Mad Adder, just with Cloaker and Domino's names swapped: "''Apparently it would be called something else if it had fused with ''Domino/Cloaker'' instead of ''Cloaker/Domino''. Which raises the question...what is this monster's true name?''" So if it wasn't obvious before that these are the same creature, we have confirmation. This would make for an easy merge except it ''does'' raise the question: what to merge it ''as''? I guess we can call it "Adder", except I believe that's conjectural. The Player's Guide isn't really helpful on this, either: it only mentions Cloaker's as "Earthlink" on the Domino & Cloaker strategy on page 103, and lists Earth Link on 113 and Mad Adder on 114 among the major meanies. We can go with "Bad Adder" since it appears first in the Monster List, except that seems like an arbitrary reason and it was clearly named after Mad Adder. "Snake (boss)" or maybe "Snake (''Super Mario RPG'')" seems like our best bet, since it shows up in Cloaker and Domino's fused profiles: "''He may look like he's just riding on his snake's head, but ''Cloaker/Domino'' insists that they have formed a single creature.''" and also appears in said Player's Guide on 103: "''Once the snake is squished, Cloaker will vamoose.''" The rationale would, once again, be similar to the cake boss merge. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:25, January 3, 2024 (EST)
:My two cents to this question, I lean a bit more on keeping them split. While they do serve the exact same purpose, are basically the same thing and you only have to fight one of them per play through, I don't see a problem with keeping them split. They have different stats and keeping them split would remain consistent with other RPG enemies that are mere color swaps and they also have official names, while merging them just forces a conjectural title over two articles with official titles. Plus the game doesn't really give any further context on "which is the real/true version" so I don't see any problem with keeping them split. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
:My two cents to this question, I lean a bit more on keeping them split. While they do serve the exact same purpose, are basically the same thing and you only have to fight one of them per play through, I don't see a problem with keeping them split. They have different stats and keeping them split would remain consistent with other RPG enemies that are mere color swaps and they also have official names, while merging them just forces a conjectural title over two articles with official titles. Plus the game doesn't really give any further context on "which is the real/true version" so I don't see any problem with keeping them split. {{User:Tails777/sig}}

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)